Cargando…

Women in larger bodies’ experiences with contraception: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: As the prevalence of obesity increases and the age of onset decreases, more women of reproductive age will be living in larger bodies. Research on weight-related efficacy and safety has informed clinical guidelines for routine and emergency contraceptive use by women with a higher body m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyce, Tierney M., Neiterman, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8082612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33926501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01139-2
_version_ 1783685875178143744
author Boyce, Tierney M.
Neiterman, Elena
author_facet Boyce, Tierney M.
Neiterman, Elena
author_sort Boyce, Tierney M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As the prevalence of obesity increases and the age of onset decreases, more women of reproductive age will be living in larger bodies. Research on weight-related efficacy and safety has informed clinical guidelines for routine and emergency contraceptive use by women with a higher body mass index; however, patient perspectives are needed to understand women in larger bodies’ experiences with contraception and contraceptive care. This scoping review summarizes the literature on women in larger bodies’ experiences with contraception with the goal of gaining a better understanding of the nature of these experiences and identifying gaps in the existing research. METHODS: Following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, a scoping review of the literature was conducted. Four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and CINAHL) were searched for peer-reviewed, empirical articles published in English between 2010 and 2020, with a focus on North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. Data were summarized by identifying key themes in the reviewed literature. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles meeting the eligibility criteria were reviewed. The literature was predominantly quantitative (n = 27), with only one qualitative study and one systematic review, respectively. Five themes were identified, including (1) use of contraception among women in larger bodies; (2) knowledge, attitudes towards and beliefs about contraception; (3) contraceptive (dis)satisfaction among women in larger bodies; (4) contraceptive counseling; and (5) barriers to contraception. The findings revealed that women in larger bodies may have unmet contraceptive care needs. Despite many articles addressing the need to improve contraceptive counseling for women in larger bodies (n = 26), few explored how women felt about their care (n = 2). Finally, only two articles focused on emergency contraception, indicating a need for further research. CONCLUSION: This scoping review emphasizes the pressing need for qualitative research to explore women in larger bodies’ experiences with routine and emergency contraception, as well as receiving contraceptive counseling and care. Future research exploring the lived experiences of women in larger bodies is necessary to better characterize their contraceptive needs and identify avenues to improve patient care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-021-01139-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8082612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80826122021-04-29 Women in larger bodies’ experiences with contraception: a scoping review Boyce, Tierney M. Neiterman, Elena Reprod Health Review BACKGROUND: As the prevalence of obesity increases and the age of onset decreases, more women of reproductive age will be living in larger bodies. Research on weight-related efficacy and safety has informed clinical guidelines for routine and emergency contraceptive use by women with a higher body mass index; however, patient perspectives are needed to understand women in larger bodies’ experiences with contraception and contraceptive care. This scoping review summarizes the literature on women in larger bodies’ experiences with contraception with the goal of gaining a better understanding of the nature of these experiences and identifying gaps in the existing research. METHODS: Following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, a scoping review of the literature was conducted. Four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and CINAHL) were searched for peer-reviewed, empirical articles published in English between 2010 and 2020, with a focus on North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. Data were summarized by identifying key themes in the reviewed literature. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles meeting the eligibility criteria were reviewed. The literature was predominantly quantitative (n = 27), with only one qualitative study and one systematic review, respectively. Five themes were identified, including (1) use of contraception among women in larger bodies; (2) knowledge, attitudes towards and beliefs about contraception; (3) contraceptive (dis)satisfaction among women in larger bodies; (4) contraceptive counseling; and (5) barriers to contraception. The findings revealed that women in larger bodies may have unmet contraceptive care needs. Despite many articles addressing the need to improve contraceptive counseling for women in larger bodies (n = 26), few explored how women felt about their care (n = 2). Finally, only two articles focused on emergency contraception, indicating a need for further research. CONCLUSION: This scoping review emphasizes the pressing need for qualitative research to explore women in larger bodies’ experiences with routine and emergency contraception, as well as receiving contraceptive counseling and care. Future research exploring the lived experiences of women in larger bodies is necessary to better characterize their contraceptive needs and identify avenues to improve patient care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-021-01139-2. BioMed Central 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8082612/ /pubmed/33926501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01139-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Boyce, Tierney M.
Neiterman, Elena
Women in larger bodies’ experiences with contraception: a scoping review
title Women in larger bodies’ experiences with contraception: a scoping review
title_full Women in larger bodies’ experiences with contraception: a scoping review
title_fullStr Women in larger bodies’ experiences with contraception: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Women in larger bodies’ experiences with contraception: a scoping review
title_short Women in larger bodies’ experiences with contraception: a scoping review
title_sort women in larger bodies’ experiences with contraception: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8082612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33926501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01139-2
work_keys_str_mv AT boycetierneym womeninlargerbodiesexperienceswithcontraceptionascopingreview
AT neitermanelena womeninlargerbodiesexperienceswithcontraceptionascopingreview