Cargando…
Categorisation of patients based on immune profiles: a new approach to identifying candidates for response to checkpoint inhibitors
OBJECTIVES: Inhibitors to the checkpoint proteins cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated protein 4 (CTLA‐4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) are becoming widely used in cancer treatment. However, a lack of understanding of the patient response to treatment limits accurate identification of pote...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8082708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cti2.1267 |
_version_ | 1783685893357305856 |
---|---|
author | Bornschlegl, Svetlana Gustafson, Michael P Delivanis, Danae A Ryder, Mabel Liu, Minetta C Vasmatzis, George Hallemeier, Chris L Park, Sean S Roberts, Lewis R Parney, Ian F Jelinek, Diane F Dietz, Allan B |
author_facet | Bornschlegl, Svetlana Gustafson, Michael P Delivanis, Danae A Ryder, Mabel Liu, Minetta C Vasmatzis, George Hallemeier, Chris L Park, Sean S Roberts, Lewis R Parney, Ian F Jelinek, Diane F Dietz, Allan B |
author_sort | Bornschlegl, Svetlana |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Inhibitors to the checkpoint proteins cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated protein 4 (CTLA‐4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) are becoming widely used in cancer treatment. However, a lack of understanding of the patient response to treatment limits accurate identification of potential responders to immunotherapy. METHODS: In this study, we assessed the expression of PD‐1 and CTLA‐4 on 19 leucocyte populations in the peripheral blood of 74 cancer patients. A reference data set for PD‐1 and CTLA‐4 was established for 40 healthy volunteers to determine the normal expression patterns for these checkpoint proteins. RESULTS: Unsupervised hierarchical clustering found four immune profiles shared across the solid tumor types, while chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients had an immune profile largely unique to them. Furthermore, we measured these leucocyte populations on an additional cohort of 16 cancer patients receiving the PD‐1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in order to identify differences between responders and non‐responders, as well as compared to healthy volunteers (n = 20). We observed that cancer patients had pre‐treatment PD‐1 and CTLA‐4 expression on their leucocyte populations at different levels compared to healthy volunteers and identified two leucocyte populations positive for CTLA‐4 that had not been previously described. We found higher levels of PD‐1(+) CD3(+) CD4(−) CD8(−) cells in patients with progressive disease and have identified it as a potential biomarker of response, as well as identifying other significant differences in phenotypes between responders and non‐responders. CONCLUSION: These results are suggestive that categorisation of patients based on immune profiles may differentiate responders from non‐responders to immunotherapy for solid tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8082708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80827082021-05-07 Categorisation of patients based on immune profiles: a new approach to identifying candidates for response to checkpoint inhibitors Bornschlegl, Svetlana Gustafson, Michael P Delivanis, Danae A Ryder, Mabel Liu, Minetta C Vasmatzis, George Hallemeier, Chris L Park, Sean S Roberts, Lewis R Parney, Ian F Jelinek, Diane F Dietz, Allan B Clin Transl Immunology Original Article OBJECTIVES: Inhibitors to the checkpoint proteins cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated protein 4 (CTLA‐4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) are becoming widely used in cancer treatment. However, a lack of understanding of the patient response to treatment limits accurate identification of potential responders to immunotherapy. METHODS: In this study, we assessed the expression of PD‐1 and CTLA‐4 on 19 leucocyte populations in the peripheral blood of 74 cancer patients. A reference data set for PD‐1 and CTLA‐4 was established for 40 healthy volunteers to determine the normal expression patterns for these checkpoint proteins. RESULTS: Unsupervised hierarchical clustering found four immune profiles shared across the solid tumor types, while chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients had an immune profile largely unique to them. Furthermore, we measured these leucocyte populations on an additional cohort of 16 cancer patients receiving the PD‐1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in order to identify differences between responders and non‐responders, as well as compared to healthy volunteers (n = 20). We observed that cancer patients had pre‐treatment PD‐1 and CTLA‐4 expression on their leucocyte populations at different levels compared to healthy volunteers and identified two leucocyte populations positive for CTLA‐4 that had not been previously described. We found higher levels of PD‐1(+) CD3(+) CD4(−) CD8(−) cells in patients with progressive disease and have identified it as a potential biomarker of response, as well as identifying other significant differences in phenotypes between responders and non‐responders. CONCLUSION: These results are suggestive that categorisation of patients based on immune profiles may differentiate responders from non‐responders to immunotherapy for solid tumors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8082708/ /pubmed/33968403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cti2.1267 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical & Translational Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian and New Zealand Society for Immunology, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bornschlegl, Svetlana Gustafson, Michael P Delivanis, Danae A Ryder, Mabel Liu, Minetta C Vasmatzis, George Hallemeier, Chris L Park, Sean S Roberts, Lewis R Parney, Ian F Jelinek, Diane F Dietz, Allan B Categorisation of patients based on immune profiles: a new approach to identifying candidates for response to checkpoint inhibitors |
title | Categorisation of patients based on immune profiles: a new approach to identifying candidates for response to checkpoint inhibitors |
title_full | Categorisation of patients based on immune profiles: a new approach to identifying candidates for response to checkpoint inhibitors |
title_fullStr | Categorisation of patients based on immune profiles: a new approach to identifying candidates for response to checkpoint inhibitors |
title_full_unstemmed | Categorisation of patients based on immune profiles: a new approach to identifying candidates for response to checkpoint inhibitors |
title_short | Categorisation of patients based on immune profiles: a new approach to identifying candidates for response to checkpoint inhibitors |
title_sort | categorisation of patients based on immune profiles: a new approach to identifying candidates for response to checkpoint inhibitors |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8082708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cti2.1267 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bornschleglsvetlana categorisationofpatientsbasedonimmuneprofilesanewapproachtoidentifyingcandidatesforresponsetocheckpointinhibitors AT gustafsonmichaelp categorisationofpatientsbasedonimmuneprofilesanewapproachtoidentifyingcandidatesforresponsetocheckpointinhibitors AT delivanisdanaea categorisationofpatientsbasedonimmuneprofilesanewapproachtoidentifyingcandidatesforresponsetocheckpointinhibitors AT rydermabel categorisationofpatientsbasedonimmuneprofilesanewapproachtoidentifyingcandidatesforresponsetocheckpointinhibitors AT liuminettac categorisationofpatientsbasedonimmuneprofilesanewapproachtoidentifyingcandidatesforresponsetocheckpointinhibitors AT vasmatzisgeorge categorisationofpatientsbasedonimmuneprofilesanewapproachtoidentifyingcandidatesforresponsetocheckpointinhibitors AT hallemeierchrisl categorisationofpatientsbasedonimmuneprofilesanewapproachtoidentifyingcandidatesforresponsetocheckpointinhibitors AT parkseans categorisationofpatientsbasedonimmuneprofilesanewapproachtoidentifyingcandidatesforresponsetocheckpointinhibitors AT robertslewisr categorisationofpatientsbasedonimmuneprofilesanewapproachtoidentifyingcandidatesforresponsetocheckpointinhibitors AT parneyianf categorisationofpatientsbasedonimmuneprofilesanewapproachtoidentifyingcandidatesforresponsetocheckpointinhibitors AT jelinekdianef categorisationofpatientsbasedonimmuneprofilesanewapproachtoidentifyingcandidatesforresponsetocheckpointinhibitors AT dietzallanb categorisationofpatientsbasedonimmuneprofilesanewapproachtoidentifyingcandidatesforresponsetocheckpointinhibitors |