Cargando…

Technical assistance in the field of risk communication

This report assesses peer‐reviewed and grey literature on risk communication concepts and practices, as requested by the European Commission to support the implementation of a ‘General Plan for Risk Communication’, i.e. an integrated framework for EU food safety risk assessors and risk managers at U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maxim, Laura, Mazzocchi, Mario, Van den Broucke, Stephan, Zollo, Fabiana, Robinson, Tobin, Rogers, Claire, Vrbos, Domagoj, Zamariola, Giorgia, Smith, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8083185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968254
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574
_version_ 1783685976548179968
author Maxim, Laura
Mazzocchi, Mario
Van den Broucke, Stephan
Zollo, Fabiana
Robinson, Tobin
Rogers, Claire
Vrbos, Domagoj
Zamariola, Giorgia
Smith, Anthony
author_facet Maxim, Laura
Mazzocchi, Mario
Van den Broucke, Stephan
Zollo, Fabiana
Robinson, Tobin
Rogers, Claire
Vrbos, Domagoj
Zamariola, Giorgia
Smith, Anthony
collection PubMed
description This report assesses peer‐reviewed and grey literature on risk communication concepts and practices, as requested by the European Commission to support the implementation of a ‘General Plan for Risk Communication’, i.e. an integrated framework for EU food safety risk assessors and risk managers at Union and national level, as required by the revised EU General Food Law Regulation. We conducted a scoping review of social research studies and official reports in relation to risk communication in the following areas: understanding and awareness of risk analysis roles and tasks, reducing misunderstanding of the different meaning of the terms ‘hazard’ and ‘risk’, tackling misinformation and disinformation, enhancing confidence in EU food safety, taking account of risk perceptions, key factors in trade‐offs about risks, audience segmentation and tools, channels and mechanisms for coordinated risk communications. We structured our findings as follows: i) definitions of key concepts, ii) audience analysis and information requirements, iii) risk profiling, models and mechanisms, iv) contributions to communication strategies. We make several recommendations for consideration by the Commission, both in terms of actions to support the design and implementation of the general plan, and research needs that we consider crucial to further inform appropriate risk communication in the EU. EFSA carried out a targeted consultation of experts and a public consultation open to all interested parties including the general public, in preparing and finalising this report.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8083185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80831852021-05-07 Technical assistance in the field of risk communication Maxim, Laura Mazzocchi, Mario Van den Broucke, Stephan Zollo, Fabiana Robinson, Tobin Rogers, Claire Vrbos, Domagoj Zamariola, Giorgia Smith, Anthony EFSA J Scientific Report This report assesses peer‐reviewed and grey literature on risk communication concepts and practices, as requested by the European Commission to support the implementation of a ‘General Plan for Risk Communication’, i.e. an integrated framework for EU food safety risk assessors and risk managers at Union and national level, as required by the revised EU General Food Law Regulation. We conducted a scoping review of social research studies and official reports in relation to risk communication in the following areas: understanding and awareness of risk analysis roles and tasks, reducing misunderstanding of the different meaning of the terms ‘hazard’ and ‘risk’, tackling misinformation and disinformation, enhancing confidence in EU food safety, taking account of risk perceptions, key factors in trade‐offs about risks, audience segmentation and tools, channels and mechanisms for coordinated risk communications. We structured our findings as follows: i) definitions of key concepts, ii) audience analysis and information requirements, iii) risk profiling, models and mechanisms, iv) contributions to communication strategies. We make several recommendations for consideration by the Commission, both in terms of actions to support the design and implementation of the general plan, and research needs that we consider crucial to further inform appropriate risk communication in the EU. EFSA carried out a targeted consultation of experts and a public consultation open to all interested parties including the general public, in preparing and finalising this report. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8083185/ /pubmed/33968254 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Report
Maxim, Laura
Mazzocchi, Mario
Van den Broucke, Stephan
Zollo, Fabiana
Robinson, Tobin
Rogers, Claire
Vrbos, Domagoj
Zamariola, Giorgia
Smith, Anthony
Technical assistance in the field of risk communication
title Technical assistance in the field of risk communication
title_full Technical assistance in the field of risk communication
title_fullStr Technical assistance in the field of risk communication
title_full_unstemmed Technical assistance in the field of risk communication
title_short Technical assistance in the field of risk communication
title_sort technical assistance in the field of risk communication
topic Scientific Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8083185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968254
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574
work_keys_str_mv AT technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT maximlaura technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT mazzocchimario technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT vandenbrouckestephan technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT zollofabiana technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT robinsontobin technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT rogersclaire technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT vrbosdomagoj technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT zamariolagiorgia technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT smithanthony technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication