Cargando…
Technical assistance in the field of risk communication
This report assesses peer‐reviewed and grey literature on risk communication concepts and practices, as requested by the European Commission to support the implementation of a ‘General Plan for Risk Communication’, i.e. an integrated framework for EU food safety risk assessors and risk managers at U...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8083185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968254 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574 |
_version_ | 1783685976548179968 |
---|---|
author | Maxim, Laura Mazzocchi, Mario Van den Broucke, Stephan Zollo, Fabiana Robinson, Tobin Rogers, Claire Vrbos, Domagoj Zamariola, Giorgia Smith, Anthony |
author_facet | Maxim, Laura Mazzocchi, Mario Van den Broucke, Stephan Zollo, Fabiana Robinson, Tobin Rogers, Claire Vrbos, Domagoj Zamariola, Giorgia Smith, Anthony |
collection | PubMed |
description | This report assesses peer‐reviewed and grey literature on risk communication concepts and practices, as requested by the European Commission to support the implementation of a ‘General Plan for Risk Communication’, i.e. an integrated framework for EU food safety risk assessors and risk managers at Union and national level, as required by the revised EU General Food Law Regulation. We conducted a scoping review of social research studies and official reports in relation to risk communication in the following areas: understanding and awareness of risk analysis roles and tasks, reducing misunderstanding of the different meaning of the terms ‘hazard’ and ‘risk’, tackling misinformation and disinformation, enhancing confidence in EU food safety, taking account of risk perceptions, key factors in trade‐offs about risks, audience segmentation and tools, channels and mechanisms for coordinated risk communications. We structured our findings as follows: i) definitions of key concepts, ii) audience analysis and information requirements, iii) risk profiling, models and mechanisms, iv) contributions to communication strategies. We make several recommendations for consideration by the Commission, both in terms of actions to support the design and implementation of the general plan, and research needs that we consider crucial to further inform appropriate risk communication in the EU. EFSA carried out a targeted consultation of experts and a public consultation open to all interested parties including the general public, in preparing and finalising this report. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8083185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80831852021-05-07 Technical assistance in the field of risk communication Maxim, Laura Mazzocchi, Mario Van den Broucke, Stephan Zollo, Fabiana Robinson, Tobin Rogers, Claire Vrbos, Domagoj Zamariola, Giorgia Smith, Anthony EFSA J Scientific Report This report assesses peer‐reviewed and grey literature on risk communication concepts and practices, as requested by the European Commission to support the implementation of a ‘General Plan for Risk Communication’, i.e. an integrated framework for EU food safety risk assessors and risk managers at Union and national level, as required by the revised EU General Food Law Regulation. We conducted a scoping review of social research studies and official reports in relation to risk communication in the following areas: understanding and awareness of risk analysis roles and tasks, reducing misunderstanding of the different meaning of the terms ‘hazard’ and ‘risk’, tackling misinformation and disinformation, enhancing confidence in EU food safety, taking account of risk perceptions, key factors in trade‐offs about risks, audience segmentation and tools, channels and mechanisms for coordinated risk communications. We structured our findings as follows: i) definitions of key concepts, ii) audience analysis and information requirements, iii) risk profiling, models and mechanisms, iv) contributions to communication strategies. We make several recommendations for consideration by the Commission, both in terms of actions to support the design and implementation of the general plan, and research needs that we consider crucial to further inform appropriate risk communication in the EU. EFSA carried out a targeted consultation of experts and a public consultation open to all interested parties including the general public, in preparing and finalising this report. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8083185/ /pubmed/33968254 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Report Maxim, Laura Mazzocchi, Mario Van den Broucke, Stephan Zollo, Fabiana Robinson, Tobin Rogers, Claire Vrbos, Domagoj Zamariola, Giorgia Smith, Anthony Technical assistance in the field of risk communication |
title | Technical assistance in the field of risk communication |
title_full | Technical assistance in the field of risk communication |
title_fullStr | Technical assistance in the field of risk communication |
title_full_unstemmed | Technical assistance in the field of risk communication |
title_short | Technical assistance in the field of risk communication |
title_sort | technical assistance in the field of risk communication |
topic | Scientific Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8083185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968254 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication AT maximlaura technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication AT mazzocchimario technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication AT vandenbrouckestephan technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication AT zollofabiana technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication AT robinsontobin technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication AT rogersclaire technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication AT vrbosdomagoj technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication AT zamariolagiorgia technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication AT smithanthony technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication |