Cargando…
Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2
INTRODUCTION: Reliable rapid testing for COVID-19 is needed in care homes to reduce the risk of outbreaks and enable timely care. This study aimed to examine the usability and test performance of a point of care polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 (POCKIT(TM) Central) in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8083194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33884411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab072 |
_version_ | 1783685977785499648 |
---|---|
author | Micocci, Massimo Gordon, Adam L Seo, Mikyung Kelly Allen, A Joy Davies, Kerrie Lasserson, Dan Thompson, Carl Spilsbury, Karen Akrill, Cyd Heath, Ros Astle, Anita Sharpe, Claire Perera, Rafael Hayward, Gail Buckle, Peter |
author_facet | Micocci, Massimo Gordon, Adam L Seo, Mikyung Kelly Allen, A Joy Davies, Kerrie Lasserson, Dan Thompson, Carl Spilsbury, Karen Akrill, Cyd Heath, Ros Astle, Anita Sharpe, Claire Perera, Rafael Hayward, Gail Buckle, Peter |
author_sort | Micocci, Massimo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Reliable rapid testing for COVID-19 is needed in care homes to reduce the risk of outbreaks and enable timely care. This study aimed to examine the usability and test performance of a point of care polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 (POCKIT(TM) Central) in care homes. METHODS: POCKIT(TM) Central was evaluated in a purposeful sample of four UK care homes. Test agreement with laboratory real-time PCR and usability and used errors were assessed. RESULTS: No significant usability-related hazards emerged, and the sources of error identified were found to be amendable with minor changes in training or test workflow. POCKIT(TM) Central has acceptable sensitivity and specificity based on RT-PCR as the reference standard, especially for symptomatic cases. Asymptomatic specimens showed 83.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.9–99.6%) positive agreement and 98.7% negative agreement (95% CI: 96.2–99.7%), with overall prevalence and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) of 0.965 (95% CI: 0.932– 0.999). Symptomatic specimens showed 100% (95% CI: 2.5–100%) positive agreement and 100% negative agreement (95% CI: 85.8–100%), with overall PABAK of 1. Recommendations are provided to mitigate the frequency of occurrence of the residual use errors observed. Integration pathways were discussed to identify opportunities and limitations of adopting POCKIT™ Central for screening and diagnostic testing purposes. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care PCR testing in care homes can be considered with appropriate preparatory steps and safeguards. Further diagnostic accuracy evaluations and in-service evaluation studies should be conducted, if the test is to be implemented more widely, to build greater certainty on this initial exploratory analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8083194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80831942021-05-03 Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 Micocci, Massimo Gordon, Adam L Seo, Mikyung Kelly Allen, A Joy Davies, Kerrie Lasserson, Dan Thompson, Carl Spilsbury, Karen Akrill, Cyd Heath, Ros Astle, Anita Sharpe, Claire Perera, Rafael Hayward, Gail Buckle, Peter Age Ageing Research Paper INTRODUCTION: Reliable rapid testing for COVID-19 is needed in care homes to reduce the risk of outbreaks and enable timely care. This study aimed to examine the usability and test performance of a point of care polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 (POCKIT(TM) Central) in care homes. METHODS: POCKIT(TM) Central was evaluated in a purposeful sample of four UK care homes. Test agreement with laboratory real-time PCR and usability and used errors were assessed. RESULTS: No significant usability-related hazards emerged, and the sources of error identified were found to be amendable with minor changes in training or test workflow. POCKIT(TM) Central has acceptable sensitivity and specificity based on RT-PCR as the reference standard, especially for symptomatic cases. Asymptomatic specimens showed 83.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.9–99.6%) positive agreement and 98.7% negative agreement (95% CI: 96.2–99.7%), with overall prevalence and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) of 0.965 (95% CI: 0.932– 0.999). Symptomatic specimens showed 100% (95% CI: 2.5–100%) positive agreement and 100% negative agreement (95% CI: 85.8–100%), with overall PABAK of 1. Recommendations are provided to mitigate the frequency of occurrence of the residual use errors observed. Integration pathways were discussed to identify opportunities and limitations of adopting POCKIT™ Central for screening and diagnostic testing purposes. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care PCR testing in care homes can be considered with appropriate preparatory steps and safeguards. Further diagnostic accuracy evaluations and in-service evaluation studies should be conducted, if the test is to be implemented more widely, to build greater certainty on this initial exploratory analysis. Oxford University Press 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8083194/ /pubmed/33884411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab072 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Micocci, Massimo Gordon, Adam L Seo, Mikyung Kelly Allen, A Joy Davies, Kerrie Lasserson, Dan Thompson, Carl Spilsbury, Karen Akrill, Cyd Heath, Ros Astle, Anita Sharpe, Claire Perera, Rafael Hayward, Gail Buckle, Peter Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 |
title | Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full | Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_fullStr | Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short | Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_sort | is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in england? an exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for sars-cov-2 |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8083194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33884411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT micoccimassimo ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT gordonadaml ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT seomikyungkelly ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT allenajoy ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT davieskerrie ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT lassersondan ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT thompsoncarl ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT spilsburykaren ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT akrillcyd ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT heathros ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT astleanita ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT sharpeclaire ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT pererarafael ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT haywardgail ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 AT bucklepeter ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2 |