Cargando…

Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2

INTRODUCTION: Reliable rapid testing for COVID-19 is needed in care homes to reduce the risk of outbreaks and enable timely care. This study aimed to examine the usability and test performance of a point of care polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 (POCKIT(TM) Central) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Micocci, Massimo, Gordon, Adam L, Seo, Mikyung Kelly, Allen, A Joy, Davies, Kerrie, Lasserson, Dan, Thompson, Carl, Spilsbury, Karen, Akrill, Cyd, Heath, Ros, Astle, Anita, Sharpe, Claire, Perera, Rafael, Hayward, Gail, Buckle, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8083194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33884411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab072
_version_ 1783685977785499648
author Micocci, Massimo
Gordon, Adam L
Seo, Mikyung Kelly
Allen, A Joy
Davies, Kerrie
Lasserson, Dan
Thompson, Carl
Spilsbury, Karen
Akrill, Cyd
Heath, Ros
Astle, Anita
Sharpe, Claire
Perera, Rafael
Hayward, Gail
Buckle, Peter
author_facet Micocci, Massimo
Gordon, Adam L
Seo, Mikyung Kelly
Allen, A Joy
Davies, Kerrie
Lasserson, Dan
Thompson, Carl
Spilsbury, Karen
Akrill, Cyd
Heath, Ros
Astle, Anita
Sharpe, Claire
Perera, Rafael
Hayward, Gail
Buckle, Peter
author_sort Micocci, Massimo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Reliable rapid testing for COVID-19 is needed in care homes to reduce the risk of outbreaks and enable timely care. This study aimed to examine the usability and test performance of a point of care polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 (POCKIT(TM) Central) in care homes. METHODS: POCKIT(TM) Central was evaluated in a purposeful sample of four UK care homes. Test agreement with laboratory real-time PCR and usability and used errors were assessed. RESULTS: No significant usability-related hazards emerged, and the sources of error identified were found to be amendable with minor changes in training or test workflow. POCKIT(TM) Central has acceptable sensitivity and specificity based on RT-PCR as the reference standard, especially for symptomatic cases. Asymptomatic specimens showed 83.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.9–99.6%) positive agreement and 98.7% negative agreement (95% CI: 96.2–99.7%), with overall prevalence and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) of 0.965 (95% CI: 0.932– 0.999). Symptomatic specimens showed 100% (95% CI: 2.5–100%) positive agreement and 100% negative agreement (95% CI: 85.8–100%), with overall PABAK of 1. Recommendations are provided to mitigate the frequency of occurrence of the residual use errors observed. Integration pathways were discussed to identify opportunities and limitations of adopting POCKIT™ Central for screening and diagnostic testing purposes. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care PCR testing in care homes can be considered with appropriate preparatory steps and safeguards. Further diagnostic accuracy evaluations and in-service evaluation studies should be conducted, if the test is to be implemented more widely, to build greater certainty on this initial exploratory analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8083194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80831942021-05-03 Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 Micocci, Massimo Gordon, Adam L Seo, Mikyung Kelly Allen, A Joy Davies, Kerrie Lasserson, Dan Thompson, Carl Spilsbury, Karen Akrill, Cyd Heath, Ros Astle, Anita Sharpe, Claire Perera, Rafael Hayward, Gail Buckle, Peter Age Ageing Research Paper INTRODUCTION: Reliable rapid testing for COVID-19 is needed in care homes to reduce the risk of outbreaks and enable timely care. This study aimed to examine the usability and test performance of a point of care polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 (POCKIT(TM) Central) in care homes. METHODS: POCKIT(TM) Central was evaluated in a purposeful sample of four UK care homes. Test agreement with laboratory real-time PCR and usability and used errors were assessed. RESULTS: No significant usability-related hazards emerged, and the sources of error identified were found to be amendable with minor changes in training or test workflow. POCKIT(TM) Central has acceptable sensitivity and specificity based on RT-PCR as the reference standard, especially for symptomatic cases. Asymptomatic specimens showed 83.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.9–99.6%) positive agreement and 98.7% negative agreement (95% CI: 96.2–99.7%), with overall prevalence and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) of 0.965 (95% CI: 0.932– 0.999). Symptomatic specimens showed 100% (95% CI: 2.5–100%) positive agreement and 100% negative agreement (95% CI: 85.8–100%), with overall PABAK of 1. Recommendations are provided to mitigate the frequency of occurrence of the residual use errors observed. Integration pathways were discussed to identify opportunities and limitations of adopting POCKIT™ Central for screening and diagnostic testing purposes. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care PCR testing in care homes can be considered with appropriate preparatory steps and safeguards. Further diagnostic accuracy evaluations and in-service evaluation studies should be conducted, if the test is to be implemented more widely, to build greater certainty on this initial exploratory analysis. Oxford University Press 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8083194/ /pubmed/33884411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab072 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research Paper
Micocci, Massimo
Gordon, Adam L
Seo, Mikyung Kelly
Allen, A Joy
Davies, Kerrie
Lasserson, Dan
Thompson, Carl
Spilsbury, Karen
Akrill, Cyd
Heath, Ros
Astle, Anita
Sharpe, Claire
Perera, Rafael
Hayward, Gail
Buckle, Peter
Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2
title Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2
title_full Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2
title_short Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2
title_sort is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in england? an exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for sars-cov-2
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8083194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33884411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab072
work_keys_str_mv AT micoccimassimo ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT gordonadaml ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT seomikyungkelly ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT allenajoy ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT davieskerrie ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT lassersondan ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT thompsoncarl ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT spilsburykaren ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT akrillcyd ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT heathros ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT astleanita ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT sharpeclaire ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT pererarafael ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT haywardgail ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2
AT bucklepeter ispointofcaretestingfeasibleandsafeincarehomesinenglandanexploratoryusabilityandaccuracyevaluationofapointofcarepolymerasechainreactiontestforsarscov2