Cargando…

P81 Mental Health Presentations to a UK Tertiary Children’s Emergency Department during the Covid-19 Pandemic in 2020 compared to 2019

INTRODUCTION: Observational study exploring the differences between the number and severity of mental health presentations to a Children’s Emergency Department over a 2-month period during the Covid-19 Pandemic (2020) compared to the same months in 2019. Additionally, exploration of the possible imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Groome, Rachel, Jain, Neha, Henderson, Sally, Green, Michelle, Hand, Catriona, Cuellar, Bianca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8083467/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.080
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Observational study exploring the differences between the number and severity of mental health presentations to a Children’s Emergency Department over a 2-month period during the Covid-19 Pandemic (2020) compared to the same months in 2019. Additionally, exploration of the possible impact of the introduction of a hotline giving clinicians access to 24/7 Children’s and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) advice. METHODS: Identification of mental health presentations in children ≤ 16 years from coded admission data. Data collected included basic demographics, presenting complaint, final diagnosis, mental health Risk Assessment Matrix (RAM) outcome and timings of review, referral and discharge. RESULTS: 141 cases were examined (2019 - n = 79, 2020 - n = 62). During the Covid-19 pandemic 18.9% (n = 10) scored high on the RAM and 64.2% (n = 34) scored moderate whilst in 2019, 17.2% (n = 11) scored high on the RAM and 69.4% (n = 38) scored moderate. 2019 data saw 25.3% (n = 20) discharged directly compared to 37.1% (n = 23) in 2020. In 2020, 26 (42.6%) of CAMHS reviews were via telephone compared to nine (12.3%) in 2019. Overnight (20:00-08:00), in 2019, there were 37 (46.8%) presentations, 86.5% (n = 32) of which required admission and in 2020 there were 36 (58.1%) where 75.0% (n = 27) required admission. CONCLUSION: A higher number of presentations was not seen in the CED despite the potentially adverse psychological effects caused by enforced isolation due to Covid-19. The provision of a 24/7 hotline may have contributed to clinician’s decision to discharge, aiding a higher number of out of hours discharges.