Cargando…

Comparison of Subcutaneous and Vaginal Progesterone Used for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles

OBJECTIVE: Luteal phase defect in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) is a sign of uterine failure due to insufficient progesterone effects on the endometrium. This study aims to compare the success rate and side effects of subcutaneous progesterone and vaginal progesterone to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salehpour, Saghar, Saharkhiz, Nasrin, Nazari, Leila, Sobhaneian, Ali, Hosseini, Sedighe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8083861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33576204
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200090
_version_ 1783686040692719616
author Salehpour, Saghar
Saharkhiz, Nasrin
Nazari, Leila
Sobhaneian, Ali
Hosseini, Sedighe
author_facet Salehpour, Saghar
Saharkhiz, Nasrin
Nazari, Leila
Sobhaneian, Ali
Hosseini, Sedighe
author_sort Salehpour, Saghar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Luteal phase defect in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) is a sign of uterine failure due to insufficient progesterone effects on the endometrium. This study aims to compare the success rate and side effects of subcutaneous progesterone and vaginal progesterone to support the luteal phase in ART cycles. METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, we used the traditional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and we transferred one or two 4-8 cell fetuses based on the patient’s age on the third day of inoculation. We started with luteal phase support from the day of oocyte recovery and the patients randomly received either a daily dose of 25mg subcutaneous progesterone (Prolutex, IBSA Switzerland) or a 400mg dose of vaginal progesterone (Cyclogest, Actoverco, United Kingdom) every 12 hours. If blood BHCG pregnancy test was positive, support for the luteal phase continued until week 10 of gestation. The measured outcomes were the clinical, chemical and ongoing pregnancy rates as well as the rate of early abortion, patients’ acceptance, tolerance and satisfaction. RESULTS: The results of the present study showed that there was no statistically significant difference between clinical, chemical and ongoing pregnancy rates - as well as the rate of early abortion, and patients’ satisfaction when comparing the two treatment Groups. CONCLUSIONS: it seems that the subcutaneous form of progesterone can be used in patients who are not willing to use vaginal progesterone, with similar treatment results and patient satisfaction, when compared to vaginal progesterone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8083861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80838612021-05-05 Comparison of Subcutaneous and Vaginal Progesterone Used for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles Salehpour, Saghar Saharkhiz, Nasrin Nazari, Leila Sobhaneian, Ali Hosseini, Sedighe JBRA Assist Reprod Original Article OBJECTIVE: Luteal phase defect in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) is a sign of uterine failure due to insufficient progesterone effects on the endometrium. This study aims to compare the success rate and side effects of subcutaneous progesterone and vaginal progesterone to support the luteal phase in ART cycles. METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, we used the traditional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and we transferred one or two 4-8 cell fetuses based on the patient’s age on the third day of inoculation. We started with luteal phase support from the day of oocyte recovery and the patients randomly received either a daily dose of 25mg subcutaneous progesterone (Prolutex, IBSA Switzerland) or a 400mg dose of vaginal progesterone (Cyclogest, Actoverco, United Kingdom) every 12 hours. If blood BHCG pregnancy test was positive, support for the luteal phase continued until week 10 of gestation. The measured outcomes were the clinical, chemical and ongoing pregnancy rates as well as the rate of early abortion, patients’ acceptance, tolerance and satisfaction. RESULTS: The results of the present study showed that there was no statistically significant difference between clinical, chemical and ongoing pregnancy rates - as well as the rate of early abortion, and patients’ satisfaction when comparing the two treatment Groups. CONCLUSIONS: it seems that the subcutaneous form of progesterone can be used in patients who are not willing to use vaginal progesterone, with similar treatment results and patient satisfaction, when compared to vaginal progesterone. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8083861/ /pubmed/33576204 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200090 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Salehpour, Saghar
Saharkhiz, Nasrin
Nazari, Leila
Sobhaneian, Ali
Hosseini, Sedighe
Comparison of Subcutaneous and Vaginal Progesterone Used for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles
title Comparison of Subcutaneous and Vaginal Progesterone Used for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles
title_full Comparison of Subcutaneous and Vaginal Progesterone Used for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles
title_fullStr Comparison of Subcutaneous and Vaginal Progesterone Used for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Subcutaneous and Vaginal Progesterone Used for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles
title_short Comparison of Subcutaneous and Vaginal Progesterone Used for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles
title_sort comparison of subcutaneous and vaginal progesterone used for luteal phase support in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8083861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33576204
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200090
work_keys_str_mv AT salehpoursaghar comparisonofsubcutaneousandvaginalprogesteroneusedforlutealphasesupportinpatientsundergoingintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT saharkhiznasrin comparisonofsubcutaneousandvaginalprogesteroneusedforlutealphasesupportinpatientsundergoingintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT nazarileila comparisonofsubcutaneousandvaginalprogesteroneusedforlutealphasesupportinpatientsundergoingintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT sobhaneianali comparisonofsubcutaneousandvaginalprogesteroneusedforlutealphasesupportinpatientsundergoingintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT hosseinisedighe comparisonofsubcutaneousandvaginalprogesteroneusedforlutealphasesupportinpatientsundergoingintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles