Cargando…

A randomized phase II trial comparing capecitabine with oxaliplatin or docetaxel as first-line treatment in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND: A combination of fluoropyrimidines and platinum is widely accepted as the standard first-line treatment for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. However, the benefit compared with platinum-free chemotherapeutic regimens remains controversial. We compared the efficacy an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ni, Lu, Zhang, Weihan, Chen, Ye, Leng, Weibing, Gou, Hongfeng, Hu, Jiankun, Qiu, Meng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025493
_version_ 1783686069976301568
author Ni, Lu
Zhang, Weihan
Chen, Ye
Leng, Weibing
Gou, Hongfeng
Hu, Jiankun
Qiu, Meng
author_facet Ni, Lu
Zhang, Weihan
Chen, Ye
Leng, Weibing
Gou, Hongfeng
Hu, Jiankun
Qiu, Meng
author_sort Ni, Lu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A combination of fluoropyrimidines and platinum is widely accepted as the standard first-line treatment for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. However, the benefit compared with platinum-free chemotherapeutic regimens remains controversial. We compared the efficacy and safety of capecitabine with oxaliplatin or docetaxel, as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2); twice daily for 14 days with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 21 days), or DX (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2); twice daily for 14 days with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 21 days). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival, overall survival, and prespecified safety endpoints. RESULTS: Ninety patients were enrolled in the West China Hospital from April 2012 to August 2016; a total of 83 and 66 patients were eligible for safety and efficacy analyses, respectively. Between the XELOX and DX groups, ORR (24.2% vs 24.2%, p = 1.000), DCR (90.9% vs 75.8%, p = 0.099), progression-free survival (6.1m vs 4.1m, p = 0.346), and overall survival (8.8m vs 9.0m, p = 0.973) were similar. There was no significant difference in toxicity between the two regimens. The frequent grade 3 or higher toxicities in the XELOX and DX groups were peripheral neuropathy and hematological toxicity, respectively. Toxicity was tolerable; no treatment-related deaths occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The DX regimen was not superior to XELOX, but instead, similar. The platinum-containing regimen remains the preferred first-line option for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas, and DX might be considered as an alternative for patients unsuitable for platinum-containing chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8084035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80840352021-05-01 A randomized phase II trial comparing capecitabine with oxaliplatin or docetaxel as first-line treatment in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas Ni, Lu Zhang, Weihan Chen, Ye Leng, Weibing Gou, Hongfeng Hu, Jiankun Qiu, Meng Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 BACKGROUND: A combination of fluoropyrimidines and platinum is widely accepted as the standard first-line treatment for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. However, the benefit compared with platinum-free chemotherapeutic regimens remains controversial. We compared the efficacy and safety of capecitabine with oxaliplatin or docetaxel, as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2); twice daily for 14 days with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 21 days), or DX (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2); twice daily for 14 days with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 21 days). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival, overall survival, and prespecified safety endpoints. RESULTS: Ninety patients were enrolled in the West China Hospital from April 2012 to August 2016; a total of 83 and 66 patients were eligible for safety and efficacy analyses, respectively. Between the XELOX and DX groups, ORR (24.2% vs 24.2%, p = 1.000), DCR (90.9% vs 75.8%, p = 0.099), progression-free survival (6.1m vs 4.1m, p = 0.346), and overall survival (8.8m vs 9.0m, p = 0.973) were similar. There was no significant difference in toxicity between the two regimens. The frequent grade 3 or higher toxicities in the XELOX and DX groups were peripheral neuropathy and hematological toxicity, respectively. Toxicity was tolerable; no treatment-related deaths occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The DX regimen was not superior to XELOX, but instead, similar. The platinum-containing regimen remains the preferred first-line option for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas, and DX might be considered as an alternative for patients unsuitable for platinum-containing chemotherapy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8084035/ /pubmed/33907099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025493 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 5700
Ni, Lu
Zhang, Weihan
Chen, Ye
Leng, Weibing
Gou, Hongfeng
Hu, Jiankun
Qiu, Meng
A randomized phase II trial comparing capecitabine with oxaliplatin or docetaxel as first-line treatment in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas
title A randomized phase II trial comparing capecitabine with oxaliplatin or docetaxel as first-line treatment in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas
title_full A randomized phase II trial comparing capecitabine with oxaliplatin or docetaxel as first-line treatment in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas
title_fullStr A randomized phase II trial comparing capecitabine with oxaliplatin or docetaxel as first-line treatment in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas
title_full_unstemmed A randomized phase II trial comparing capecitabine with oxaliplatin or docetaxel as first-line treatment in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas
title_short A randomized phase II trial comparing capecitabine with oxaliplatin or docetaxel as first-line treatment in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas
title_sort randomized phase ii trial comparing capecitabine with oxaliplatin or docetaxel as first-line treatment in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025493
work_keys_str_mv AT nilu arandomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT zhangweihan arandomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT chenye arandomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT lengweibing arandomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT gouhongfeng arandomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT hujiankun arandomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT qiumeng arandomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT nilu randomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT zhangweihan randomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT chenye randomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT lengweibing randomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT gouhongfeng randomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT hujiankun randomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT qiumeng randomizedphaseiitrialcomparingcapecitabinewithoxaliplatinordocetaxelasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedgastricandgastroesophagealadenocarcinomas