Cargando…

Apatinib combined with S-1 as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer

Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients are not tolerant to the toxicities of traditional chemotherapy and its second-line therapeutic regimens are limited. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 as the second-line therapy for AGC patients. P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiu, Zhi-Yuan, Qin, Rong, Tian, Guang-Yu, Zhang, Zhao, Chen, Meifang, He, Han, Xi, Yan, Wang, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025630
_version_ 1783686081336573952
author Qiu, Zhi-Yuan
Qin, Rong
Tian, Guang-Yu
Zhang, Zhao
Chen, Meifang
He, Han
Xi, Yan
Wang, Yan
author_facet Qiu, Zhi-Yuan
Qin, Rong
Tian, Guang-Yu
Zhang, Zhao
Chen, Meifang
He, Han
Xi, Yan
Wang, Yan
author_sort Qiu, Zhi-Yuan
collection PubMed
description Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients are not tolerant to the toxicities of traditional chemotherapy and its second-line therapeutic regimens are limited. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 as the second-line therapy for AGC patients. Patients with AGC were enrolled in this study. Patients received oral apatinib (250 mg to 500 mg once daily) and S-1(40 mg/m(2) twice daily) on days 1–14. Each cycle was 28 days and one course of treatment consisted of 2 cycles. Clinical efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were observed. Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival analysis. From November 2015 to December 2017, 58 AGC patients who failed first-line chemotherapy were enrolled and assessed retrospectively. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) standard, all patients were evaluable for response. None achieved CR, and 10 (17.2%) achieved PR (95% CI 7.2%–27.3%). SD was observed in 58.6% (34/58) of patients (95% CI 45.6%–71.7%) and NR in 24.1% (14/58) of patients (95% CI 12.8%–35.5%). The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 17.2% and 75.8% respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 143.1 days (95% CI 121.7–164.5) and 211.6 days (95% CI 162.9–219.7) respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that the ECOG PS was the independent factor of PFS and OS for AGC patients (PFS: HR = 3.565, 95% CI: 2.25–5.65, P < .001; OS: HR = 3.676, 95% CI: 2.29–5.89, P < .001). The main AEs were fatigue (72.4%), hypertension (46.6%), and leukopenia (48.3%). Apatinib combined with S-1 showed promising efficiency and was well tolerated as the second-line therapy for AGC patients. ECOG PS was the independent factor of PFS and OS for AGC patients. AEs were moderate and controllable, and leukopenia or hypertension was predictable factors for the PFS and OS of AGC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8084084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80840842021-05-01 Apatinib combined with S-1 as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer Qiu, Zhi-Yuan Qin, Rong Tian, Guang-Yu Zhang, Zhao Chen, Meifang He, Han Xi, Yan Wang, Yan Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients are not tolerant to the toxicities of traditional chemotherapy and its second-line therapeutic regimens are limited. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 as the second-line therapy for AGC patients. Patients with AGC were enrolled in this study. Patients received oral apatinib (250 mg to 500 mg once daily) and S-1(40 mg/m(2) twice daily) on days 1–14. Each cycle was 28 days and one course of treatment consisted of 2 cycles. Clinical efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were observed. Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival analysis. From November 2015 to December 2017, 58 AGC patients who failed first-line chemotherapy were enrolled and assessed retrospectively. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) standard, all patients were evaluable for response. None achieved CR, and 10 (17.2%) achieved PR (95% CI 7.2%–27.3%). SD was observed in 58.6% (34/58) of patients (95% CI 45.6%–71.7%) and NR in 24.1% (14/58) of patients (95% CI 12.8%–35.5%). The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 17.2% and 75.8% respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 143.1 days (95% CI 121.7–164.5) and 211.6 days (95% CI 162.9–219.7) respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that the ECOG PS was the independent factor of PFS and OS for AGC patients (PFS: HR = 3.565, 95% CI: 2.25–5.65, P < .001; OS: HR = 3.676, 95% CI: 2.29–5.89, P < .001). The main AEs were fatigue (72.4%), hypertension (46.6%), and leukopenia (48.3%). Apatinib combined with S-1 showed promising efficiency and was well tolerated as the second-line therapy for AGC patients. ECOG PS was the independent factor of PFS and OS for AGC patients. AEs were moderate and controllable, and leukopenia or hypertension was predictable factors for the PFS and OS of AGC patients. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8084084/ /pubmed/33907117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025630 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 5700
Qiu, Zhi-Yuan
Qin, Rong
Tian, Guang-Yu
Zhang, Zhao
Chen, Meifang
He, Han
Xi, Yan
Wang, Yan
Apatinib combined with S-1 as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer
title Apatinib combined with S-1 as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer
title_full Apatinib combined with S-1 as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer
title_fullStr Apatinib combined with S-1 as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Apatinib combined with S-1 as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer
title_short Apatinib combined with S-1 as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer
title_sort apatinib combined with s-1 as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025630
work_keys_str_mv AT qiuzhiyuan apatinibcombinedwiths1assecondlinetherapyinadvancedgastriccancer
AT qinrong apatinibcombinedwiths1assecondlinetherapyinadvancedgastriccancer
AT tianguangyu apatinibcombinedwiths1assecondlinetherapyinadvancedgastriccancer
AT zhangzhao apatinibcombinedwiths1assecondlinetherapyinadvancedgastriccancer
AT chenmeifang apatinibcombinedwiths1assecondlinetherapyinadvancedgastriccancer
AT hehan apatinibcombinedwiths1assecondlinetherapyinadvancedgastriccancer
AT xiyan apatinibcombinedwiths1assecondlinetherapyinadvancedgastriccancer
AT wangyan apatinibcombinedwiths1assecondlinetherapyinadvancedgastriccancer