Cargando…
Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture
An extensive body of work has shown that attentional capture is contingent on the goals of the observer: Capture is strongly reduced or even eliminated when an irrelevant singleton stimulus does not match the target-defining properties (Folk et al., 1992). There has been a long-standing debate on wh...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117562 |
_version_ | 1783686086838452224 |
---|---|
author | Munneke, Jaap Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus Sutterer, David Theeuwes, Jan Awh, Edward |
author_facet | Munneke, Jaap Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus Sutterer, David Theeuwes, Jan Awh, Edward |
author_sort | Munneke, Jaap |
collection | PubMed |
description | An extensive body of work has shown that attentional capture is contingent on the goals of the observer: Capture is strongly reduced or even eliminated when an irrelevant singleton stimulus does not match the target-defining properties (Folk et al., 1992). There has been a long-standing debate on whether attentional capture can be explained by goal-driven and/or stimulus-driven accounts. Here, we shed further light on this matter by using EEG activity (raw EEG and alpha power) to provide a time-resolved index of attentional orienting towards salient stimuli that either matched or did not match target-defining properties. A search display containing the target stimulus was preceded by a spatially uninformative singleton cue that either matched the color of the upcoming target (contingent cues), or that appeared in an irrelevant color (non-contingent cues). Multivariate analysis of raw EEG and alpha power revealed preferential tuning to the location of both contingent and non-contingent cues, with a stronger bias towards contingent than non-contingent cues. The time course of these effects, however, depended on the neural signal. Raw EEG data revealed attentional orienting towards the contingent cue early on in the trial (>156 ms), while alpha power revealed sustained spatial selection in the cued locations at a later moment in the trial (>250 ms). Moreover, while raw EEG showed stronger capture by contingent cues during this early time window, an advantage for contingent cues arose during a later time window in alpha band activity. Thus, our findings suggest that raw EEG activity and alpha-band power tap into distinct neural processes that index separate aspects of covert spatial attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8084109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80841092021-04-29 Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture Munneke, Jaap Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus Sutterer, David Theeuwes, Jan Awh, Edward Neuroimage Article An extensive body of work has shown that attentional capture is contingent on the goals of the observer: Capture is strongly reduced or even eliminated when an irrelevant singleton stimulus does not match the target-defining properties (Folk et al., 1992). There has been a long-standing debate on whether attentional capture can be explained by goal-driven and/or stimulus-driven accounts. Here, we shed further light on this matter by using EEG activity (raw EEG and alpha power) to provide a time-resolved index of attentional orienting towards salient stimuli that either matched or did not match target-defining properties. A search display containing the target stimulus was preceded by a spatially uninformative singleton cue that either matched the color of the upcoming target (contingent cues), or that appeared in an irrelevant color (non-contingent cues). Multivariate analysis of raw EEG and alpha power revealed preferential tuning to the location of both contingent and non-contingent cues, with a stronger bias towards contingent than non-contingent cues. The time course of these effects, however, depended on the neural signal. Raw EEG data revealed attentional orienting towards the contingent cue early on in the trial (>156 ms), while alpha power revealed sustained spatial selection in the cued locations at a later moment in the trial (>250 ms). Moreover, while raw EEG showed stronger capture by contingent cues during this early time window, an advantage for contingent cues arose during a later time window in alpha band activity. Thus, our findings suggest that raw EEG activity and alpha-band power tap into distinct neural processes that index separate aspects of covert spatial attention. 2020-11-12 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8084109/ /pubmed/33189931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117562 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Article Munneke, Jaap Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus Sutterer, David Theeuwes, Jan Awh, Edward Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture |
title | Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture |
title_full | Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture |
title_fullStr | Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture |
title_full_unstemmed | Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture |
title_short | Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture |
title_sort | multivariate analysis of eeg activity indexes contingent attentional capture |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117562 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munnekejaap multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture AT fahrenfortjohannesjacobus multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture AT suttererdavid multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture AT theeuwesjan multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture AT awhedward multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture |