Cargando…
Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket
OBJECTIVE: This pre-post study is aimed at determining the effects of masticatory muscle activity (masseter and temporalis) measured via sEMG between conventional, self-ligating, and ceramic bracket after six months of orthodontic treatment. METHODS: A total of eighteen (18) malocclusion patients we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6642254 |
_version_ | 1783686198551642112 |
---|---|
author | Nishi, Shamima E. Rahman, Norma Ab Basri, Rehana Alam, Mohammad K. Noor, Nor Farid M. Zainal, Siti Aishah Husein, Adam |
author_facet | Nishi, Shamima E. Rahman, Norma Ab Basri, Rehana Alam, Mohammad K. Noor, Nor Farid M. Zainal, Siti Aishah Husein, Adam |
author_sort | Nishi, Shamima E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This pre-post study is aimed at determining the effects of masticatory muscle activity (masseter and temporalis) measured via sEMG between conventional, self-ligating, and ceramic bracket after six months of orthodontic treatment. METHODS: A total of eighteen (18) malocclusion patients were identified. Malocclusion patients were subdivided into 3 groups based on the bracket selection (conventional, self-ligating, and ceramic bracket) with 6 patients for each group. sEMG of muscles were done using a two-channel electromyography device, where pregelled and self-adhesive electrodes (bilateral) were applied. Chewing and clenching of masseter and temporalis muscle activity were recorded for 20 s pre and 6 months of orthodontic treatment using sEMG (frequency 60 Hz). The data were analysed by using repeated measures ANOVA in IBM SPSS Statistics Version 24.0. RESULTS: Chewing and clenching for masseter muscle showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) in sEMG activity of three types of the brackets. However, for temporalis muscle, there was a significant difference found in sEMG activity during chewing (P < 0.05) and clenching (P < 0.05) between these three brackets. CONCLUSION: The activity of temporalis muscle showed significant changes in chewing and clenching, where the conventional group demonstrated better muscle activity pre and at six months of fixed appliances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8084656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80846562021-05-06 Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket Nishi, Shamima E. Rahman, Norma Ab Basri, Rehana Alam, Mohammad K. Noor, Nor Farid M. Zainal, Siti Aishah Husein, Adam Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: This pre-post study is aimed at determining the effects of masticatory muscle activity (masseter and temporalis) measured via sEMG between conventional, self-ligating, and ceramic bracket after six months of orthodontic treatment. METHODS: A total of eighteen (18) malocclusion patients were identified. Malocclusion patients were subdivided into 3 groups based on the bracket selection (conventional, self-ligating, and ceramic bracket) with 6 patients for each group. sEMG of muscles were done using a two-channel electromyography device, where pregelled and self-adhesive electrodes (bilateral) were applied. Chewing and clenching of masseter and temporalis muscle activity were recorded for 20 s pre and 6 months of orthodontic treatment using sEMG (frequency 60 Hz). The data were analysed by using repeated measures ANOVA in IBM SPSS Statistics Version 24.0. RESULTS: Chewing and clenching for masseter muscle showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) in sEMG activity of three types of the brackets. However, for temporalis muscle, there was a significant difference found in sEMG activity during chewing (P < 0.05) and clenching (P < 0.05) between these three brackets. CONCLUSION: The activity of temporalis muscle showed significant changes in chewing and clenching, where the conventional group demonstrated better muscle activity pre and at six months of fixed appliances. Hindawi 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8084656/ /pubmed/33969121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6642254 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shamima E. Nishi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nishi, Shamima E. Rahman, Norma Ab Basri, Rehana Alam, Mohammad K. Noor, Nor Farid M. Zainal, Siti Aishah Husein, Adam Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket |
title | Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket |
title_full | Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket |
title_fullStr | Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket |
title_short | Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket |
title_sort | surface electromyography (semg) activity of masticatory muscle (masseter and temporalis) with three different types of orthodontic bracket |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6642254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nishishamimae surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket AT rahmannormaab surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket AT basrirehana surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket AT alammohammadk surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket AT noornorfaridm surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket AT zainalsitiaishah surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket AT huseinadam surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket |