Cargando…

Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket

OBJECTIVE: This pre-post study is aimed at determining the effects of masticatory muscle activity (masseter and temporalis) measured via sEMG between conventional, self-ligating, and ceramic bracket after six months of orthodontic treatment. METHODS: A total of eighteen (18) malocclusion patients we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishi, Shamima E., Rahman, Norma Ab, Basri, Rehana, Alam, Mohammad K., Noor, Nor Farid M., Zainal, Siti Aishah, Husein, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6642254
_version_ 1783686198551642112
author Nishi, Shamima E.
Rahman, Norma Ab
Basri, Rehana
Alam, Mohammad K.
Noor, Nor Farid M.
Zainal, Siti Aishah
Husein, Adam
author_facet Nishi, Shamima E.
Rahman, Norma Ab
Basri, Rehana
Alam, Mohammad K.
Noor, Nor Farid M.
Zainal, Siti Aishah
Husein, Adam
author_sort Nishi, Shamima E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This pre-post study is aimed at determining the effects of masticatory muscle activity (masseter and temporalis) measured via sEMG between conventional, self-ligating, and ceramic bracket after six months of orthodontic treatment. METHODS: A total of eighteen (18) malocclusion patients were identified. Malocclusion patients were subdivided into 3 groups based on the bracket selection (conventional, self-ligating, and ceramic bracket) with 6 patients for each group. sEMG of muscles were done using a two-channel electromyography device, where pregelled and self-adhesive electrodes (bilateral) were applied. Chewing and clenching of masseter and temporalis muscle activity were recorded for 20 s pre and 6 months of orthodontic treatment using sEMG (frequency 60 Hz). The data were analysed by using repeated measures ANOVA in IBM SPSS Statistics Version 24.0. RESULTS: Chewing and clenching for masseter muscle showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) in sEMG activity of three types of the brackets. However, for temporalis muscle, there was a significant difference found in sEMG activity during chewing (P < 0.05) and clenching (P < 0.05) between these three brackets. CONCLUSION: The activity of temporalis muscle showed significant changes in chewing and clenching, where the conventional group demonstrated better muscle activity pre and at six months of fixed appliances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8084656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80846562021-05-06 Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket Nishi, Shamima E. Rahman, Norma Ab Basri, Rehana Alam, Mohammad K. Noor, Nor Farid M. Zainal, Siti Aishah Husein, Adam Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: This pre-post study is aimed at determining the effects of masticatory muscle activity (masseter and temporalis) measured via sEMG between conventional, self-ligating, and ceramic bracket after six months of orthodontic treatment. METHODS: A total of eighteen (18) malocclusion patients were identified. Malocclusion patients were subdivided into 3 groups based on the bracket selection (conventional, self-ligating, and ceramic bracket) with 6 patients for each group. sEMG of muscles were done using a two-channel electromyography device, where pregelled and self-adhesive electrodes (bilateral) were applied. Chewing and clenching of masseter and temporalis muscle activity were recorded for 20 s pre and 6 months of orthodontic treatment using sEMG (frequency 60 Hz). The data were analysed by using repeated measures ANOVA in IBM SPSS Statistics Version 24.0. RESULTS: Chewing and clenching for masseter muscle showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) in sEMG activity of three types of the brackets. However, for temporalis muscle, there was a significant difference found in sEMG activity during chewing (P < 0.05) and clenching (P < 0.05) between these three brackets. CONCLUSION: The activity of temporalis muscle showed significant changes in chewing and clenching, where the conventional group demonstrated better muscle activity pre and at six months of fixed appliances. Hindawi 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8084656/ /pubmed/33969121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6642254 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shamima E. Nishi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nishi, Shamima E.
Rahman, Norma Ab
Basri, Rehana
Alam, Mohammad K.
Noor, Nor Farid M.
Zainal, Siti Aishah
Husein, Adam
Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket
title Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket
title_full Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket
title_fullStr Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket
title_full_unstemmed Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket
title_short Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Activity of Masticatory Muscle (Masseter and Temporalis) with Three Different Types of Orthodontic Bracket
title_sort surface electromyography (semg) activity of masticatory muscle (masseter and temporalis) with three different types of orthodontic bracket
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6642254
work_keys_str_mv AT nishishamimae surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket
AT rahmannormaab surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket
AT basrirehana surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket
AT alammohammadk surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket
AT noornorfaridm surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket
AT zainalsitiaishah surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket
AT huseinadam surfaceelectromyographysemgactivityofmasticatorymusclemasseterandtemporaliswiththreedifferenttypesoforthodonticbracket