Cargando…

Flow parsing and biological motion

Flow parsing is a way to estimate the direction of scene-relative motion of independently moving objects during self-motion of the observer. So far, this has been tested for simple geometric shapes such as dots or bars. Whether further cues such as prior knowledge about typical directions of an obje...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayer, Katja M., Riddell, Hugh, Lappe, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33629261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02217-6
_version_ 1783686224563666944
author Mayer, Katja M.
Riddell, Hugh
Lappe, Markus
author_facet Mayer, Katja M.
Riddell, Hugh
Lappe, Markus
author_sort Mayer, Katja M.
collection PubMed
description Flow parsing is a way to estimate the direction of scene-relative motion of independently moving objects during self-motion of the observer. So far, this has been tested for simple geometric shapes such as dots or bars. Whether further cues such as prior knowledge about typical directions of an object’s movement, e.g., typical human motion, are considered in the estimations is currently unclear. Here, we adjudicated between the theory that the direction of scene-relative motion of humans is estimated exclusively by flow parsing, just like for simple geometric objects, and the theory that prior knowledge about biological motion affects estimation of perceived direction of scene-relative motion of humans. We placed a human point-light walker in optic flow fields that simulated forward motion of the observer. We introduced conflicts between biological features of the walker (i.e., facing and articulation) and the direction of scene-relative motion. We investigated whether perceived direction of scene-relative motion was biased towards biological features and compared the results to perceived direction of scene-relative motion of scrambled walkers and dot clouds. We found that for humans the perceived direction of scene-relative motion was biased towards biological features. Additionally, we found larger flow parsing gain for humans compared to the other walker types. This indicates that flow parsing is not the only visual mechanism relevant for estimating the direction of scene-relative motion of independently moving objects during self-motion: observers also rely on prior knowledge about typical object motion, such as typical facing and articulation of humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8084786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80847862021-05-05 Flow parsing and biological motion Mayer, Katja M. Riddell, Hugh Lappe, Markus Atten Percept Psychophys Article Flow parsing is a way to estimate the direction of scene-relative motion of independently moving objects during self-motion of the observer. So far, this has been tested for simple geometric shapes such as dots or bars. Whether further cues such as prior knowledge about typical directions of an object’s movement, e.g., typical human motion, are considered in the estimations is currently unclear. Here, we adjudicated between the theory that the direction of scene-relative motion of humans is estimated exclusively by flow parsing, just like for simple geometric objects, and the theory that prior knowledge about biological motion affects estimation of perceived direction of scene-relative motion of humans. We placed a human point-light walker in optic flow fields that simulated forward motion of the observer. We introduced conflicts between biological features of the walker (i.e., facing and articulation) and the direction of scene-relative motion. We investigated whether perceived direction of scene-relative motion was biased towards biological features and compared the results to perceived direction of scene-relative motion of scrambled walkers and dot clouds. We found that for humans the perceived direction of scene-relative motion was biased towards biological features. Additionally, we found larger flow parsing gain for humans compared to the other walker types. This indicates that flow parsing is not the only visual mechanism relevant for estimating the direction of scene-relative motion of independently moving objects during self-motion: observers also rely on prior knowledge about typical object motion, such as typical facing and articulation of humans. Springer US 2021-02-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8084786/ /pubmed/33629261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02217-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Mayer, Katja M.
Riddell, Hugh
Lappe, Markus
Flow parsing and biological motion
title Flow parsing and biological motion
title_full Flow parsing and biological motion
title_fullStr Flow parsing and biological motion
title_full_unstemmed Flow parsing and biological motion
title_short Flow parsing and biological motion
title_sort flow parsing and biological motion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33629261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02217-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mayerkatjam flowparsingandbiologicalmotion
AT riddellhugh flowparsingandbiologicalmotion
AT lappemarkus flowparsingandbiologicalmotion