Cargando…
Response to Zamani et al. (2020): The omission of critical data in the pursuit of “revolutionary” methods to accelerate the description of species
Here we respond to the criticisms leveled against a proposal that suggested an efficient solution to the taxonomic impediment. We clarify some of our objectives and demonstrate that many of the criticisms apply more to traditional approaches to taxonomy rather than to our minimalist approach.
Autores principales: | Sharkey, Michael, Brown, Brian, Baker, Austin, Mutanen, Marko |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pensoft Publishers
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33958926 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1033.66186 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Corrigenda: Omission of the Description of Informed Consent
Publicado: (2019) -
Molecular characterization of the ribosomal DNA unit of Sarcocystis
singaporensis, Sarcocystis zamani and Sarcocystis
zuoi from rodents in Thailand
por: WATTHANAKAIWAN, Vichan, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021
por: Sharkey, Michael J., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Revolutionary Science
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Omission
Publicado: (1881)