Cargando…

Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Several authors have suggested that implants can be placed simultaneously with onlay bone grafts without affecting outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to answer the following clinical questions: (1) What are the outcomes of implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay bone gra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Guoqiang, Wu, Chaoan, Shao, Miaoting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33928458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00311-4
_version_ 1783686277841813504
author Ma, Guoqiang
Wu, Chaoan
Shao, Miaoting
author_facet Ma, Guoqiang
Wu, Chaoan
Shao, Miaoting
author_sort Ma, Guoqiang
collection PubMed
description Several authors have suggested that implants can be placed simultaneously with onlay bone grafts without affecting outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to answer the following clinical questions: (1) What are the outcomes of implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay bone grafts? And (2) is there a difference in outcomes between simultaneous vs delayed placement of implants with autogenous onlay bone grafts? Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched up to 15 November 2020. Data on implant survival was extracted from all the included studies (single arm and comparative) to calculate point estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and pooled using the DerSimonian–Laird meta-analysis model. We also compared implant survival rates between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with data from comparative studies. Nineteen studies were included. Five of them compared simultaneous and delayed placement of implants. Dividing the studies based on follow-up duration, the pooled survival of implant placed simultaneously with onlay grafts after <2.5 years of follow-up was 93.1% (95% CI 82.6 to 97.4%) and after 2.5–5 years was 86% (95% CI 78.6 to 91.1%). Implant survival was found to be 85.8% (95% CI 79.6 to 90.3%) with iliac crest grafts and 95.7% (95% CI 83.9 to 93.0%) with intra-oral grafts. Our results indicated no statistically significant difference in implant survival between simultaneous and delayed placement (OR 0.43, 95% 0.07, 2.49, I(2)=59.04%). Data on implant success and bone loss were limited. Data indicates that implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay grafts have a survival rate of 93.1% and 86% after a follow-up of <2.5 years and 2.5–5years respectively. A limited number of studies indicate no significant difference in implant survival between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with onlay bone grafts. There is a need for randomized controlled trials comparing simultaneous and delayed implant placement to provide robust evidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40729-021-00311-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8085156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80851562021-05-05 Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ma, Guoqiang Wu, Chaoan Shao, Miaoting Int J Implant Dent Review Several authors have suggested that implants can be placed simultaneously with onlay bone grafts without affecting outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to answer the following clinical questions: (1) What are the outcomes of implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay bone grafts? And (2) is there a difference in outcomes between simultaneous vs delayed placement of implants with autogenous onlay bone grafts? Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched up to 15 November 2020. Data on implant survival was extracted from all the included studies (single arm and comparative) to calculate point estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and pooled using the DerSimonian–Laird meta-analysis model. We also compared implant survival rates between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with data from comparative studies. Nineteen studies were included. Five of them compared simultaneous and delayed placement of implants. Dividing the studies based on follow-up duration, the pooled survival of implant placed simultaneously with onlay grafts after <2.5 years of follow-up was 93.1% (95% CI 82.6 to 97.4%) and after 2.5–5 years was 86% (95% CI 78.6 to 91.1%). Implant survival was found to be 85.8% (95% CI 79.6 to 90.3%) with iliac crest grafts and 95.7% (95% CI 83.9 to 93.0%) with intra-oral grafts. Our results indicated no statistically significant difference in implant survival between simultaneous and delayed placement (OR 0.43, 95% 0.07, 2.49, I(2)=59.04%). Data on implant success and bone loss were limited. Data indicates that implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay grafts have a survival rate of 93.1% and 86% after a follow-up of <2.5 years and 2.5–5years respectively. A limited number of studies indicate no significant difference in implant survival between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with onlay bone grafts. There is a need for randomized controlled trials comparing simultaneous and delayed implant placement to provide robust evidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40729-021-00311-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8085156/ /pubmed/33928458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00311-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Ma, Guoqiang
Wu, Chaoan
Shao, Miaoting
Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33928458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00311-4
work_keys_str_mv AT maguoqiang simultaneousimplantplacementwithautogenousonlaybonegraftsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuchaoan simultaneousimplantplacementwithautogenousonlaybonegraftsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shaomiaoting simultaneousimplantplacementwithautogenousonlaybonegraftsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis