Cargando…
Stimulus dependence of interocular suppression
Interocular suppression is the phenomenon in which the signal from one eye inhibits the other eye in the presence of dissimilar images. Various clinical and laboratory-based tests have been used to assess suppression, which vary in color, contrast, and stimulus size. These stimulus variations may yi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88701-x |
_version_ | 1783686286457962496 |
---|---|
author | Lew, Wei Hau Stevenson, Scott B. Coates, Daniel R. |
author_facet | Lew, Wei Hau Stevenson, Scott B. Coates, Daniel R. |
author_sort | Lew, Wei Hau |
collection | PubMed |
description | Interocular suppression is the phenomenon in which the signal from one eye inhibits the other eye in the presence of dissimilar images. Various clinical and laboratory-based tests have been used to assess suppression, which vary in color, contrast, and stimulus size. These stimulus variations may yield different spatial extents of suppression, which makes it difficult to compare the outcomes. To evaluate the role of stimulus characteristics, we measured the suppression zone using a binocular rivalry paradigm in normally-sighted observers by systematically varying the stimulus parameters. The stimuli consist of a constantly visible horizontal reference seen by one eye while two vertical suppressors were presented to the other eye. With a keypress, the suppressors appeared for 1 s, to induce a transient suppression zone in the middle part of the reference. Subjects adjusted the width between the suppressors to determine the zone. The zone decreased significantly with increasing spatial frequency and lower contrast. The width was 1.4 times larger than the height. The zone was smaller with negative compared to positive contrast polarity but independent of eye dominance, luminance, and colored filters. A departure from scale invariance was captured with a model suggesting a stimulus-dependent and a small fixed non-stimulus-dependent portion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8085212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80852122021-05-03 Stimulus dependence of interocular suppression Lew, Wei Hau Stevenson, Scott B. Coates, Daniel R. Sci Rep Article Interocular suppression is the phenomenon in which the signal from one eye inhibits the other eye in the presence of dissimilar images. Various clinical and laboratory-based tests have been used to assess suppression, which vary in color, contrast, and stimulus size. These stimulus variations may yield different spatial extents of suppression, which makes it difficult to compare the outcomes. To evaluate the role of stimulus characteristics, we measured the suppression zone using a binocular rivalry paradigm in normally-sighted observers by systematically varying the stimulus parameters. The stimuli consist of a constantly visible horizontal reference seen by one eye while two vertical suppressors were presented to the other eye. With a keypress, the suppressors appeared for 1 s, to induce a transient suppression zone in the middle part of the reference. Subjects adjusted the width between the suppressors to determine the zone. The zone decreased significantly with increasing spatial frequency and lower contrast. The width was 1.4 times larger than the height. The zone was smaller with negative compared to positive contrast polarity but independent of eye dominance, luminance, and colored filters. A departure from scale invariance was captured with a model suggesting a stimulus-dependent and a small fixed non-stimulus-dependent portion. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8085212/ /pubmed/33927294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88701-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Lew, Wei Hau Stevenson, Scott B. Coates, Daniel R. Stimulus dependence of interocular suppression |
title | Stimulus dependence of interocular suppression |
title_full | Stimulus dependence of interocular suppression |
title_fullStr | Stimulus dependence of interocular suppression |
title_full_unstemmed | Stimulus dependence of interocular suppression |
title_short | Stimulus dependence of interocular suppression |
title_sort | stimulus dependence of interocular suppression |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88701-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewweihau stimulusdependenceofinterocularsuppression AT stevensonscottb stimulusdependenceofinterocularsuppression AT coatesdanielr stimulusdependenceofinterocularsuppression |