Cargando…

Evaluating the Reporting Quality of Researcher-Developed Alphabet Knowledge Measures: How Transparent and Replicable Is It?

The American Educational Research Association and American Psychological Association published standards for reporting on research. The transparency of reporting measures and data collection is paramount for interpretability and replicability of research. We analyzed 57 articles that assessed alphab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horner, Sherri L., Shaffer, Sharon A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33935857
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601849
_version_ 1783686315521343488
author Horner, Sherri L.
Shaffer, Sharon A.
author_facet Horner, Sherri L.
Shaffer, Sharon A.
author_sort Horner, Sherri L.
collection PubMed
description The American Educational Research Association and American Psychological Association published standards for reporting on research. The transparency of reporting measures and data collection is paramount for interpretability and replicability of research. We analyzed 57 articles that assessed alphabet knowledge (AK) using researcher-developed measures. The quality of reporting on different elements of AK measures and data collection was not related to the journal type nor to the impact factor or rank of the journal but rather seemed to depend on the individual author, reviewers, and journal editor. We propose various topics related to effective reporting of measures and data collection methods that we encourage the early childhood and literacy communities to discuss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8085332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80853322021-05-01 Evaluating the Reporting Quality of Researcher-Developed Alphabet Knowledge Measures: How Transparent and Replicable Is It? Horner, Sherri L. Shaffer, Sharon A. Front Psychol Psychology The American Educational Research Association and American Psychological Association published standards for reporting on research. The transparency of reporting measures and data collection is paramount for interpretability and replicability of research. We analyzed 57 articles that assessed alphabet knowledge (AK) using researcher-developed measures. The quality of reporting on different elements of AK measures and data collection was not related to the journal type nor to the impact factor or rank of the journal but rather seemed to depend on the individual author, reviewers, and journal editor. We propose various topics related to effective reporting of measures and data collection methods that we encourage the early childhood and literacy communities to discuss. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8085332/ /pubmed/33935857 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601849 Text en Copyright © 2021 Horner and Shaffer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Horner, Sherri L.
Shaffer, Sharon A.
Evaluating the Reporting Quality of Researcher-Developed Alphabet Knowledge Measures: How Transparent and Replicable Is It?
title Evaluating the Reporting Quality of Researcher-Developed Alphabet Knowledge Measures: How Transparent and Replicable Is It?
title_full Evaluating the Reporting Quality of Researcher-Developed Alphabet Knowledge Measures: How Transparent and Replicable Is It?
title_fullStr Evaluating the Reporting Quality of Researcher-Developed Alphabet Knowledge Measures: How Transparent and Replicable Is It?
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Reporting Quality of Researcher-Developed Alphabet Knowledge Measures: How Transparent and Replicable Is It?
title_short Evaluating the Reporting Quality of Researcher-Developed Alphabet Knowledge Measures: How Transparent and Replicable Is It?
title_sort evaluating the reporting quality of researcher-developed alphabet knowledge measures: how transparent and replicable is it?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33935857
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601849
work_keys_str_mv AT hornersherril evaluatingthereportingqualityofresearcherdevelopedalphabetknowledgemeasureshowtransparentandreplicableisit
AT shaffersharona evaluatingthereportingqualityofresearcherdevelopedalphabetknowledgemeasureshowtransparentandreplicableisit