Cargando…

Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Double Blind, Prospective Study at the University of Chicago: Additional Standardizations of Trial Protocol are Needed to Evaluate the Effect of a CXCR1/2 Inhibitor in Islet Allotransplantation

A recent randomized, multicenter trial did not show benefit of a CXCR1/2 receptor inhibitor (Reparixin) when analysis included marginal islet mass (>3,000 IEQ/kg) for allotransplantation and when immunosuppression regimens were not standardized among participating centers. We present a post-hoc a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bachul, Piotr J., Golab, Karolina, Basto, Lindsay, Zangan, Steven, Pyda, Jordan S., Perez-Gutierrez, Angelica, Borek, Peter, Wang, Ling-Jia, Tibudan, Martin, Tran, Dong-Kha, Anteby, Roi, Generette, Gabriela S., Chrzanowski, Jędrzej, Fendler, Wojciech, Perea, Laurencia, Jayant, Kumar, Lucander, Aaron, Thomas, Celeste, Philipson, Louis, Millis, J. Michael, Fung, John, Witkowski, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33908301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09636897211001774
_version_ 1783686326637297664
author Bachul, Piotr J.
Golab, Karolina
Basto, Lindsay
Zangan, Steven
Pyda, Jordan S.
Perez-Gutierrez, Angelica
Borek, Peter
Wang, Ling-Jia
Tibudan, Martin
Tran, Dong-Kha
Anteby, Roi
Generette, Gabriela S.
Chrzanowski, Jędrzej
Fendler, Wojciech
Perea, Laurencia
Jayant, Kumar
Lucander, Aaron
Thomas, Celeste
Philipson, Louis
Millis, J. Michael
Fung, John
Witkowski, Piotr
author_facet Bachul, Piotr J.
Golab, Karolina
Basto, Lindsay
Zangan, Steven
Pyda, Jordan S.
Perez-Gutierrez, Angelica
Borek, Peter
Wang, Ling-Jia
Tibudan, Martin
Tran, Dong-Kha
Anteby, Roi
Generette, Gabriela S.
Chrzanowski, Jędrzej
Fendler, Wojciech
Perea, Laurencia
Jayant, Kumar
Lucander, Aaron
Thomas, Celeste
Philipson, Louis
Millis, J. Michael
Fung, John
Witkowski, Piotr
author_sort Bachul, Piotr J.
collection PubMed
description A recent randomized, multicenter trial did not show benefit of a CXCR1/2 receptor inhibitor (Reparixin) when analysis included marginal islet mass (>3,000 IEQ/kg) for allotransplantation and when immunosuppression regimens were not standardized among participating centers. We present a post-hoc analysis of trial patients from our center at the University of Chicago who received an islet mass of over 5,000 IEQ/kg and a standardized immunosuppression regimen of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) for induction. Twelve islet allotransplantation (ITx) recipients were randomized (2:1) to receive Reparixin (N = 8) or placebo (N = 4) in accordance with the multicenter trial protocol. Pancreas and donor characteristics did not differ between Reparixin and placebo groups. Five (62.5%) patients who received Reparixin, compared to none in the placebo group, achieved insulin independence after only one islet infusion and remained insulin-free for over 2 years (P = 0.08). Following the first ITx with ATG induction, distinct cytokine, chemokine, and miR-375 release profiles were observed for both the Reparixin and placebo groups. After excluding procedures with complications, islet engraftment on post-operative day 75 after a single transplant was higher in the Reparixin group (n = 7) than in the placebo (n = 3) group (P = 0.03) when islet graft function was measured by the ratio of the area under the curve (AUC) for c-peptide to glucose in mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT). Additionally, the rate of engraftment was higher when determined via BETA-2 score instead of MMTT (P = 0.01). Our analysis suggests that Reparixin may have improved outcomes compared to placebo when sufficient islet mass is transplanted and when standardized immunosuppression with ATG is used for induction. However, further studies are warranted. Investigation of Reparixin and other novel agents under more standardized and optimized conditions would help exclude confounding factors and allow for a more definitive evaluation of their role in improving outcomes in islet transplantation. Clinical trial reg. no. NCT01817959, clinicaltrials.gov
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8085379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80853792021-05-13 Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Double Blind, Prospective Study at the University of Chicago: Additional Standardizations of Trial Protocol are Needed to Evaluate the Effect of a CXCR1/2 Inhibitor in Islet Allotransplantation Bachul, Piotr J. Golab, Karolina Basto, Lindsay Zangan, Steven Pyda, Jordan S. Perez-Gutierrez, Angelica Borek, Peter Wang, Ling-Jia Tibudan, Martin Tran, Dong-Kha Anteby, Roi Generette, Gabriela S. Chrzanowski, Jędrzej Fendler, Wojciech Perea, Laurencia Jayant, Kumar Lucander, Aaron Thomas, Celeste Philipson, Louis Millis, J. Michael Fung, John Witkowski, Piotr Cell Transplant Original Article A recent randomized, multicenter trial did not show benefit of a CXCR1/2 receptor inhibitor (Reparixin) when analysis included marginal islet mass (>3,000 IEQ/kg) for allotransplantation and when immunosuppression regimens were not standardized among participating centers. We present a post-hoc analysis of trial patients from our center at the University of Chicago who received an islet mass of over 5,000 IEQ/kg and a standardized immunosuppression regimen of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) for induction. Twelve islet allotransplantation (ITx) recipients were randomized (2:1) to receive Reparixin (N = 8) or placebo (N = 4) in accordance with the multicenter trial protocol. Pancreas and donor characteristics did not differ between Reparixin and placebo groups. Five (62.5%) patients who received Reparixin, compared to none in the placebo group, achieved insulin independence after only one islet infusion and remained insulin-free for over 2 years (P = 0.08). Following the first ITx with ATG induction, distinct cytokine, chemokine, and miR-375 release profiles were observed for both the Reparixin and placebo groups. After excluding procedures with complications, islet engraftment on post-operative day 75 after a single transplant was higher in the Reparixin group (n = 7) than in the placebo (n = 3) group (P = 0.03) when islet graft function was measured by the ratio of the area under the curve (AUC) for c-peptide to glucose in mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT). Additionally, the rate of engraftment was higher when determined via BETA-2 score instead of MMTT (P = 0.01). Our analysis suggests that Reparixin may have improved outcomes compared to placebo when sufficient islet mass is transplanted and when standardized immunosuppression with ATG is used for induction. However, further studies are warranted. Investigation of Reparixin and other novel agents under more standardized and optimized conditions would help exclude confounding factors and allow for a more definitive evaluation of their role in improving outcomes in islet transplantation. Clinical trial reg. no. NCT01817959, clinicaltrials.gov SAGE Publications 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8085379/ /pubmed/33908301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09636897211001774 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Bachul, Piotr J.
Golab, Karolina
Basto, Lindsay
Zangan, Steven
Pyda, Jordan S.
Perez-Gutierrez, Angelica
Borek, Peter
Wang, Ling-Jia
Tibudan, Martin
Tran, Dong-Kha
Anteby, Roi
Generette, Gabriela S.
Chrzanowski, Jędrzej
Fendler, Wojciech
Perea, Laurencia
Jayant, Kumar
Lucander, Aaron
Thomas, Celeste
Philipson, Louis
Millis, J. Michael
Fung, John
Witkowski, Piotr
Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Double Blind, Prospective Study at the University of Chicago: Additional Standardizations of Trial Protocol are Needed to Evaluate the Effect of a CXCR1/2 Inhibitor in Islet Allotransplantation
title Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Double Blind, Prospective Study at the University of Chicago: Additional Standardizations of Trial Protocol are Needed to Evaluate the Effect of a CXCR1/2 Inhibitor in Islet Allotransplantation
title_full Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Double Blind, Prospective Study at the University of Chicago: Additional Standardizations of Trial Protocol are Needed to Evaluate the Effect of a CXCR1/2 Inhibitor in Islet Allotransplantation
title_fullStr Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Double Blind, Prospective Study at the University of Chicago: Additional Standardizations of Trial Protocol are Needed to Evaluate the Effect of a CXCR1/2 Inhibitor in Islet Allotransplantation
title_full_unstemmed Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Double Blind, Prospective Study at the University of Chicago: Additional Standardizations of Trial Protocol are Needed to Evaluate the Effect of a CXCR1/2 Inhibitor in Islet Allotransplantation
title_short Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Double Blind, Prospective Study at the University of Chicago: Additional Standardizations of Trial Protocol are Needed to Evaluate the Effect of a CXCR1/2 Inhibitor in Islet Allotransplantation
title_sort post-hoc analysis of a randomized, double blind, prospective study at the university of chicago: additional standardizations of trial protocol are needed to evaluate the effect of a cxcr1/2 inhibitor in islet allotransplantation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33908301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09636897211001774
work_keys_str_mv AT bachulpiotrj posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT golabkarolina posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT bastolindsay posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT zangansteven posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT pydajordans posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT perezgutierrezangelica posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT borekpeter posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT wanglingjia posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT tibudanmartin posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT trandongkha posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT antebyroi posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT generettegabrielas posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT chrzanowskijedrzej posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT fendlerwojciech posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT perealaurencia posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT jayantkumar posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT lucanderaaron posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT thomasceleste posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT philipsonlouis posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT millisjmichael posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT fungjohn posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation
AT witkowskipiotr posthocanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudyattheuniversityofchicagoadditionalstandardizationsoftrialprotocolareneededtoevaluatetheeffectofacxcr12inhibitorinisletallotransplantation