Cargando…

Prognostic Nomogram for Postoperative Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer of No Distant Metastasis

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) was one of the most common malignant tumors. However, the value of clinicopathological features in predicting the prognosis of postoperative patients with GEJ cancer and without distant metastasis was still unclear. METHODS: The 3425 GEJ patients diagnosed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Qiang, Peng, YuanYuan, Yang, Heng, Guo, JiaLong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.643261
_version_ 1783686338095087616
author Guo, Qiang
Peng, YuanYuan
Yang, Heng
Guo, JiaLong
author_facet Guo, Qiang
Peng, YuanYuan
Yang, Heng
Guo, JiaLong
author_sort Guo, Qiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) was one of the most common malignant tumors. However, the value of clinicopathological features in predicting the prognosis of postoperative patients with GEJ cancer and without distant metastasis was still unclear. METHODS: The 3425 GEJ patients diagnosed and underwent surgical resection without distant metastasis in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015 were enrolled,and they were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts with 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to determine the predictive factors that constituted the nomogram. The predictive accuracy and discriminability of Nomogram were determined by the area under the curve (AUC), C index, and calibration curve, and the influence of various factors on prognosis was explored. RESULTS: 2,400 patients were designed as training cohort and 1025 patients were designed as validation cohort. The percentages of the distribution of demographic and clinicopathological characteristics in the training and validation cohorts tended to be the same. In the training cohort, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the age, tumor grade, T stage and N stage were independent prognostic risk factors for patients with GEJ cancer without distant metastasis. The C index of nomogram model was 0.667. The AUC of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 0.704 and 0.71, respectively. The calibration curve of 3- and 5-year OS after operation showed that there was the best consistency between nomogram prediction and actual observation. In the validation cohort, the C index of nomogram model, the AUC of 3- and 5-year OS, and the calibration curve were similar to the training cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Nomogram could evaluate the prognosis of patients with GEJ cancer who underwent surgical resection without distant metastasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8085428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80854282021-05-01 Prognostic Nomogram for Postoperative Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer of No Distant Metastasis Guo, Qiang Peng, YuanYuan Yang, Heng Guo, JiaLong Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) was one of the most common malignant tumors. However, the value of clinicopathological features in predicting the prognosis of postoperative patients with GEJ cancer and without distant metastasis was still unclear. METHODS: The 3425 GEJ patients diagnosed and underwent surgical resection without distant metastasis in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015 were enrolled,and they were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts with 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to determine the predictive factors that constituted the nomogram. The predictive accuracy and discriminability of Nomogram were determined by the area under the curve (AUC), C index, and calibration curve, and the influence of various factors on prognosis was explored. RESULTS: 2,400 patients were designed as training cohort and 1025 patients were designed as validation cohort. The percentages of the distribution of demographic and clinicopathological characteristics in the training and validation cohorts tended to be the same. In the training cohort, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the age, tumor grade, T stage and N stage were independent prognostic risk factors for patients with GEJ cancer without distant metastasis. The C index of nomogram model was 0.667. The AUC of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 0.704 and 0.71, respectively. The calibration curve of 3- and 5-year OS after operation showed that there was the best consistency between nomogram prediction and actual observation. In the validation cohort, the C index of nomogram model, the AUC of 3- and 5-year OS, and the calibration curve were similar to the training cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Nomogram could evaluate the prognosis of patients with GEJ cancer who underwent surgical resection without distant metastasis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8085428/ /pubmed/33937047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.643261 Text en Copyright © 2021 Guo, Peng, Yang and Guo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Guo, Qiang
Peng, YuanYuan
Yang, Heng
Guo, JiaLong
Prognostic Nomogram for Postoperative Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer of No Distant Metastasis
title Prognostic Nomogram for Postoperative Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer of No Distant Metastasis
title_full Prognostic Nomogram for Postoperative Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer of No Distant Metastasis
title_fullStr Prognostic Nomogram for Postoperative Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer of No Distant Metastasis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Nomogram for Postoperative Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer of No Distant Metastasis
title_short Prognostic Nomogram for Postoperative Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer of No Distant Metastasis
title_sort prognostic nomogram for postoperative patients with gastroesophageal junction cancer of no distant metastasis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.643261
work_keys_str_mv AT guoqiang prognosticnomogramforpostoperativepatientswithgastroesophagealjunctioncancerofnodistantmetastasis
AT pengyuanyuan prognosticnomogramforpostoperativepatientswithgastroesophagealjunctioncancerofnodistantmetastasis
AT yangheng prognosticnomogramforpostoperativepatientswithgastroesophagealjunctioncancerofnodistantmetastasis
AT guojialong prognosticnomogramforpostoperativepatientswithgastroesophagealjunctioncancerofnodistantmetastasis