Cargando…
Individual Differences in Intertemporal Choice
Intertemporal choice involves deciding between smaller, sooner and larger, later rewards. People tend to prefer smaller rewards that are available earlier to larger rewards available later, a phenomenon referred to as temporal or delay discounting. Despite its ubiquity in human and non-human animals...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33935897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643670 |
_version_ | 1783686374593921024 |
---|---|
author | Keidel, Kristof Rramani, Qëndresa Weber, Bernd Murawski, Carsten Ettinger, Ulrich |
author_facet | Keidel, Kristof Rramani, Qëndresa Weber, Bernd Murawski, Carsten Ettinger, Ulrich |
author_sort | Keidel, Kristof |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intertemporal choice involves deciding between smaller, sooner and larger, later rewards. People tend to prefer smaller rewards that are available earlier to larger rewards available later, a phenomenon referred to as temporal or delay discounting. Despite its ubiquity in human and non-human animals, temporal discounting is subject to considerable individual differences. Here, we provide a critical narrative review of this literature and make suggestions for future work. We conclude that temporal discounting is associated with key socio-economic and health-related variables. Regarding personality, large-scale studies have found steeper temporal discounting to be associated with higher levels of self-reported impulsivity and extraversion; however, effect sizes are small. Temporal discounting correlates negatively with future-oriented cognitive styles and inhibitory control, again with small effect sizes. There are consistent associations between steeper temporal discounting and lower intelligence, with effect sizes exceeding those of personality or cognitive variables, although socio-demographic moderator variables may play a role. Neuroimaging evidence of brain structural and functional correlates is not yet consistent, neither with regard to areas nor directions of effects. Finally, following early candidate gene studies, recent Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) approaches have revealed the molecular genetic architecture of temporal discounting to be more complex than initially thought. Overall, the study of individual differences in temporal discounting is a maturing field that has produced some replicable findings. Effect sizes are small-to-medium, necessitating future hypothesis-driven work that prioritizes large samples with adequate power calculations. More research is also needed regarding the neural origins of individual differences in temporal discounting as well as the mediating neural mechanisms of associations of temporal discounting with personality and cognitive variables. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8085593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80855932021-05-01 Individual Differences in Intertemporal Choice Keidel, Kristof Rramani, Qëndresa Weber, Bernd Murawski, Carsten Ettinger, Ulrich Front Psychol Psychology Intertemporal choice involves deciding between smaller, sooner and larger, later rewards. People tend to prefer smaller rewards that are available earlier to larger rewards available later, a phenomenon referred to as temporal or delay discounting. Despite its ubiquity in human and non-human animals, temporal discounting is subject to considerable individual differences. Here, we provide a critical narrative review of this literature and make suggestions for future work. We conclude that temporal discounting is associated with key socio-economic and health-related variables. Regarding personality, large-scale studies have found steeper temporal discounting to be associated with higher levels of self-reported impulsivity and extraversion; however, effect sizes are small. Temporal discounting correlates negatively with future-oriented cognitive styles and inhibitory control, again with small effect sizes. There are consistent associations between steeper temporal discounting and lower intelligence, with effect sizes exceeding those of personality or cognitive variables, although socio-demographic moderator variables may play a role. Neuroimaging evidence of brain structural and functional correlates is not yet consistent, neither with regard to areas nor directions of effects. Finally, following early candidate gene studies, recent Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) approaches have revealed the molecular genetic architecture of temporal discounting to be more complex than initially thought. Overall, the study of individual differences in temporal discounting is a maturing field that has produced some replicable findings. Effect sizes are small-to-medium, necessitating future hypothesis-driven work that prioritizes large samples with adequate power calculations. More research is also needed regarding the neural origins of individual differences in temporal discounting as well as the mediating neural mechanisms of associations of temporal discounting with personality and cognitive variables. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8085593/ /pubmed/33935897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643670 Text en Copyright © 2021 Keidel, Rramani, Weber, Murawski and Ettinger. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Keidel, Kristof Rramani, Qëndresa Weber, Bernd Murawski, Carsten Ettinger, Ulrich Individual Differences in Intertemporal Choice |
title | Individual Differences in Intertemporal Choice |
title_full | Individual Differences in Intertemporal Choice |
title_fullStr | Individual Differences in Intertemporal Choice |
title_full_unstemmed | Individual Differences in Intertemporal Choice |
title_short | Individual Differences in Intertemporal Choice |
title_sort | individual differences in intertemporal choice |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33935897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643670 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keidelkristof individualdifferencesinintertemporalchoice AT rramaniqendresa individualdifferencesinintertemporalchoice AT weberbernd individualdifferencesinintertemporalchoice AT murawskicarsten individualdifferencesinintertemporalchoice AT ettingerulrich individualdifferencesinintertemporalchoice |