Cargando…

Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics for the nose?

Several studies have recently pointed towards an increased occurrence and prevalence of several taxa of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in the microbiota of the upper respiratory tract (URT) under healthy conditions versus disease. These include several species of the Lactobacillales such as Lacticas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Boeck, Ilke, Spacova, Irina, Vanderveken, Olivier M., Lebeer, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33507624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13759
_version_ 1783686429283450880
author De Boeck, Ilke
Spacova, Irina
Vanderveken, Olivier M.
Lebeer, Sarah
author_facet De Boeck, Ilke
Spacova, Irina
Vanderveken, Olivier M.
Lebeer, Sarah
author_sort De Boeck, Ilke
collection PubMed
description Several studies have recently pointed towards an increased occurrence and prevalence of several taxa of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in the microbiota of the upper respiratory tract (URT) under healthy conditions versus disease. These include several species of the Lactobacillales such as Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactococcus lactis and Dolosigranulum pigrum. In addition to physiological studies on their potential beneficial functions and their long history of safe use as probiotics in other human body sites, LAB are thus increasingly to be explored as alternative or complementary treatment for URT diseases. This review highlights the importance of lactic acid bacteria in the respiratory tract and their potential as topical probiotics for this body site. We focus on the potential probiotic properties and adaptation factors that are needed for a bacterial strain to optimally exert its beneficial activity in the respiratory tract. Furthermore, we discuss a range of in silico, in vitro and in vivo models needed to obtain better insights into the efficacy and adaptation factors specifically for URT probiotics. Such knowledge will facilitate optimal strain selection in order to conduct rigorous clinical studies with the most suitable probiotic strains. Despite convincing evidence from microbiome association and in vitro studies, the clinical evidence for oral or topical probiotics for common URT diseases such as chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) needs further substantiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8085937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80859372021-05-07 Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics for the nose? De Boeck, Ilke Spacova, Irina Vanderveken, Olivier M. Lebeer, Sarah Microb Biotechnol Minireviews Several studies have recently pointed towards an increased occurrence and prevalence of several taxa of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in the microbiota of the upper respiratory tract (URT) under healthy conditions versus disease. These include several species of the Lactobacillales such as Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactococcus lactis and Dolosigranulum pigrum. In addition to physiological studies on their potential beneficial functions and their long history of safe use as probiotics in other human body sites, LAB are thus increasingly to be explored as alternative or complementary treatment for URT diseases. This review highlights the importance of lactic acid bacteria in the respiratory tract and their potential as topical probiotics for this body site. We focus on the potential probiotic properties and adaptation factors that are needed for a bacterial strain to optimally exert its beneficial activity in the respiratory tract. Furthermore, we discuss a range of in silico, in vitro and in vivo models needed to obtain better insights into the efficacy and adaptation factors specifically for URT probiotics. Such knowledge will facilitate optimal strain selection in order to conduct rigorous clinical studies with the most suitable probiotic strains. Despite convincing evidence from microbiome association and in vitro studies, the clinical evidence for oral or topical probiotics for common URT diseases such as chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) needs further substantiation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8085937/ /pubmed/33507624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13759 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Minireviews
De Boeck, Ilke
Spacova, Irina
Vanderveken, Olivier M.
Lebeer, Sarah
Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics for the nose?
title Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics for the nose?
title_full Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics for the nose?
title_fullStr Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics for the nose?
title_full_unstemmed Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics for the nose?
title_short Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics for the nose?
title_sort lactic acid bacteria as probiotics for the nose?
topic Minireviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33507624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13759
work_keys_str_mv AT deboeckilke lacticacidbacteriaasprobioticsforthenose
AT spacovairina lacticacidbacteriaasprobioticsforthenose
AT vandervekenolivierm lacticacidbacteriaasprobioticsforthenose
AT lebeersarah lacticacidbacteriaasprobioticsforthenose