Cargando…

Emergency surgery for splenic flexure cancer: results of the SFC Study Group database

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of surgical treatment for splenic flexure carcinomas (SFCs) in emergency settings remains unexplored. This study aims to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of different alternatives for emergency SFC resection. METHOD: This multicenter retrospective study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de’Angelis, Nicola, Espin, Eloy, Ris, Frederic, Landi, Filippo, Le Roy, Bertrand, Coccolini, Federico, Celentano, Valerio, Gurrado, Angela, Pezet, Denis, Bianchi, Giorgio, Memeo, Riccardo, Vitali, Giulio C., Solis, Alejandro, Denet, Christine, Di Saverio, Salomone, de’Angelis, Gian Luigi, Kraft, Miquel, Gonzálvez-Guardiola, Paula, Stakelum, Aine, Catena, Fausto, Fuks, David, Winter, Des C., Testini, Mario, Martínez-Pérez, Aleix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33926504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00365-0
_version_ 1783686464447447040
author de’Angelis, Nicola
Espin, Eloy
Ris, Frederic
Landi, Filippo
Le Roy, Bertrand
Coccolini, Federico
Celentano, Valerio
Gurrado, Angela
Pezet, Denis
Bianchi, Giorgio
Memeo, Riccardo
Vitali, Giulio C.
Solis, Alejandro
Denet, Christine
Di Saverio, Salomone
de’Angelis, Gian Luigi
Kraft, Miquel
Gonzálvez-Guardiola, Paula
Stakelum, Aine
Catena, Fausto
Fuks, David
Winter, Des C.
Testini, Mario
Martínez-Pérez, Aleix
author_facet de’Angelis, Nicola
Espin, Eloy
Ris, Frederic
Landi, Filippo
Le Roy, Bertrand
Coccolini, Federico
Celentano, Valerio
Gurrado, Angela
Pezet, Denis
Bianchi, Giorgio
Memeo, Riccardo
Vitali, Giulio C.
Solis, Alejandro
Denet, Christine
Di Saverio, Salomone
de’Angelis, Gian Luigi
Kraft, Miquel
Gonzálvez-Guardiola, Paula
Stakelum, Aine
Catena, Fausto
Fuks, David
Winter, Des C.
Testini, Mario
Martínez-Pérez, Aleix
author_sort de’Angelis, Nicola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of surgical treatment for splenic flexure carcinomas (SFCs) in emergency settings remains unexplored. This study aims to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of different alternatives for emergency SFC resection. METHOD: This multicenter retrospective study was based on the SFC Study Group database. For the present analysis, SFC patients were selected if they had received emergency surgical resection with curative intent between 2000 and 2018. Extended right colectomy (ERC), left colectomy (LC), and segmental left colectomy (SLC) were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 90 SFC patients who underwent emergency ERC (n = 55, 61.1%), LC (n = 18, 20%), or SLC (n = 17, 18.9%). Bowel obstruction was the most frequent indication for surgery (n = 75, 83.3%), and an open approach was chosen in 81.1% of the patients. A higher incidence of postoperative complications was observed in the ERC group (70.9%) than in the LC (44.4%) and SLC groups (47.1%), with a significant procedure-related difference for severe postoperative complications (Dindo-Clavien ≥ III; adjusted odds ratio for ERC vs. LC:7.23; 95% CI 1.51-34.66; p = 0.013). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 8 (11.2%) patients, with no differences between the groups (p = 0.902). R0 resection was achieved in 98.9% of the procedures, and ≥ 12 lymph nodes were retrieved in 92.2% of patients. Overall and disease-free survival rates at 5 years were similar between the groups and were significantly associated with stage pT4 and the presence of synchronous metastases. CONCLUSION: In the emergency setting, ERC and open surgery are the most frequently performed procedures. ERC is associated with increased odds of severe postoperative complications when compared to more conservative SFC resections. Nonetheless, all the alternatives seem to provide similar pathologic and long-term outcomes, supporting the oncological safety of more conservative resections for emergency SFCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8086132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80861322021-04-30 Emergency surgery for splenic flexure cancer: results of the SFC Study Group database de’Angelis, Nicola Espin, Eloy Ris, Frederic Landi, Filippo Le Roy, Bertrand Coccolini, Federico Celentano, Valerio Gurrado, Angela Pezet, Denis Bianchi, Giorgio Memeo, Riccardo Vitali, Giulio C. Solis, Alejandro Denet, Christine Di Saverio, Salomone de’Angelis, Gian Luigi Kraft, Miquel Gonzálvez-Guardiola, Paula Stakelum, Aine Catena, Fausto Fuks, David Winter, Des C. Testini, Mario Martínez-Pérez, Aleix World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of surgical treatment for splenic flexure carcinomas (SFCs) in emergency settings remains unexplored. This study aims to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of different alternatives for emergency SFC resection. METHOD: This multicenter retrospective study was based on the SFC Study Group database. For the present analysis, SFC patients were selected if they had received emergency surgical resection with curative intent between 2000 and 2018. Extended right colectomy (ERC), left colectomy (LC), and segmental left colectomy (SLC) were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 90 SFC patients who underwent emergency ERC (n = 55, 61.1%), LC (n = 18, 20%), or SLC (n = 17, 18.9%). Bowel obstruction was the most frequent indication for surgery (n = 75, 83.3%), and an open approach was chosen in 81.1% of the patients. A higher incidence of postoperative complications was observed in the ERC group (70.9%) than in the LC (44.4%) and SLC groups (47.1%), with a significant procedure-related difference for severe postoperative complications (Dindo-Clavien ≥ III; adjusted odds ratio for ERC vs. LC:7.23; 95% CI 1.51-34.66; p = 0.013). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 8 (11.2%) patients, with no differences between the groups (p = 0.902). R0 resection was achieved in 98.9% of the procedures, and ≥ 12 lymph nodes were retrieved in 92.2% of patients. Overall and disease-free survival rates at 5 years were similar between the groups and were significantly associated with stage pT4 and the presence of synchronous metastases. CONCLUSION: In the emergency setting, ERC and open surgery are the most frequently performed procedures. ERC is associated with increased odds of severe postoperative complications when compared to more conservative SFC resections. Nonetheless, all the alternatives seem to provide similar pathologic and long-term outcomes, supporting the oncological safety of more conservative resections for emergency SFCs. BioMed Central 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8086132/ /pubmed/33926504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00365-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
de’Angelis, Nicola
Espin, Eloy
Ris, Frederic
Landi, Filippo
Le Roy, Bertrand
Coccolini, Federico
Celentano, Valerio
Gurrado, Angela
Pezet, Denis
Bianchi, Giorgio
Memeo, Riccardo
Vitali, Giulio C.
Solis, Alejandro
Denet, Christine
Di Saverio, Salomone
de’Angelis, Gian Luigi
Kraft, Miquel
Gonzálvez-Guardiola, Paula
Stakelum, Aine
Catena, Fausto
Fuks, David
Winter, Des C.
Testini, Mario
Martínez-Pérez, Aleix
Emergency surgery for splenic flexure cancer: results of the SFC Study Group database
title Emergency surgery for splenic flexure cancer: results of the SFC Study Group database
title_full Emergency surgery for splenic flexure cancer: results of the SFC Study Group database
title_fullStr Emergency surgery for splenic flexure cancer: results of the SFC Study Group database
title_full_unstemmed Emergency surgery for splenic flexure cancer: results of the SFC Study Group database
title_short Emergency surgery for splenic flexure cancer: results of the SFC Study Group database
title_sort emergency surgery for splenic flexure cancer: results of the sfc study group database
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33926504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00365-0
work_keys_str_mv AT deangelisnicola emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT espineloy emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT risfrederic emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT landifilippo emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT leroybertrand emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT coccolinifederico emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT celentanovalerio emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT gurradoangela emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT pezetdenis emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT bianchigiorgio emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT memeoriccardo emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT vitaligiulioc emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT solisalejandro emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT denetchristine emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT disaveriosalomone emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT deangelisgianluigi emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT kraftmiquel emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT gonzalvezguardiolapaula emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT stakelumaine emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT catenafausto emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT fuksdavid emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT winterdesc emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT testinimario emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT martinezperezaleix emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase
AT emergencysurgeryforsplenicflexurecancerresultsofthesfcstudygroupdatabase