Cargando…

The Loudness of Suctioning in the Ear Canal

Aim To determine the loudness of suctioning in the ear canal with different-sized suctions and various mediums. Aural microsuctioning is commonly used in the otolaryngologist’s office setting for cerumen removal and aural toilet. We hypothesize that the intensity of the sound would increase with inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byrd, Colin, Keidar, Eytan, Santiago, Olga, Shermetaro, Carl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33936910
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14208
_version_ 1783686474148872192
author Byrd, Colin
Keidar, Eytan
Santiago, Olga
Shermetaro, Carl
author_facet Byrd, Colin
Keidar, Eytan
Santiago, Olga
Shermetaro, Carl
author_sort Byrd, Colin
collection PubMed
description Aim To determine the loudness of suctioning in the ear canal with different-sized suctions and various mediums. Aural microsuctioning is commonly used in the otolaryngologist’s office setting for cerumen removal and aural toilet. We hypothesize that the intensity of the sound would increase with increasing viscosity of the medium and increasing suction diameter. Methods The intensity of the sound generated was measured while suctioning air, water, and yogurt on cadaveric temporal bones with size 7 and 5 Frazier suctions. This was performed with one measurer and one operator. Under otomicroscopy, the operator would suction the ear canal and the measurer would record the intensity of the sound with a sound decibel meter placed at the lateral and posterior external auditory canal. Data was collected with two separate operators and measurers to aid with inter-rater reliability. Results There was a total of 240 repeated observations (10 cadavers, 3 mediums, 2 suction devices; 2 investigators). The range of the maximum peak intensity ranged from 63.0 dB to 100.0 dB. The lowest peak intensity of decibels was recorded in air with the size 5 Frazier suction; and the highest measured was with the size 5 Frazier suction in yogurt. Statistically significant differences were found only in the measurements in air. Conclusion Our investigation found that increasing peak sound intensities were generated by increasing the viscosity of the fluid medium that was being suctioned. However, the smaller sized diameter suction actually generated louder sound intensities than the larger diameter suction with higher viscosity fluid media, but this was not statistically significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8086199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80861992021-04-30 The Loudness of Suctioning in the Ear Canal Byrd, Colin Keidar, Eytan Santiago, Olga Shermetaro, Carl Cureus Otolaryngology Aim To determine the loudness of suctioning in the ear canal with different-sized suctions and various mediums. Aural microsuctioning is commonly used in the otolaryngologist’s office setting for cerumen removal and aural toilet. We hypothesize that the intensity of the sound would increase with increasing viscosity of the medium and increasing suction diameter. Methods The intensity of the sound generated was measured while suctioning air, water, and yogurt on cadaveric temporal bones with size 7 and 5 Frazier suctions. This was performed with one measurer and one operator. Under otomicroscopy, the operator would suction the ear canal and the measurer would record the intensity of the sound with a sound decibel meter placed at the lateral and posterior external auditory canal. Data was collected with two separate operators and measurers to aid with inter-rater reliability. Results There was a total of 240 repeated observations (10 cadavers, 3 mediums, 2 suction devices; 2 investigators). The range of the maximum peak intensity ranged from 63.0 dB to 100.0 dB. The lowest peak intensity of decibels was recorded in air with the size 5 Frazier suction; and the highest measured was with the size 5 Frazier suction in yogurt. Statistically significant differences were found only in the measurements in air. Conclusion Our investigation found that increasing peak sound intensities were generated by increasing the viscosity of the fluid medium that was being suctioned. However, the smaller sized diameter suction actually generated louder sound intensities than the larger diameter suction with higher viscosity fluid media, but this was not statistically significant. Cureus 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8086199/ /pubmed/33936910 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14208 Text en Copyright © 2021, Byrd et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Otolaryngology
Byrd, Colin
Keidar, Eytan
Santiago, Olga
Shermetaro, Carl
The Loudness of Suctioning in the Ear Canal
title The Loudness of Suctioning in the Ear Canal
title_full The Loudness of Suctioning in the Ear Canal
title_fullStr The Loudness of Suctioning in the Ear Canal
title_full_unstemmed The Loudness of Suctioning in the Ear Canal
title_short The Loudness of Suctioning in the Ear Canal
title_sort loudness of suctioning in the ear canal
topic Otolaryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33936910
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14208
work_keys_str_mv AT byrdcolin theloudnessofsuctioningintheearcanal
AT keidareytan theloudnessofsuctioningintheearcanal
AT santiagoolga theloudnessofsuctioningintheearcanal
AT shermetarocarl theloudnessofsuctioningintheearcanal
AT byrdcolin loudnessofsuctioningintheearcanal
AT keidareytan loudnessofsuctioningintheearcanal
AT santiagoolga loudnessofsuctioningintheearcanal
AT shermetarocarl loudnessofsuctioningintheearcanal