Cargando…
Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES)
INTRODUCTION: Pressure on capacity in ophthalmology alongside the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic led to the development of the COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES), allowing patients to receive a prompt ophthalmic consultation, including remotely. The aim of this study was to conduct a service ev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01522-0 |
_version_ | 1783686480763289600 |
---|---|
author | Kanabar, Rahul Craven, Wendy Wilson, Helen Rietdyke, Rebecca Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe Jinkinson, Matthew Newman, William D. Harper, Robert A. |
author_facet | Kanabar, Rahul Craven, Wendy Wilson, Helen Rietdyke, Rebecca Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe Jinkinson, Matthew Newman, William D. Harper, Robert A. |
author_sort | Kanabar, Rahul |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pressure on capacity in ophthalmology alongside the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic led to the development of the COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES), allowing patients to receive a prompt ophthalmic consultation, including remotely. The aim of this study was to conduct a service evaluation of CUES in Manchester. METHODS: Data were collected both prospectively and retrospectively from both primary and secondary care over an 8-week period from June to August 2020. RESULTS: In primary care CUES in Greater Manchester (GM) 2461 patients were assessed, with a majority self-referring to the service (68.7%, n = 1844). 91.7% of cases initially screened for CUES were deemed eligible and given a telemedicine appointment in GM; 53.3% of these cases required face-to-face consultation. 14.3% of cases seen within in GM CUES (351 out of 2461) were provisionally referred to secondary care. Contemporaneously the main provider emergency eyecare department (EED) attendances were reduced by 37.7% per month between April and December 2020 inclusive, compared to the same months in 2019. Patients attending a CUES face-to-face assessment were more likely to have a diagnosis in agreement with secondary care, compared to patients referred in from telemedicine assessment only (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This evaluation of CUES demonstrates a high level of primary care activity alongside a sustained reduction in EED cases. The case-mix of patients seen within EED following referral appears to be of a less benign nature than those cases seen prior to the introduction of CUES. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8086227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80862272021-05-03 Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES) Kanabar, Rahul Craven, Wendy Wilson, Helen Rietdyke, Rebecca Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe Jinkinson, Matthew Newman, William D. Harper, Robert A. Eye (Lond) Article INTRODUCTION: Pressure on capacity in ophthalmology alongside the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic led to the development of the COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES), allowing patients to receive a prompt ophthalmic consultation, including remotely. The aim of this study was to conduct a service evaluation of CUES in Manchester. METHODS: Data were collected both prospectively and retrospectively from both primary and secondary care over an 8-week period from June to August 2020. RESULTS: In primary care CUES in Greater Manchester (GM) 2461 patients were assessed, with a majority self-referring to the service (68.7%, n = 1844). 91.7% of cases initially screened for CUES were deemed eligible and given a telemedicine appointment in GM; 53.3% of these cases required face-to-face consultation. 14.3% of cases seen within in GM CUES (351 out of 2461) were provisionally referred to secondary care. Contemporaneously the main provider emergency eyecare department (EED) attendances were reduced by 37.7% per month between April and December 2020 inclusive, compared to the same months in 2019. Patients attending a CUES face-to-face assessment were more likely to have a diagnosis in agreement with secondary care, compared to patients referred in from telemedicine assessment only (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This evaluation of CUES demonstrates a high level of primary care activity alongside a sustained reduction in EED cases. The case-mix of patients seen within EED following referral appears to be of a less benign nature than those cases seen prior to the introduction of CUES. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-30 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8086227/ /pubmed/33931762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01522-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kanabar, Rahul Craven, Wendy Wilson, Helen Rietdyke, Rebecca Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe Jinkinson, Matthew Newman, William D. Harper, Robert A. Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES) |
title | Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES) |
title_full | Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES) |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES) |
title_short | Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES) |
title_sort | evaluation of the manchester covid-19 urgent eyecare service (cues) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01522-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanabarrahul evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues AT cravenwendy evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues AT wilsonhelen evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues AT rietdykerebecca evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues AT dhawahirscalafelipe evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues AT jinkinsonmatthew evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues AT newmanwilliamd evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues AT harperroberta evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues |