Cargando…

Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES)

INTRODUCTION: Pressure on capacity in ophthalmology alongside the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic led to the development of the COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES), allowing patients to receive a prompt ophthalmic consultation, including remotely. The aim of this study was to conduct a service ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanabar, Rahul, Craven, Wendy, Wilson, Helen, Rietdyke, Rebecca, Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe, Jinkinson, Matthew, Newman, William D., Harper, Robert A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01522-0
_version_ 1783686480763289600
author Kanabar, Rahul
Craven, Wendy
Wilson, Helen
Rietdyke, Rebecca
Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe
Jinkinson, Matthew
Newman, William D.
Harper, Robert A.
author_facet Kanabar, Rahul
Craven, Wendy
Wilson, Helen
Rietdyke, Rebecca
Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe
Jinkinson, Matthew
Newman, William D.
Harper, Robert A.
author_sort Kanabar, Rahul
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pressure on capacity in ophthalmology alongside the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic led to the development of the COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES), allowing patients to receive a prompt ophthalmic consultation, including remotely. The aim of this study was to conduct a service evaluation of CUES in Manchester. METHODS: Data were collected both prospectively and retrospectively from both primary and secondary care over an 8-week period from June to August 2020. RESULTS: In primary care CUES in Greater Manchester (GM) 2461 patients were assessed, with a majority self-referring to the service (68.7%, n = 1844). 91.7% of cases initially screened for CUES were deemed eligible and given a telemedicine appointment in GM; 53.3% of these cases required face-to-face consultation. 14.3% of cases seen within in GM CUES (351 out of 2461) were provisionally referred to secondary care. Contemporaneously the main provider emergency eyecare department (EED) attendances were reduced by 37.7% per month between April and December 2020 inclusive, compared to the same months in 2019. Patients attending a CUES face-to-face assessment were more likely to have a diagnosis in agreement with secondary care, compared to patients referred in from telemedicine assessment only (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This evaluation of CUES demonstrates a high level of primary care activity alongside a sustained reduction in EED cases. The case-mix of patients seen within EED following referral appears to be of a less benign nature than those cases seen prior to the introduction of CUES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8086227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80862272021-05-03 Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES) Kanabar, Rahul Craven, Wendy Wilson, Helen Rietdyke, Rebecca Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe Jinkinson, Matthew Newman, William D. Harper, Robert A. Eye (Lond) Article INTRODUCTION: Pressure on capacity in ophthalmology alongside the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic led to the development of the COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES), allowing patients to receive a prompt ophthalmic consultation, including remotely. The aim of this study was to conduct a service evaluation of CUES in Manchester. METHODS: Data were collected both prospectively and retrospectively from both primary and secondary care over an 8-week period from June to August 2020. RESULTS: In primary care CUES in Greater Manchester (GM) 2461 patients were assessed, with a majority self-referring to the service (68.7%, n = 1844). 91.7% of cases initially screened for CUES were deemed eligible and given a telemedicine appointment in GM; 53.3% of these cases required face-to-face consultation. 14.3% of cases seen within in GM CUES (351 out of 2461) were provisionally referred to secondary care. Contemporaneously the main provider emergency eyecare department (EED) attendances were reduced by 37.7% per month between April and December 2020 inclusive, compared to the same months in 2019. Patients attending a CUES face-to-face assessment were more likely to have a diagnosis in agreement with secondary care, compared to patients referred in from telemedicine assessment only (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This evaluation of CUES demonstrates a high level of primary care activity alongside a sustained reduction in EED cases. The case-mix of patients seen within EED following referral appears to be of a less benign nature than those cases seen prior to the introduction of CUES. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-30 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8086227/ /pubmed/33931762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01522-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kanabar, Rahul
Craven, Wendy
Wilson, Helen
Rietdyke, Rebecca
Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe
Jinkinson, Matthew
Newman, William D.
Harper, Robert A.
Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES)
title Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES)
title_full Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES)
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES)
title_short Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES)
title_sort evaluation of the manchester covid-19 urgent eyecare service (cues)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01522-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kanabarrahul evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues
AT cravenwendy evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues
AT wilsonhelen evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues
AT rietdykerebecca evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues
AT dhawahirscalafelipe evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues
AT jinkinsonmatthew evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues
AT newmanwilliamd evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues
AT harperroberta evaluationofthemanchestercovid19urgenteyecareservicecues