Cargando…
Comparison of GFAP and UCH-L1 Measurements from Two Prototype Assays: The Abbott i-STAT and ARCHITECT Assays
Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) may aid in the evaluation of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this analysis was to compare GFAP and UCH-L1 values measured using a handheld device compared with a core laboratory platform. We a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neur.2020.0037 |
_version_ | 1783686524032778240 |
---|---|
author | Korley, Frederick K. Datwyler, Saul A. Jain, Sonia Sun, Xiaoying Beligere, Gangamani Chandran, Raj Marino, Jaime A. McQuiston, Beth Zhang, Hongwei Caudle, Krista L. Wang, Kevin K.W. Puccio, Ava M. Okonkwo, David O. Yue, John K. Taylor, Sabrina R. Markowitz, Amy Manley, Geoffrey T. Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon |
author_facet | Korley, Frederick K. Datwyler, Saul A. Jain, Sonia Sun, Xiaoying Beligere, Gangamani Chandran, Raj Marino, Jaime A. McQuiston, Beth Zhang, Hongwei Caudle, Krista L. Wang, Kevin K.W. Puccio, Ava M. Okonkwo, David O. Yue, John K. Taylor, Sabrina R. Markowitz, Amy Manley, Geoffrey T. Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon |
author_sort | Korley, Frederick K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) may aid in the evaluation of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this analysis was to compare GFAP and UCH-L1 values measured using a handheld device compared with a core laboratory platform. We analyzed plasma samples from patients with TBI and healthy controls enrolled in the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) cohort study. GFAP and UCH-L1 were measured twice in each subject using prototype assays, first with the Abbott i-STAT™ handheld device, and second with the Abbott ARCHITECT(®) platform. We then quantified the agreement in biomarker values obtained using these two methods. GFAP and UCH-L1 were measured twice in 570 and 572 samples, respectively. GFAP values measured by the ARCHITECT platform (median 143.3 [interquartile range (IQR): 19.8–925.8] pg/mL) were higher than values measured by the i-STAT (median 116.0 [IQR: 9.2–856.5] pg/mL). GFAP values from the two platforms were strongly correlated (p = 0.985). Similarly, UCH-L1 values measured by the ARCHITECT platform (median 163.9 [IQR: 82.5–412.4] pg/mL) were higher than values measured by the i-STAT (median 122.5 [IQR: 63.0–297.3] pg/mL). UCH-L1 values from the two platforms were strongly correlated (p = 0.933). Passing-Bablok regression equations were developed to estimate the relationship between the two platforms, specifically to predict i-STAT values from the ARCHITECT platform. GFAP and UCH-L1 values measured using the prototype assays on the Abbott i-STAT and ARCHITECT platforms are strongly correlated and values from either platform may be converted to the other. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8086519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80865192021-04-30 Comparison of GFAP and UCH-L1 Measurements from Two Prototype Assays: The Abbott i-STAT and ARCHITECT Assays Korley, Frederick K. Datwyler, Saul A. Jain, Sonia Sun, Xiaoying Beligere, Gangamani Chandran, Raj Marino, Jaime A. McQuiston, Beth Zhang, Hongwei Caudle, Krista L. Wang, Kevin K.W. Puccio, Ava M. Okonkwo, David O. Yue, John K. Taylor, Sabrina R. Markowitz, Amy Manley, Geoffrey T. Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon Neurotrauma Rep Original Article Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) may aid in the evaluation of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this analysis was to compare GFAP and UCH-L1 values measured using a handheld device compared with a core laboratory platform. We analyzed plasma samples from patients with TBI and healthy controls enrolled in the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) cohort study. GFAP and UCH-L1 were measured twice in each subject using prototype assays, first with the Abbott i-STAT™ handheld device, and second with the Abbott ARCHITECT(®) platform. We then quantified the agreement in biomarker values obtained using these two methods. GFAP and UCH-L1 were measured twice in 570 and 572 samples, respectively. GFAP values measured by the ARCHITECT platform (median 143.3 [interquartile range (IQR): 19.8–925.8] pg/mL) were higher than values measured by the i-STAT (median 116.0 [IQR: 9.2–856.5] pg/mL). GFAP values from the two platforms were strongly correlated (p = 0.985). Similarly, UCH-L1 values measured by the ARCHITECT platform (median 163.9 [IQR: 82.5–412.4] pg/mL) were higher than values measured by the i-STAT (median 122.5 [IQR: 63.0–297.3] pg/mL). UCH-L1 values from the two platforms were strongly correlated (p = 0.933). Passing-Bablok regression equations were developed to estimate the relationship between the two platforms, specifically to predict i-STAT values from the ARCHITECT platform. GFAP and UCH-L1 values measured using the prototype assays on the Abbott i-STAT and ARCHITECT platforms are strongly correlated and values from either platform may be converted to the other. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8086519/ /pubmed/33937911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neur.2020.0037 Text en © Frederick K. Korley et al., 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Korley, Frederick K. Datwyler, Saul A. Jain, Sonia Sun, Xiaoying Beligere, Gangamani Chandran, Raj Marino, Jaime A. McQuiston, Beth Zhang, Hongwei Caudle, Krista L. Wang, Kevin K.W. Puccio, Ava M. Okonkwo, David O. Yue, John K. Taylor, Sabrina R. Markowitz, Amy Manley, Geoffrey T. Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon Comparison of GFAP and UCH-L1 Measurements from Two Prototype Assays: The Abbott i-STAT and ARCHITECT Assays |
title | Comparison of GFAP and UCH-L1 Measurements from Two Prototype Assays: The Abbott i-STAT and ARCHITECT Assays |
title_full | Comparison of GFAP and UCH-L1 Measurements from Two Prototype Assays: The Abbott i-STAT and ARCHITECT Assays |
title_fullStr | Comparison of GFAP and UCH-L1 Measurements from Two Prototype Assays: The Abbott i-STAT and ARCHITECT Assays |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of GFAP and UCH-L1 Measurements from Two Prototype Assays: The Abbott i-STAT and ARCHITECT Assays |
title_short | Comparison of GFAP and UCH-L1 Measurements from Two Prototype Assays: The Abbott i-STAT and ARCHITECT Assays |
title_sort | comparison of gfap and uch-l1 measurements from two prototype assays: the abbott i-stat and architect assays |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neur.2020.0037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT korleyfrederickk comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT datwylersaula comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT jainsonia comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT sunxiaoying comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT beligeregangamani comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT chandranraj comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT marinojaimea comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT mcquistonbeth comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT zhanghongwei comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT caudlekristal comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT wangkevinkw comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT puccioavam comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT okonkwodavido comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT yuejohnk comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT taylorsabrinar comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT markowitzamy comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT manleygeoffreyt comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays AT diazarrastiaramon comparisonofgfapanduchl1measurementsfromtwoprototypeassaystheabbottistatandarchitectassays |