Cargando…

Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52

The food enzyme α‐amylase (1,4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 by Danisco US Inc. The production strain contains multiple copies of an antimicrobial resistance gene. However, based on the absence of viable cell...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambré, Claude, Barat Baviera, José Manuel, Bolognesi, Claudia, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Crebelli, Riccardo, Gott, David Michael, Grob, Konrad, Lampi, Evgenia, Mengelers, Marcel, Mortensen, Alicja, Rivière, Gilles, Steffensen, Inger‐Lise, Tlustos, Christina, van Loveren, Henk, Vernis, Laurence, Zorn, Holger, Kärenlampi, Sirpa, Penninks, André, Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena, Gomes, Ana, Kovalkovičová, Natália, Liu, Yi, Maia, Joaquim, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Chesson, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968252
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6564
_version_ 1783686534611861504
author Lambré, Claude
Barat Baviera, José Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mengelers, Marcel
Mortensen, Alicja
Rivière, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger‐Lise
Tlustos, Christina
van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Zorn, Holger
Kärenlampi, Sirpa
Penninks, André
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Gomes, Ana
Kovalkovičová, Natália
Liu, Yi
Maia, Joaquim
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Chesson, Andrew
author_facet Lambré, Claude
Barat Baviera, José Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mengelers, Marcel
Mortensen, Alicja
Rivière, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger‐Lise
Tlustos, Christina
van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Zorn, Holger
Kärenlampi, Sirpa
Penninks, André
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Gomes, Ana
Kovalkovičová, Natália
Liu, Yi
Maia, Joaquim
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Chesson, Andrew
collection PubMed
description The food enzyme α‐amylase (1,4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 by Danisco US Inc. The production strain contains multiple copies of an antimicrobial resistance gene. However, based on the absence of viable cells and DNA from the production organism in the food enzyme, this is not considered to be a risk. The α‐amylase is intended to be used in starch processing for the production of glucose syrups, brewing processes and distilled alcohol production. Since residual amounts of the food enzyme are removed by the purification steps applied during the production of glucose syrups and distillation, no dietary exposure was calculated. Based on the maximum use levels recommended for the brewing processes and individual data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database, dietary exposure to the enzyme–total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.145 TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. The toxicity studies were carried out with another α‐amylase from B. licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb54, considered by the Panel as a suitable substitute. Toxicological tests indicated that there was no concern with respect to genotoxicity or systemic toxicity. A no observed adverse effect level was identified in rats which, compared with the dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 750. A search for similarity of the amino acid sequence to known allergens was made and one match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions can be excluded in distilled alcohol production and is considered low when the enzyme is used in starch processing and brewing. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8086574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80865742021-05-07 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Kärenlampi, Sirpa Penninks, André Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Gomes, Ana Kovalkovičová, Natália Liu, Yi Maia, Joaquim Engel, Karl‐Heinz Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme α‐amylase (1,4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 by Danisco US Inc. The production strain contains multiple copies of an antimicrobial resistance gene. However, based on the absence of viable cells and DNA from the production organism in the food enzyme, this is not considered to be a risk. The α‐amylase is intended to be used in starch processing for the production of glucose syrups, brewing processes and distilled alcohol production. Since residual amounts of the food enzyme are removed by the purification steps applied during the production of glucose syrups and distillation, no dietary exposure was calculated. Based on the maximum use levels recommended for the brewing processes and individual data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database, dietary exposure to the enzyme–total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.145 TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. The toxicity studies were carried out with another α‐amylase from B. licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb54, considered by the Panel as a suitable substitute. Toxicological tests indicated that there was no concern with respect to genotoxicity or systemic toxicity. A no observed adverse effect level was identified in rats which, compared with the dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 750. A search for similarity of the amino acid sequence to known allergens was made and one match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions can be excluded in distilled alcohol production and is considered low when the enzyme is used in starch processing and brewing. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8086574/ /pubmed/33968252 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6564 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Lambré, Claude
Barat Baviera, José Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mengelers, Marcel
Mortensen, Alicja
Rivière, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger‐Lise
Tlustos, Christina
van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Zorn, Holger
Kärenlampi, Sirpa
Penninks, André
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Gomes, Ana
Kovalkovičová, Natália
Liu, Yi
Maia, Joaquim
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Chesson, Andrew
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52
title Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52
title_full Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52
title_fullStr Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52
title_full_unstemmed Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52
title_short Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52
title_sort safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified bacillus licheniformis strain dp‐dzb52
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968252
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6564
work_keys_str_mv AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT lambreclaude safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT mengelersmarcel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT karenlampisirpa safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT penninksandre safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT gomesana safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT kovalkovicovanatalia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT maiajoaquim safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT engelkarlheinz safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52
AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52