Cargando…
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52
The food enzyme α‐amylase (1,4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 by Danisco US Inc. The production strain contains multiple copies of an antimicrobial resistance gene. However, based on the absence of viable cell...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968252 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6564 |
_version_ | 1783686534611861504 |
---|---|
author | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Kärenlampi, Sirpa Penninks, André Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Gomes, Ana Kovalkovičová, Natália Liu, Yi Maia, Joaquim Engel, Karl‐Heinz Chesson, Andrew |
author_facet | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Kärenlampi, Sirpa Penninks, André Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Gomes, Ana Kovalkovičová, Natália Liu, Yi Maia, Joaquim Engel, Karl‐Heinz Chesson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The food enzyme α‐amylase (1,4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 by Danisco US Inc. The production strain contains multiple copies of an antimicrobial resistance gene. However, based on the absence of viable cells and DNA from the production organism in the food enzyme, this is not considered to be a risk. The α‐amylase is intended to be used in starch processing for the production of glucose syrups, brewing processes and distilled alcohol production. Since residual amounts of the food enzyme are removed by the purification steps applied during the production of glucose syrups and distillation, no dietary exposure was calculated. Based on the maximum use levels recommended for the brewing processes and individual data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database, dietary exposure to the enzyme–total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.145 TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. The toxicity studies were carried out with another α‐amylase from B. licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb54, considered by the Panel as a suitable substitute. Toxicological tests indicated that there was no concern with respect to genotoxicity or systemic toxicity. A no observed adverse effect level was identified in rats which, compared with the dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 750. A search for similarity of the amino acid sequence to known allergens was made and one match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions can be excluded in distilled alcohol production and is considered low when the enzyme is used in starch processing and brewing. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8086574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80865742021-05-07 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Kärenlampi, Sirpa Penninks, André Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Gomes, Ana Kovalkovičová, Natália Liu, Yi Maia, Joaquim Engel, Karl‐Heinz Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme α‐amylase (1,4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 by Danisco US Inc. The production strain contains multiple copies of an antimicrobial resistance gene. However, based on the absence of viable cells and DNA from the production organism in the food enzyme, this is not considered to be a risk. The α‐amylase is intended to be used in starch processing for the production of glucose syrups, brewing processes and distilled alcohol production. Since residual amounts of the food enzyme are removed by the purification steps applied during the production of glucose syrups and distillation, no dietary exposure was calculated. Based on the maximum use levels recommended for the brewing processes and individual data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database, dietary exposure to the enzyme–total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.145 TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. The toxicity studies were carried out with another α‐amylase from B. licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb54, considered by the Panel as a suitable substitute. Toxicological tests indicated that there was no concern with respect to genotoxicity or systemic toxicity. A no observed adverse effect level was identified in rats which, compared with the dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 750. A search for similarity of the amino acid sequence to known allergens was made and one match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions can be excluded in distilled alcohol production and is considered low when the enzyme is used in starch processing and brewing. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8086574/ /pubmed/33968252 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6564 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Kärenlampi, Sirpa Penninks, André Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Gomes, Ana Kovalkovičová, Natália Liu, Yi Maia, Joaquim Engel, Karl‐Heinz Chesson, Andrew Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 |
title | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 |
title_full | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 |
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 |
title_short | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb52 |
title_sort | safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified bacillus licheniformis strain dp‐dzb52 |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968252 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT lambreclaude safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT mengelersmarcel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT karenlampisirpa safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT penninksandre safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT gomesana safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT kovalkovicovanatalia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT maiajoaquim safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT engelkarlheinz safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb52 |