Cargando…
The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study
INTRODUCTION: There is a global trend towards place-based initiatives (PBIs) to break the cycle of disadvantage and promote positive child development. Co-location is a common element of these initiatives and is intended to deliver more coordinated services for families of young children. This paper...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981191 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5581 |
_version_ | 1783686564164927488 |
---|---|
author | Jose, Kim Taylor, Catherine L. Jones, Rachael Banks, Susan Stafford, Joel Zubrick, Stephen R. Stubbs, M’Lynda Preen, David B. Venn, Alison Hansen, Emily |
author_facet | Jose, Kim Taylor, Catherine L. Jones, Rachael Banks, Susan Stafford, Joel Zubrick, Stephen R. Stubbs, M’Lynda Preen, David B. Venn, Alison Hansen, Emily |
author_sort | Jose, Kim |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is a global trend towards place-based initiatives (PBIs) to break the cycle of disadvantage and promote positive child development. Co-location is a common element of these initiatives and is intended to deliver more coordinated services for families of young children. This paper examines how co-locating early childhood services (ECS) from health and education in Child and Family Centres (CFCs) has impacted collaboration between services. METHODS: This ethnographic study included 130 participant observation sessions in ECS between April 2017 and December 2018 and semi-structured interviews with 45 early childhood service providers and 39 parents/carers with pre-school aged children. RESULTS: Service providers based in CFCs reported that co-location of services was facilitating local cooperation and collaboration between services. However, insufficient information sharing between services, prioritising client contact over collaborative practice and limited shared professional development remained barriers to collaborative practice. For parents, co-location improved access to services, but they experienced services independently of each other. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Co-location of ECS in CFCs contributed to greater cooperation and collaboration between services. However, for the potential of CFCs to be fully realised there remains a need for governance that better integrates service policies, systems and processes that explicitly support collaborative practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8086726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80867262021-05-11 The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study Jose, Kim Taylor, Catherine L. Jones, Rachael Banks, Susan Stafford, Joel Zubrick, Stephen R. Stubbs, M’Lynda Preen, David B. Venn, Alison Hansen, Emily Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: There is a global trend towards place-based initiatives (PBIs) to break the cycle of disadvantage and promote positive child development. Co-location is a common element of these initiatives and is intended to deliver more coordinated services for families of young children. This paper examines how co-locating early childhood services (ECS) from health and education in Child and Family Centres (CFCs) has impacted collaboration between services. METHODS: This ethnographic study included 130 participant observation sessions in ECS between April 2017 and December 2018 and semi-structured interviews with 45 early childhood service providers and 39 parents/carers with pre-school aged children. RESULTS: Service providers based in CFCs reported that co-location of services was facilitating local cooperation and collaboration between services. However, insufficient information sharing between services, prioritising client contact over collaborative practice and limited shared professional development remained barriers to collaborative practice. For parents, co-location improved access to services, but they experienced services independently of each other. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Co-location of ECS in CFCs contributed to greater cooperation and collaboration between services. However, for the potential of CFCs to be fully realised there remains a need for governance that better integrates service policies, systems and processes that explicitly support collaborative practice. Ubiquity Press 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8086726/ /pubmed/33981191 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5581 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research and Theory Jose, Kim Taylor, Catherine L. Jones, Rachael Banks, Susan Stafford, Joel Zubrick, Stephen R. Stubbs, M’Lynda Preen, David B. Venn, Alison Hansen, Emily The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study |
title | The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study |
title_full | The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study |
title_fullStr | The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study |
title_short | The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study |
title_sort | impact on service collaboration of co-location of early childhood services in tasmanian child and family centres: an ethnographic study |
topic | Research and Theory |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981191 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT josekim theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT taylorcatherinel theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT jonesrachael theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT bankssusan theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT staffordjoel theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT zubrickstephenr theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT stubbsmlynda theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT preendavidb theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT vennalison theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT hansenemily theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT josekim impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT taylorcatherinel impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT jonesrachael impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT bankssusan impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT staffordjoel impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT zubrickstephenr impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT stubbsmlynda impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT preendavidb impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT vennalison impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy AT hansenemily impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy |