Cargando…

The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study

INTRODUCTION: There is a global trend towards place-based initiatives (PBIs) to break the cycle of disadvantage and promote positive child development. Co-location is a common element of these initiatives and is intended to deliver more coordinated services for families of young children. This paper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jose, Kim, Taylor, Catherine L., Jones, Rachael, Banks, Susan, Stafford, Joel, Zubrick, Stephen R., Stubbs, M’Lynda, Preen, David B., Venn, Alison, Hansen, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981191
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5581
_version_ 1783686564164927488
author Jose, Kim
Taylor, Catherine L.
Jones, Rachael
Banks, Susan
Stafford, Joel
Zubrick, Stephen R.
Stubbs, M’Lynda
Preen, David B.
Venn, Alison
Hansen, Emily
author_facet Jose, Kim
Taylor, Catherine L.
Jones, Rachael
Banks, Susan
Stafford, Joel
Zubrick, Stephen R.
Stubbs, M’Lynda
Preen, David B.
Venn, Alison
Hansen, Emily
author_sort Jose, Kim
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is a global trend towards place-based initiatives (PBIs) to break the cycle of disadvantage and promote positive child development. Co-location is a common element of these initiatives and is intended to deliver more coordinated services for families of young children. This paper examines how co-locating early childhood services (ECS) from health and education in Child and Family Centres (CFCs) has impacted collaboration between services. METHODS: This ethnographic study included 130 participant observation sessions in ECS between April 2017 and December 2018 and semi-structured interviews with 45 early childhood service providers and 39 parents/carers with pre-school aged children. RESULTS: Service providers based in CFCs reported that co-location of services was facilitating local cooperation and collaboration between services. However, insufficient information sharing between services, prioritising client contact over collaborative practice and limited shared professional development remained barriers to collaborative practice. For parents, co-location improved access to services, but they experienced services independently of each other. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Co-location of ECS in CFCs contributed to greater cooperation and collaboration between services. However, for the potential of CFCs to be fully realised there remains a need for governance that better integrates service policies, systems and processes that explicitly support collaborative practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8086726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80867262021-05-11 The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study Jose, Kim Taylor, Catherine L. Jones, Rachael Banks, Susan Stafford, Joel Zubrick, Stephen R. Stubbs, M’Lynda Preen, David B. Venn, Alison Hansen, Emily Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: There is a global trend towards place-based initiatives (PBIs) to break the cycle of disadvantage and promote positive child development. Co-location is a common element of these initiatives and is intended to deliver more coordinated services for families of young children. This paper examines how co-locating early childhood services (ECS) from health and education in Child and Family Centres (CFCs) has impacted collaboration between services. METHODS: This ethnographic study included 130 participant observation sessions in ECS between April 2017 and December 2018 and semi-structured interviews with 45 early childhood service providers and 39 parents/carers with pre-school aged children. RESULTS: Service providers based in CFCs reported that co-location of services was facilitating local cooperation and collaboration between services. However, insufficient information sharing between services, prioritising client contact over collaborative practice and limited shared professional development remained barriers to collaborative practice. For parents, co-location improved access to services, but they experienced services independently of each other. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Co-location of ECS in CFCs contributed to greater cooperation and collaboration between services. However, for the potential of CFCs to be fully realised there remains a need for governance that better integrates service policies, systems and processes that explicitly support collaborative practice. Ubiquity Press 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8086726/ /pubmed/33981191 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5581 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research and Theory
Jose, Kim
Taylor, Catherine L.
Jones, Rachael
Banks, Susan
Stafford, Joel
Zubrick, Stephen R.
Stubbs, M’Lynda
Preen, David B.
Venn, Alison
Hansen, Emily
The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study
title The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study
title_full The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study
title_fullStr The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study
title_full_unstemmed The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study
title_short The Impact on Service Collaboration of Co-location of Early Childhood Services in Tasmanian Child and Family Centres: An Ethnographic Study
title_sort impact on service collaboration of co-location of early childhood services in tasmanian child and family centres: an ethnographic study
topic Research and Theory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981191
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5581
work_keys_str_mv AT josekim theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT taylorcatherinel theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT jonesrachael theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT bankssusan theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT staffordjoel theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT zubrickstephenr theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT stubbsmlynda theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT preendavidb theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT vennalison theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT hansenemily theimpactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT josekim impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT taylorcatherinel impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT jonesrachael impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT bankssusan impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT staffordjoel impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT zubrickstephenr impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT stubbsmlynda impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT preendavidb impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT vennalison impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy
AT hansenemily impactonservicecollaborationofcolocationofearlychildhoodservicesintasmanianchildandfamilycentresanethnographicstudy