Cargando…

Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration

Electrovibration holds great potential for creating vivid and realistic haptic sensations on touchscreens. Ideally, a designer should be able to control what users feel independent of the number of fingers they use, the movements they make, and how hard they press. We sought to understand the percep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vardar, Yasemin, Kuchenbecker, Katherine J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33784888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2020.0783
_version_ 1783686583903322112
author Vardar, Yasemin
Kuchenbecker, Katherine J.
author_facet Vardar, Yasemin
Kuchenbecker, Katherine J.
author_sort Vardar, Yasemin
collection PubMed
description Electrovibration holds great potential for creating vivid and realistic haptic sensations on touchscreens. Ideally, a designer should be able to control what users feel independent of the number of fingers they use, the movements they make, and how hard they press. We sought to understand the perception and physics of such interactions by determining the smallest 125 Hz electrovibration voltage that 15 participants could reliably feel when performing four different touch interactions at two normal forces. The results proved for the first time that both finger motion and contact by a second finger significantly affect what the user feels. At a given voltage, a single moving finger experiences much larger fluctuating electrovibration forces than a single stationary finger, making electrovibration much easier to feel during interactions involving finger movement. Indeed, only about 30% of participants could detect the stimulus without motion. Part of this difference comes from the fact that relative motion greatly increases the electrical impedance between a finger and the screen, as shown via detailed measurements from one individual. By contrast, threshold-level electrovibration did not significantly affect the coefficient of kinetic friction in any conditions. These findings help lay the groundwork for delivering consistent haptic feedback via electrovibration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8086864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80868642021-05-21 Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration Vardar, Yasemin Kuchenbecker, Katherine J. J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Engineering interface Electrovibration holds great potential for creating vivid and realistic haptic sensations on touchscreens. Ideally, a designer should be able to control what users feel independent of the number of fingers they use, the movements they make, and how hard they press. We sought to understand the perception and physics of such interactions by determining the smallest 125 Hz electrovibration voltage that 15 participants could reliably feel when performing four different touch interactions at two normal forces. The results proved for the first time that both finger motion and contact by a second finger significantly affect what the user feels. At a given voltage, a single moving finger experiences much larger fluctuating electrovibration forces than a single stationary finger, making electrovibration much easier to feel during interactions involving finger movement. Indeed, only about 30% of participants could detect the stimulus without motion. Part of this difference comes from the fact that relative motion greatly increases the electrical impedance between a finger and the screen, as shown via detailed measurements from one individual. By contrast, threshold-level electrovibration did not significantly affect the coefficient of kinetic friction in any conditions. These findings help lay the groundwork for delivering consistent haptic feedback via electrovibration. The Royal Society 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8086864/ /pubmed/33784888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2020.0783 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Life Sciences–Engineering interface
Vardar, Yasemin
Kuchenbecker, Katherine J.
Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration
title Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration
title_full Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration
title_fullStr Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration
title_full_unstemmed Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration
title_short Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration
title_sort finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration
topic Life Sciences–Engineering interface
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33784888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2020.0783
work_keys_str_mv AT vardaryasemin fingermotionandcontactbyasecondfingerinfluencethetactileperceptionofelectrovibration
AT kuchenbeckerkatherinej fingermotionandcontactbyasecondfingerinfluencethetactileperceptionofelectrovibration