Cargando…
Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration
Electrovibration holds great potential for creating vivid and realistic haptic sensations on touchscreens. Ideally, a designer should be able to control what users feel independent of the number of fingers they use, the movements they make, and how hard they press. We sought to understand the percep...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33784888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2020.0783 |
_version_ | 1783686583903322112 |
---|---|
author | Vardar, Yasemin Kuchenbecker, Katherine J. |
author_facet | Vardar, Yasemin Kuchenbecker, Katherine J. |
author_sort | Vardar, Yasemin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electrovibration holds great potential for creating vivid and realistic haptic sensations on touchscreens. Ideally, a designer should be able to control what users feel independent of the number of fingers they use, the movements they make, and how hard they press. We sought to understand the perception and physics of such interactions by determining the smallest 125 Hz electrovibration voltage that 15 participants could reliably feel when performing four different touch interactions at two normal forces. The results proved for the first time that both finger motion and contact by a second finger significantly affect what the user feels. At a given voltage, a single moving finger experiences much larger fluctuating electrovibration forces than a single stationary finger, making electrovibration much easier to feel during interactions involving finger movement. Indeed, only about 30% of participants could detect the stimulus without motion. Part of this difference comes from the fact that relative motion greatly increases the electrical impedance between a finger and the screen, as shown via detailed measurements from one individual. By contrast, threshold-level electrovibration did not significantly affect the coefficient of kinetic friction in any conditions. These findings help lay the groundwork for delivering consistent haptic feedback via electrovibration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8086864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80868642021-05-21 Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration Vardar, Yasemin Kuchenbecker, Katherine J. J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Engineering interface Electrovibration holds great potential for creating vivid and realistic haptic sensations on touchscreens. Ideally, a designer should be able to control what users feel independent of the number of fingers they use, the movements they make, and how hard they press. We sought to understand the perception and physics of such interactions by determining the smallest 125 Hz electrovibration voltage that 15 participants could reliably feel when performing four different touch interactions at two normal forces. The results proved for the first time that both finger motion and contact by a second finger significantly affect what the user feels. At a given voltage, a single moving finger experiences much larger fluctuating electrovibration forces than a single stationary finger, making electrovibration much easier to feel during interactions involving finger movement. Indeed, only about 30% of participants could detect the stimulus without motion. Part of this difference comes from the fact that relative motion greatly increases the electrical impedance between a finger and the screen, as shown via detailed measurements from one individual. By contrast, threshold-level electrovibration did not significantly affect the coefficient of kinetic friction in any conditions. These findings help lay the groundwork for delivering consistent haptic feedback via electrovibration. The Royal Society 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8086864/ /pubmed/33784888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2020.0783 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Life Sciences–Engineering interface Vardar, Yasemin Kuchenbecker, Katherine J. Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration |
title | Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration |
title_full | Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration |
title_fullStr | Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration |
title_full_unstemmed | Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration |
title_short | Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration |
title_sort | finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration |
topic | Life Sciences–Engineering interface |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33784888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2020.0783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vardaryasemin fingermotionandcontactbyasecondfingerinfluencethetactileperceptionofelectrovibration AT kuchenbeckerkatherinej fingermotionandcontactbyasecondfingerinfluencethetactileperceptionofelectrovibration |