Haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients have severely impaired post-occlusive skin forearm vasodilatory response assessed with laser speckle contrast imaging

BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction is associated with cardiovascular events and mortality in various disease states, including end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Novel technological approaches have emerged for real-time assessment of endothelial reactivity. This study examined skin microcirculation using laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) before and after arterial occlusion in ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). METHODS: The 38 HD patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio with 38 PD patients (for age, sex and dialysis vintage) and 38 controls (for age and sex). Skin microvascular reactivity parameters assessed with LSCI included baseline perfusion, occlusion perfusion and peak perfusion during post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia (PORH); time to peak perfusion; proportional change from baseline to peak perfusion; baseline and peak cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC); proportional change from baseline to peak CVC and amplitude of the PORH response (i.e. the difference between peak and baseline CVC). RESULTS: Baseline perfusion [HD: 46.97 ± 14.6; PD: 49.32 ± 18.07; controls: 42.02 ± 11.94 laser specle perfusion units (LSPU), P = 0.097] and peak post-occlusion perfusion (104.77 ± 28.68 versus 109.04 ± 40.77 versus 116.96 ± 30.96 LSPU, P = 0.238) did not differ significantly between groups. However, the post-occlusive vascular response was completely different since the proportional increase from baseline to peak perfusion (HD: 133 ± 66; PD: 149 ± 125; controls: 187 ± 61%, P = 0.001) was significantly lower in ESRD patients and time to peak response was lower in HD but similar in PD patients compared with controls (HD: 7.24 ± 6.99; PD: 10.68 ± 9.45; controls: 11.11 ± 5.1 s, Kruskal–Wallis P = 0.003; pairwise comparisons: HD versus controls, P = 0.002; HD versus PD, P = 0.154; PD versus controls, P = 0.406). ESRD patients also had lower levels of peak CVC, indicating the maximum capillary recruitment (HD: 1.05 ± 0.3; PD: 1.07 ± 0.44; controls: 1.57 ± 0.52 LSPU/mmHg, P < 0.001), lower proportional increase of CVC at peak (P < 0.001) and lower amplitude of the PORH response, a measure of the difference between baseline and maximum capillary recruitment (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using this novel non-invasive technology, endothelial post-occlusive forearm skin vasodilatory response was found to be similar between HD and PD patients and significantly impaired compared with controls. Future studies are needed to assess the prognostic implications of this microcirculatory functional defect.