Cargando…

Analysis of conflict of interest policies among organizations producing clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND: Conflicts of interest (COI) jeopardize the validity of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). When the Institute of Medicine promulgated COI policies in 2011, few organizations met these requirements, but it is unknown if organizations have improved their policies since that time. We sough...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brems, J. Henry, Davis, Andrea E., Clayton, Ellen Wright
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8087455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33930893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249267
_version_ 1783686665645064192
author Brems, J. Henry
Davis, Andrea E.
Clayton, Ellen Wright
author_facet Brems, J. Henry
Davis, Andrea E.
Clayton, Ellen Wright
author_sort Brems, J. Henry
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conflicts of interest (COI) jeopardize the validity of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). When the Institute of Medicine promulgated COI policies in 2011, few organizations met these requirements, but it is unknown if organizations have improved their policies since that time. We sought to evaluate current adherence to IOM standards of COI policies. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a retrospective document review of COI policies and CPGs from organizations that published five or more CPGs between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019. Organizations were identified via CPG databases. COI policies were obtained from an internet search. We collected data on i) the number of organizations that have COI policies specific to CPG development, ii) the number of policies meeting each IOM standard and iii) the number of IOM standards met by each policy. COI disclosures from five CPGs of each organization were assessed for adherence to IOM standards. Among the 46 organizations that published 5 or more CPGs, 36 (78%) had a COI policy. Standard 2.2b (requiring divestment of financial COI) was met least frequently, by 2 of 36 (6%) organizations. Standard 2.1 (requiring disclosure of COI) was met most frequently, by 33 of 36 (92%) organizations. A total of 31 of 36 (86%) organizations met 4 or fewer of the 7 IOM standards. Among the 16 organizations limiting COI to a minority of the CPG panel (standard 2.4c) and the 15 organizations prohibiting COI among chairs or co-chairs (standard 2.4d), 12 (75%) and 10 (67%) organizations violated the respective standard in at least one CPG. The main limitations of our study are the exclusion of organizations producing fewer CPGs and ability to assess only publicly available policies. CONCLUSION: Among organizations producing CPGs, COI policies frequently do not meet IOM standards, and organizations often violate their own policies. These shortcomings may undermine the public trust in and thus the utility of CPGs. CPG-producing organizations should improve their COI policies and their strategies to manage COI to increase the trustworthiness of CPGs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8087455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80874552021-05-11 Analysis of conflict of interest policies among organizations producing clinical practice guidelines Brems, J. Henry Davis, Andrea E. Clayton, Ellen Wright PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Conflicts of interest (COI) jeopardize the validity of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). When the Institute of Medicine promulgated COI policies in 2011, few organizations met these requirements, but it is unknown if organizations have improved their policies since that time. We sought to evaluate current adherence to IOM standards of COI policies. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a retrospective document review of COI policies and CPGs from organizations that published five or more CPGs between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019. Organizations were identified via CPG databases. COI policies were obtained from an internet search. We collected data on i) the number of organizations that have COI policies specific to CPG development, ii) the number of policies meeting each IOM standard and iii) the number of IOM standards met by each policy. COI disclosures from five CPGs of each organization were assessed for adherence to IOM standards. Among the 46 organizations that published 5 or more CPGs, 36 (78%) had a COI policy. Standard 2.2b (requiring divestment of financial COI) was met least frequently, by 2 of 36 (6%) organizations. Standard 2.1 (requiring disclosure of COI) was met most frequently, by 33 of 36 (92%) organizations. A total of 31 of 36 (86%) organizations met 4 or fewer of the 7 IOM standards. Among the 16 organizations limiting COI to a minority of the CPG panel (standard 2.4c) and the 15 organizations prohibiting COI among chairs or co-chairs (standard 2.4d), 12 (75%) and 10 (67%) organizations violated the respective standard in at least one CPG. The main limitations of our study are the exclusion of organizations producing fewer CPGs and ability to assess only publicly available policies. CONCLUSION: Among organizations producing CPGs, COI policies frequently do not meet IOM standards, and organizations often violate their own policies. These shortcomings may undermine the public trust in and thus the utility of CPGs. CPG-producing organizations should improve their COI policies and their strategies to manage COI to increase the trustworthiness of CPGs. Public Library of Science 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8087455/ /pubmed/33930893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249267 Text en © 2021 Brems et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brems, J. Henry
Davis, Andrea E.
Clayton, Ellen Wright
Analysis of conflict of interest policies among organizations producing clinical practice guidelines
title Analysis of conflict of interest policies among organizations producing clinical practice guidelines
title_full Analysis of conflict of interest policies among organizations producing clinical practice guidelines
title_fullStr Analysis of conflict of interest policies among organizations producing clinical practice guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of conflict of interest policies among organizations producing clinical practice guidelines
title_short Analysis of conflict of interest policies among organizations producing clinical practice guidelines
title_sort analysis of conflict of interest policies among organizations producing clinical practice guidelines
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8087455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33930893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249267
work_keys_str_mv AT bremsjhenry analysisofconflictofinterestpoliciesamongorganizationsproducingclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT davisandreae analysisofconflictofinterestpoliciesamongorganizationsproducingclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT claytonellenwright analysisofconflictofinterestpoliciesamongorganizationsproducingclinicalpracticeguidelines