Cargando…

Fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment in the UK during the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND: Public Health England guidance stipulates the use of filtering facepiece (FFP3) masks for healthcare workers engaged in aerosol-generating procedures. Mask fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment is essential to protect healthcare workers from aerosolized particles. AIM: To analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Green, S., Gani, A., Bailey, M., Brown, O., Hing, C.B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8087583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33940089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.04.024
_version_ 1783686694635044864
author Green, S.
Gani, A.
Bailey, M.
Brown, O.
Hing, C.B.
author_facet Green, S.
Gani, A.
Bailey, M.
Brown, O.
Hing, C.B.
author_sort Green, S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Public Health England guidance stipulates the use of filtering facepiece (FFP3) masks for healthcare workers engaged in aerosol-generating procedures. Mask fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment is essential to protect healthcare workers from aerosolized particles. AIM: To analyse the outcome of mask fit-testing across National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in the UK during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: Using the Freedom of Information Act, 137 NHS hospitals were approached on May 26(th), 2020 by an independent researcher to provide data on the outcome of fit-testing at each site. FINDINGS: Ninety-six hospitals responded to the request between May 26(th), 2020 to October 29(th), 2020. There was a total of 86 mask types used across 56 hospitals, 13 of which were used in at least 10% of these hospitals; the most frequently used was the FFP3M1863, used by 92.86% of hospitals. Overall fit-testing pass rates were provided by 32 hospitals with mean pass rate of 80.74%. The most successful masks, in terms of fit-test failure rates, were the Alpha Solway 3030V and the Alpha Solway S–3V (both reporting mean fit-test failures of 2%). Male- and female-specific pass and failure rates were provided by seven hospitals. Across the seven hospitals, 20.1% of men tested failed the fit-test for all masks used, whereas 19.9% of women tested failed the fit-test for all masks used. Failure rates were significantly higher in staff from Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) backgrounds 644/2507 (25.69%) across four hospitals. CONCLUSION: Twenty percent of healthcare workers tested during the first response to the pandemic failed fit-testing for masks. A small sample revealed that this was most prominent in staff from BAME backgrounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8087583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80875832021-05-03 Fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment in the UK during the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic Green, S. Gani, A. Bailey, M. Brown, O. Hing, C.B. J Hosp Infect Article BACKGROUND: Public Health England guidance stipulates the use of filtering facepiece (FFP3) masks for healthcare workers engaged in aerosol-generating procedures. Mask fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment is essential to protect healthcare workers from aerosolized particles. AIM: To analyse the outcome of mask fit-testing across National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in the UK during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: Using the Freedom of Information Act, 137 NHS hospitals were approached on May 26(th), 2020 by an independent researcher to provide data on the outcome of fit-testing at each site. FINDINGS: Ninety-six hospitals responded to the request between May 26(th), 2020 to October 29(th), 2020. There was a total of 86 mask types used across 56 hospitals, 13 of which were used in at least 10% of these hospitals; the most frequently used was the FFP3M1863, used by 92.86% of hospitals. Overall fit-testing pass rates were provided by 32 hospitals with mean pass rate of 80.74%. The most successful masks, in terms of fit-test failure rates, were the Alpha Solway 3030V and the Alpha Solway S–3V (both reporting mean fit-test failures of 2%). Male- and female-specific pass and failure rates were provided by seven hospitals. Across the seven hospitals, 20.1% of men tested failed the fit-test for all masks used, whereas 19.9% of women tested failed the fit-test for all masks used. Failure rates were significantly higher in staff from Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) backgrounds 644/2507 (25.69%) across four hospitals. CONCLUSION: Twenty percent of healthcare workers tested during the first response to the pandemic failed fit-testing for masks. A small sample revealed that this was most prominent in staff from BAME backgrounds. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society. 2021-07 2021-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8087583/ /pubmed/33940089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.04.024 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Green, S.
Gani, A.
Bailey, M.
Brown, O.
Hing, C.B.
Fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment in the UK during the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic
title Fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment in the UK during the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment in the UK during the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment in the UK during the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment in the UK during the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment in the UK during the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment in the uk during the initial response to the covid-19 pandemic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8087583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33940089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.04.024
work_keys_str_mv AT greens fittestingofrespiratoryprotectiveequipmentintheukduringtheinitialresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT gania fittestingofrespiratoryprotectiveequipmentintheukduringtheinitialresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT baileym fittestingofrespiratoryprotectiveequipmentintheukduringtheinitialresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT browno fittestingofrespiratoryprotectiveequipmentintheukduringtheinitialresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT hingcb fittestingofrespiratoryprotectiveequipmentintheukduringtheinitialresponsetothecovid19pandemic