Cargando…
Standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients
Standard blood laboratory parameters may have diagnostic potential, if polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) tests are not available on time. We evaluated standard blood laboratory parameters of 655 COVID-19 patients suspected to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, who underwent PCR testing in one of five hospit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8087776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88844-x |
_version_ | 1783686723491856384 |
---|---|
author | Thell, Rainer Zimmermann, Jascha Szell, Marton Tomez, Sabine Eisenburger, Philip Haugk, Moritz Kreil, Anna Spiel, Alexander Blaschke, Amelie Klicpera, Anna Janata, Oskar Krugluger, Walter Sebesta, Christian Herkner, Harald Laky, Brenda |
author_facet | Thell, Rainer Zimmermann, Jascha Szell, Marton Tomez, Sabine Eisenburger, Philip Haugk, Moritz Kreil, Anna Spiel, Alexander Blaschke, Amelie Klicpera, Anna Janata, Oskar Krugluger, Walter Sebesta, Christian Herkner, Harald Laky, Brenda |
author_sort | Thell, Rainer |
collection | PubMed |
description | Standard blood laboratory parameters may have diagnostic potential, if polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) tests are not available on time. We evaluated standard blood laboratory parameters of 655 COVID-19 patients suspected to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, who underwent PCR testing in one of five hospitals in Vienna, Austria. We compared laboratory parameters, clinical characteristics, and outcomes between positive and negative PCR-tested patients and evaluated the ability of those parameters to distinguish between groups. Of the 590 patients (20–100 years, 276 females and 314 males), 208 were PCR-positive. Positive compared to negative PCR-tested patients had significantly lower levels of leukocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocytes, and thrombocytes; while significantly higher levels were detected with erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, C-reactive-protein, ferritin, activated-partial-thromboplastin-time, alanine-aminotransferase, aspartate-aminotransferase, lipase, creatine-kinase, and lactate-dehydrogenase. From all blood parameters, eosinophils, ferritin, leukocytes, and erythrocytes showed the highest ability to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative patients (area-under-curve, AUC: 72.3–79.4%). The AUC of our model was 0.915 (95% confidence intervals, 0.876–0.955). Leukopenia, eosinopenia, elevated erythrocytes, and hemoglobin were among the strongest markers regarding accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and post-test probabilities. Our findings suggest that especially leukopenia, eosinopenia, and elevated hemoglobin are helpful to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative tested patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8087776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80877762021-05-03 Standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients Thell, Rainer Zimmermann, Jascha Szell, Marton Tomez, Sabine Eisenburger, Philip Haugk, Moritz Kreil, Anna Spiel, Alexander Blaschke, Amelie Klicpera, Anna Janata, Oskar Krugluger, Walter Sebesta, Christian Herkner, Harald Laky, Brenda Sci Rep Article Standard blood laboratory parameters may have diagnostic potential, if polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) tests are not available on time. We evaluated standard blood laboratory parameters of 655 COVID-19 patients suspected to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, who underwent PCR testing in one of five hospitals in Vienna, Austria. We compared laboratory parameters, clinical characteristics, and outcomes between positive and negative PCR-tested patients and evaluated the ability of those parameters to distinguish between groups. Of the 590 patients (20–100 years, 276 females and 314 males), 208 were PCR-positive. Positive compared to negative PCR-tested patients had significantly lower levels of leukocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocytes, and thrombocytes; while significantly higher levels were detected with erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, C-reactive-protein, ferritin, activated-partial-thromboplastin-time, alanine-aminotransferase, aspartate-aminotransferase, lipase, creatine-kinase, and lactate-dehydrogenase. From all blood parameters, eosinophils, ferritin, leukocytes, and erythrocytes showed the highest ability to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative patients (area-under-curve, AUC: 72.3–79.4%). The AUC of our model was 0.915 (95% confidence intervals, 0.876–0.955). Leukopenia, eosinopenia, elevated erythrocytes, and hemoglobin were among the strongest markers regarding accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and post-test probabilities. Our findings suggest that especially leukopenia, eosinopenia, and elevated hemoglobin are helpful to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative tested patients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8087776/ /pubmed/33931692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88844-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Thell, Rainer Zimmermann, Jascha Szell, Marton Tomez, Sabine Eisenburger, Philip Haugk, Moritz Kreil, Anna Spiel, Alexander Blaschke, Amelie Klicpera, Anna Janata, Oskar Krugluger, Walter Sebesta, Christian Herkner, Harald Laky, Brenda Standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients |
title | Standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients |
title_full | Standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients |
title_fullStr | Standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients |
title_short | Standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients |
title_sort | standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between sars-cov-2 positive and negative patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8087776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88844-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thellrainer standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT zimmermannjascha standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT szellmarton standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT tomezsabine standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT eisenburgerphilip standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT haugkmoritz standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT kreilanna standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT spielalexander standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT blaschkeamelie standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT klicperaanna standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT janataoskar standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT kruglugerwalter standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT sebestachristian standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT herknerharald standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients AT lakybrenda standardbloodlaboratoryvaluesasaclinicalsupporttooltodistinguishbetweensarscov2positiveandnegativepatients |