Cargando…

Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study

STUDY QUESTION: What are the important risk factors for having a caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Independent risk factors were smoking in the first trimester, higher parity, and previous caesarean section (CS) before the index caesarean delivery. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A spectrum of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gull, B, Klerelid, V, Jormeus, A, Strandell, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8087894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33959686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab019
_version_ 1783686751261294592
author Gull, B
Klerelid, V
Jormeus, A
Strandell, A
author_facet Gull, B
Klerelid, V
Jormeus, A
Strandell, A
author_sort Gull, B
collection PubMed
description STUDY QUESTION: What are the important risk factors for having a caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Independent risk factors were smoking in the first trimester, higher parity, and previous caesarean section (CS) before the index caesarean delivery. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A spectrum of risk factors for CSP has been suggested but not proven: parity, number of previous caesarean section, elective as opposed to emergency CS, IVF-pregnancy, breech presentation, previous gynaecological surgery as well as suture technique. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective case-control study included 31 women with a CSP during the period 2003–2018 treated at a tertiary care centre for gynaecology and reproduction. A control cohort of 8300 women with a history of a CS and a subsequent delivery during the same time period was formed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Variables describing demography, lifestyle factors, and reproductive and obstetric history were retrieved from medical records and the obstetric hospital database. Logistic regression analyses were applied to identify potential risk factors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In a multivariable analysis, smoking in first trimester (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.03, 95% CI 1.01–9.07), higher parity (adjusted OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03–1.64) and previous CS in addition to the preceding CS (adjusted OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.35–8.66) were independently predictive of a CSP. An elective CS at the index pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of CSP but did not remain significant in the multivariable analysis. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: CSP is a very rare phenomenon and several of the risk factor estimates are imprecise. Nevertheless, significant risk factors could be identified. Another limitation is the lack of electronically recorded details on suture techniques. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The identified factors, namely higher parity and previous CS before the index caesarean section, are in accordance with previously suggested risk factors. Whether there is a true risk association between elective CS and future CSP needs to be investigated further. Smoking in the first trimester is a new finding, which has a plausible rationale. These factors should be recognised when counselling women after a caesarean delivery, particularly in a subsequent pregnancy with early complications. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by a grant from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-720291). None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8087894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80878942021-05-05 Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study Gull, B Klerelid, V Jormeus, A Strandell, A Hum Reprod Open Original Article STUDY QUESTION: What are the important risk factors for having a caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Independent risk factors were smoking in the first trimester, higher parity, and previous caesarean section (CS) before the index caesarean delivery. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A spectrum of risk factors for CSP has been suggested but not proven: parity, number of previous caesarean section, elective as opposed to emergency CS, IVF-pregnancy, breech presentation, previous gynaecological surgery as well as suture technique. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective case-control study included 31 women with a CSP during the period 2003–2018 treated at a tertiary care centre for gynaecology and reproduction. A control cohort of 8300 women with a history of a CS and a subsequent delivery during the same time period was formed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Variables describing demography, lifestyle factors, and reproductive and obstetric history were retrieved from medical records and the obstetric hospital database. Logistic regression analyses were applied to identify potential risk factors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In a multivariable analysis, smoking in first trimester (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.03, 95% CI 1.01–9.07), higher parity (adjusted OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03–1.64) and previous CS in addition to the preceding CS (adjusted OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.35–8.66) were independently predictive of a CSP. An elective CS at the index pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of CSP but did not remain significant in the multivariable analysis. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: CSP is a very rare phenomenon and several of the risk factor estimates are imprecise. Nevertheless, significant risk factors could be identified. Another limitation is the lack of electronically recorded details on suture techniques. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The identified factors, namely higher parity and previous CS before the index caesarean section, are in accordance with previously suggested risk factors. Whether there is a true risk association between elective CS and future CSP needs to be investigated further. Smoking in the first trimester is a new finding, which has a plausible rationale. These factors should be recognised when counselling women after a caesarean delivery, particularly in a subsequent pregnancy with early complications. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by a grant from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-720291). None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare. Oxford University Press 2021-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8087894/ /pubmed/33959686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab019 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Gull, B
Klerelid, V
Jormeus, A
Strandell, A
Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
title Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
title_full Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
title_fullStr Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
title_short Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
title_sort potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8087894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33959686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab019
work_keys_str_mv AT gullb potentialriskfactorsforcaesareanscarpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT klerelidv potentialriskfactorsforcaesareanscarpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT jormeusa potentialriskfactorsforcaesareanscarpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT strandella potentialriskfactorsforcaesareanscarpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy