Cargando…
Telehealth use in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review
OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has presented emergency departments (EDs) with many challenges to address the acute care needs of patients. Many EDs have leveraged telehealth to innovatively respond to these challenges. This review describes the landscape of telehealth initiatives i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8087945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12443 |
_version_ | 1783686758436700160 |
---|---|
author | Jaffe, Todd A. Hayden, Emily Uscher‐Pines, Lori Sousa, Jessica Schwamm, Lee H. Mehrotra, Ateev Zachrison, Kori S. |
author_facet | Jaffe, Todd A. Hayden, Emily Uscher‐Pines, Lori Sousa, Jessica Schwamm, Lee H. Mehrotra, Ateev Zachrison, Kori S. |
author_sort | Jaffe, Todd A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has presented emergency departments (EDs) with many challenges to address the acute care needs of patients. Many EDs have leveraged telehealth to innovatively respond to these challenges. This review describes the landscape of telehealth initiatives in emergency care that have been described during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive, systematic review of the literature using PubMed, supplemented by a review of the gray literature (ie, non‐peer reviewed), with input from subject matter experts to identify telehealth initiatives in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019. We categorized types of telehealth use based on purpose and user characteristics. RESULTS: We included 27 papers from our review of the medical literature and another 8 sources from gray literature review. The vast majority of studies (32/35) were descriptive in nature, with the additional inclusion of 2 cohort studies and one randomized clinical trial. There were 5 categories of ED telehealth use during the pandemic: (1) pre‐ED evaluation and screening, (2) within ED (including as a means of limiting staff and patient exposure and facilitating consultation with specialists), (3) post‐ED discharge monitoring and treatment, (4) educating trainees and health care workers, and (5) coordinating resources and patient care. CONCLUSION: Telehealth has been used in a variety of manners during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, enabling innovation in emergency care delivery. The findings from this study can be used by institutions to consider how telehealth may address challenges in emergency care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and beyond. Because few studies included cost data and given the variability in institutional resources, how organizations implement telehealth programs will likely vary. Future work should further explore barriers and facilitators of innovation, and the impact on care delivery and patient outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8087945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80879452021-05-07 Telehealth use in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review Jaffe, Todd A. Hayden, Emily Uscher‐Pines, Lori Sousa, Jessica Schwamm, Lee H. Mehrotra, Ateev Zachrison, Kori S. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open The Practice of Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has presented emergency departments (EDs) with many challenges to address the acute care needs of patients. Many EDs have leveraged telehealth to innovatively respond to these challenges. This review describes the landscape of telehealth initiatives in emergency care that have been described during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive, systematic review of the literature using PubMed, supplemented by a review of the gray literature (ie, non‐peer reviewed), with input from subject matter experts to identify telehealth initiatives in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019. We categorized types of telehealth use based on purpose and user characteristics. RESULTS: We included 27 papers from our review of the medical literature and another 8 sources from gray literature review. The vast majority of studies (32/35) were descriptive in nature, with the additional inclusion of 2 cohort studies and one randomized clinical trial. There were 5 categories of ED telehealth use during the pandemic: (1) pre‐ED evaluation and screening, (2) within ED (including as a means of limiting staff and patient exposure and facilitating consultation with specialists), (3) post‐ED discharge monitoring and treatment, (4) educating trainees and health care workers, and (5) coordinating resources and patient care. CONCLUSION: Telehealth has been used in a variety of manners during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, enabling innovation in emergency care delivery. The findings from this study can be used by institutions to consider how telehealth may address challenges in emergency care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and beyond. Because few studies included cost data and given the variability in institutional resources, how organizations implement telehealth programs will likely vary. Future work should further explore barriers and facilitators of innovation, and the impact on care delivery and patient outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8087945/ /pubmed/33969356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12443 Text en © 2021 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | The Practice of Emergency Medicine Jaffe, Todd A. Hayden, Emily Uscher‐Pines, Lori Sousa, Jessica Schwamm, Lee H. Mehrotra, Ateev Zachrison, Kori S. Telehealth use in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review |
title | Telehealth use in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review |
title_full | Telehealth use in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Telehealth use in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Telehealth use in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review |
title_short | Telehealth use in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review |
title_sort | telehealth use in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review |
topic | The Practice of Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8087945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaffetodda telehealthuseinemergencycareduringcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreview AT haydenemily telehealthuseinemergencycareduringcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreview AT uscherpineslori telehealthuseinemergencycareduringcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreview AT sousajessica telehealthuseinemergencycareduringcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreview AT schwammleeh telehealthuseinemergencycareduringcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreview AT mehrotraateev telehealthuseinemergencycareduringcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreview AT zachrisonkoris telehealthuseinemergencycareduringcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreview |