Cargando…
Using the United Kingdom standards for public involvement to evaluate the impact of public involvement in a multinational clinical study
BACKGROUND: The publication of the United Kingdom (UK) Standards for Public Involvement (PI) (UK Standards) in research drew a clear line in the sand regarding the importance of utilising the unique experience, skills and expertise that lay people may offer to the development, conduct and disseminat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00264-3 |
_version_ | 1783686770391515136 |
---|---|
author | Seddon, Kathy Elliott, Jim Johnson, Miriam White, Clare Watson, Max Nelson, Annmarie Noble, Simon |
author_facet | Seddon, Kathy Elliott, Jim Johnson, Miriam White, Clare Watson, Max Nelson, Annmarie Noble, Simon |
author_sort | Seddon, Kathy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The publication of the United Kingdom (UK) Standards for Public Involvement (PI) (UK Standards) in research drew a clear line in the sand regarding the importance of utilising the unique experience, skills and expertise that lay people may offer to the development, conduct and dissemination of clinical research. The UK Standards provide a benchmark which researchers should aim to achieve, yet its implementation continues to be a step wise iterative process of change management. A recent evaluation by a regional research group has suggested that our understanding of PI is enhanced through reflection on the UK Standards. We report on the utility of PI in the design, conduct and dissemination of the HIDDen study, a national, multicentre clinical study based across three UK centres. METHODS: A retrospective review of PI within the HIDDen study was conducted using field notes taken by the lead author from interactions throughout their involvement as a lay representative on the study. Key members of the HIDDen study were interviewed and data analysed to explore adherence to the UK Standards. RESULTS: There was universal support for PI across the study management group with genuine inclusivity of lay members of the committee. All six of the UK Standards were met to varying degrees. The greatest opportunities lay in ‘working together’ and ‘support and learning’. There were challenges meeting ‘governance’ with evidence of participation in decision making but less evidence of opportunities in management, regulation, leadership. CONCLUSION: This study concurs with previous research supporting the utility of the Standards in the conduct and evaluation of PI in clinical research. To our knowledge this is the first multi-national study to be evaluated against the UK Standards. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-021-00264-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8088001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80880012021-05-03 Using the United Kingdom standards for public involvement to evaluate the impact of public involvement in a multinational clinical study Seddon, Kathy Elliott, Jim Johnson, Miriam White, Clare Watson, Max Nelson, Annmarie Noble, Simon Res Involv Engagem Methodology BACKGROUND: The publication of the United Kingdom (UK) Standards for Public Involvement (PI) (UK Standards) in research drew a clear line in the sand regarding the importance of utilising the unique experience, skills and expertise that lay people may offer to the development, conduct and dissemination of clinical research. The UK Standards provide a benchmark which researchers should aim to achieve, yet its implementation continues to be a step wise iterative process of change management. A recent evaluation by a regional research group has suggested that our understanding of PI is enhanced through reflection on the UK Standards. We report on the utility of PI in the design, conduct and dissemination of the HIDDen study, a national, multicentre clinical study based across three UK centres. METHODS: A retrospective review of PI within the HIDDen study was conducted using field notes taken by the lead author from interactions throughout their involvement as a lay representative on the study. Key members of the HIDDen study were interviewed and data analysed to explore adherence to the UK Standards. RESULTS: There was universal support for PI across the study management group with genuine inclusivity of lay members of the committee. All six of the UK Standards were met to varying degrees. The greatest opportunities lay in ‘working together’ and ‘support and learning’. There were challenges meeting ‘governance’ with evidence of participation in decision making but less evidence of opportunities in management, regulation, leadership. CONCLUSION: This study concurs with previous research supporting the utility of the Standards in the conduct and evaluation of PI in clinical research. To our knowledge this is the first multi-national study to be evaluated against the UK Standards. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-021-00264-3. BioMed Central 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8088001/ /pubmed/33931134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00264-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Seddon, Kathy Elliott, Jim Johnson, Miriam White, Clare Watson, Max Nelson, Annmarie Noble, Simon Using the United Kingdom standards for public involvement to evaluate the impact of public involvement in a multinational clinical study |
title | Using the United Kingdom standards for public involvement to evaluate the impact of public involvement in a multinational clinical study |
title_full | Using the United Kingdom standards for public involvement to evaluate the impact of public involvement in a multinational clinical study |
title_fullStr | Using the United Kingdom standards for public involvement to evaluate the impact of public involvement in a multinational clinical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Using the United Kingdom standards for public involvement to evaluate the impact of public involvement in a multinational clinical study |
title_short | Using the United Kingdom standards for public involvement to evaluate the impact of public involvement in a multinational clinical study |
title_sort | using the united kingdom standards for public involvement to evaluate the impact of public involvement in a multinational clinical study |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00264-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seddonkathy usingtheunitedkingdomstandardsforpublicinvolvementtoevaluatetheimpactofpublicinvolvementinamultinationalclinicalstudy AT elliottjim usingtheunitedkingdomstandardsforpublicinvolvementtoevaluatetheimpactofpublicinvolvementinamultinationalclinicalstudy AT johnsonmiriam usingtheunitedkingdomstandardsforpublicinvolvementtoevaluatetheimpactofpublicinvolvementinamultinationalclinicalstudy AT whiteclare usingtheunitedkingdomstandardsforpublicinvolvementtoevaluatetheimpactofpublicinvolvementinamultinationalclinicalstudy AT watsonmax usingtheunitedkingdomstandardsforpublicinvolvementtoevaluatetheimpactofpublicinvolvementinamultinationalclinicalstudy AT nelsonannmarie usingtheunitedkingdomstandardsforpublicinvolvementtoevaluatetheimpactofpublicinvolvementinamultinationalclinicalstudy AT noblesimon usingtheunitedkingdomstandardsforpublicinvolvementtoevaluatetheimpactofpublicinvolvementinamultinationalclinicalstudy |