Cargando…

Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer

BACKGROUND: The assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is still a problem. This study aimed to explore the choice of these assessment methods. METHODS: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was performed in 96 patients with advanced c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Wei, Xiong, Li, Zhu, Qiaoling, Lu, Hong, Zhong, Meiling, Liang, Meirong, Jiang, Wei, Wang, Yanan, Cheng, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33933005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08208-6
_version_ 1783686779269808128
author Li, Wei
Xiong, Li
Zhu, Qiaoling
Lu, Hong
Zhong, Meiling
Liang, Meirong
Jiang, Wei
Wang, Yanan
Cheng, Wei
author_facet Li, Wei
Xiong, Li
Zhu, Qiaoling
Lu, Hong
Zhong, Meiling
Liang, Meirong
Jiang, Wei
Wang, Yanan
Cheng, Wei
author_sort Li, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is still a problem. This study aimed to explore the choice of these assessment methods. METHODS: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was performed in 96 patients with advanced cervical cancer. The positive rates of lymph node metastasis were analyzed. The values of computed tomography lymph node minimum axial diameter (MAD) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), and their combination in predicting retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis were compared. High-risk factors for common iliac lymph node (CILN) and/or para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis were analyzed. RESULTS: The lymph node metastasis rate was 62.50% and the CILN and/or PALN metastasis rate was 31.25%. Overall, 96 patients had 172 visible lymph nodes. The positive rate of lymph node metastasis was significantly higher in the MAD ≥1.0 cm group (83.33%) than in the 0.5 cm ≤ MAD < 1.0 cm group (26.82%). The critical values of MAD and SCC-Ag in determining lymph node metastasis were 1.0 cm and 5.2 ng/mL, respectively. The accuracy, specificity, and Youden index of MAD ≥1.0 cm combined with SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL for evaluating lymph node metastasis were 75.71%, 100%, and 0.59, respectively, and were significantly different from the values for the MAD ≥1.0 cm (72.09%, 80.56%, and 0.47, respectively) and SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL (71.43%, 68.97%, and 0.42, respectively) groups. Correlation analysis showed that non-squamous cell carcinoma, pelvic lymph node (PLN) MAD ≥1.0 cm plus number ≥ 2, and 1 PLN MAD ≥1.0 cm with CILN and/or PALN MAD 0.5–1.0 cm were risk factors for CILN and/or PALN metastasis. CONCLUSION: Patients with MAD ≥1.0 cm and SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL, as well as high risk factors for CILN and/or PALN metastasis, should undergo resection of enlarged lymph nodes below the common iliac gland and lymphadenectomy of CILN/PALN to reduce tumor burden and to clarify lymph node metastasis status for accurate guidance in follow-up treatment. Patients with MAD < 1.0 cm and SCC-Ag < 5.2 ng/mL may be treated with chemoradiotherapy directly based on imaging, given the low lymph node metastasis rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8088051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80880512021-05-03 Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer Li, Wei Xiong, Li Zhu, Qiaoling Lu, Hong Zhong, Meiling Liang, Meirong Jiang, Wei Wang, Yanan Cheng, Wei BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is still a problem. This study aimed to explore the choice of these assessment methods. METHODS: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was performed in 96 patients with advanced cervical cancer. The positive rates of lymph node metastasis were analyzed. The values of computed tomography lymph node minimum axial diameter (MAD) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), and their combination in predicting retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis were compared. High-risk factors for common iliac lymph node (CILN) and/or para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis were analyzed. RESULTS: The lymph node metastasis rate was 62.50% and the CILN and/or PALN metastasis rate was 31.25%. Overall, 96 patients had 172 visible lymph nodes. The positive rate of lymph node metastasis was significantly higher in the MAD ≥1.0 cm group (83.33%) than in the 0.5 cm ≤ MAD < 1.0 cm group (26.82%). The critical values of MAD and SCC-Ag in determining lymph node metastasis were 1.0 cm and 5.2 ng/mL, respectively. The accuracy, specificity, and Youden index of MAD ≥1.0 cm combined with SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL for evaluating lymph node metastasis were 75.71%, 100%, and 0.59, respectively, and were significantly different from the values for the MAD ≥1.0 cm (72.09%, 80.56%, and 0.47, respectively) and SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL (71.43%, 68.97%, and 0.42, respectively) groups. Correlation analysis showed that non-squamous cell carcinoma, pelvic lymph node (PLN) MAD ≥1.0 cm plus number ≥ 2, and 1 PLN MAD ≥1.0 cm with CILN and/or PALN MAD 0.5–1.0 cm were risk factors for CILN and/or PALN metastasis. CONCLUSION: Patients with MAD ≥1.0 cm and SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL, as well as high risk factors for CILN and/or PALN metastasis, should undergo resection of enlarged lymph nodes below the common iliac gland and lymphadenectomy of CILN/PALN to reduce tumor burden and to clarify lymph node metastasis status for accurate guidance in follow-up treatment. Patients with MAD < 1.0 cm and SCC-Ag < 5.2 ng/mL may be treated with chemoradiotherapy directly based on imaging, given the low lymph node metastasis rate. BioMed Central 2021-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8088051/ /pubmed/33933005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08208-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Wei
Xiong, Li
Zhu, Qiaoling
Lu, Hong
Zhong, Meiling
Liang, Meirong
Jiang, Wei
Wang, Yanan
Cheng, Wei
Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer
title Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer
title_full Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer
title_fullStr Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer
title_short Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer
title_sort assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33933005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08208-6
work_keys_str_mv AT liwei assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT xiongli assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT zhuqiaoling assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT luhong assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT zhongmeiling assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT liangmeirong assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT jiangwei assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT wangyanan assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT chengwei assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer