Cargando…
Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer
BACKGROUND: The assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is still a problem. This study aimed to explore the choice of these assessment methods. METHODS: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was performed in 96 patients with advanced c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33933005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08208-6 |
_version_ | 1783686779269808128 |
---|---|
author | Li, Wei Xiong, Li Zhu, Qiaoling Lu, Hong Zhong, Meiling Liang, Meirong Jiang, Wei Wang, Yanan Cheng, Wei |
author_facet | Li, Wei Xiong, Li Zhu, Qiaoling Lu, Hong Zhong, Meiling Liang, Meirong Jiang, Wei Wang, Yanan Cheng, Wei |
author_sort | Li, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is still a problem. This study aimed to explore the choice of these assessment methods. METHODS: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was performed in 96 patients with advanced cervical cancer. The positive rates of lymph node metastasis were analyzed. The values of computed tomography lymph node minimum axial diameter (MAD) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), and their combination in predicting retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis were compared. High-risk factors for common iliac lymph node (CILN) and/or para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis were analyzed. RESULTS: The lymph node metastasis rate was 62.50% and the CILN and/or PALN metastasis rate was 31.25%. Overall, 96 patients had 172 visible lymph nodes. The positive rate of lymph node metastasis was significantly higher in the MAD ≥1.0 cm group (83.33%) than in the 0.5 cm ≤ MAD < 1.0 cm group (26.82%). The critical values of MAD and SCC-Ag in determining lymph node metastasis were 1.0 cm and 5.2 ng/mL, respectively. The accuracy, specificity, and Youden index of MAD ≥1.0 cm combined with SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL for evaluating lymph node metastasis were 75.71%, 100%, and 0.59, respectively, and were significantly different from the values for the MAD ≥1.0 cm (72.09%, 80.56%, and 0.47, respectively) and SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL (71.43%, 68.97%, and 0.42, respectively) groups. Correlation analysis showed that non-squamous cell carcinoma, pelvic lymph node (PLN) MAD ≥1.0 cm plus number ≥ 2, and 1 PLN MAD ≥1.0 cm with CILN and/or PALN MAD 0.5–1.0 cm were risk factors for CILN and/or PALN metastasis. CONCLUSION: Patients with MAD ≥1.0 cm and SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL, as well as high risk factors for CILN and/or PALN metastasis, should undergo resection of enlarged lymph nodes below the common iliac gland and lymphadenectomy of CILN/PALN to reduce tumor burden and to clarify lymph node metastasis status for accurate guidance in follow-up treatment. Patients with MAD < 1.0 cm and SCC-Ag < 5.2 ng/mL may be treated with chemoradiotherapy directly based on imaging, given the low lymph node metastasis rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8088051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80880512021-05-03 Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer Li, Wei Xiong, Li Zhu, Qiaoling Lu, Hong Zhong, Meiling Liang, Meirong Jiang, Wei Wang, Yanan Cheng, Wei BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is still a problem. This study aimed to explore the choice of these assessment methods. METHODS: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was performed in 96 patients with advanced cervical cancer. The positive rates of lymph node metastasis were analyzed. The values of computed tomography lymph node minimum axial diameter (MAD) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), and their combination in predicting retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis were compared. High-risk factors for common iliac lymph node (CILN) and/or para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis were analyzed. RESULTS: The lymph node metastasis rate was 62.50% and the CILN and/or PALN metastasis rate was 31.25%. Overall, 96 patients had 172 visible lymph nodes. The positive rate of lymph node metastasis was significantly higher in the MAD ≥1.0 cm group (83.33%) than in the 0.5 cm ≤ MAD < 1.0 cm group (26.82%). The critical values of MAD and SCC-Ag in determining lymph node metastasis were 1.0 cm and 5.2 ng/mL, respectively. The accuracy, specificity, and Youden index of MAD ≥1.0 cm combined with SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL for evaluating lymph node metastasis were 75.71%, 100%, and 0.59, respectively, and were significantly different from the values for the MAD ≥1.0 cm (72.09%, 80.56%, and 0.47, respectively) and SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL (71.43%, 68.97%, and 0.42, respectively) groups. Correlation analysis showed that non-squamous cell carcinoma, pelvic lymph node (PLN) MAD ≥1.0 cm plus number ≥ 2, and 1 PLN MAD ≥1.0 cm with CILN and/or PALN MAD 0.5–1.0 cm were risk factors for CILN and/or PALN metastasis. CONCLUSION: Patients with MAD ≥1.0 cm and SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL, as well as high risk factors for CILN and/or PALN metastasis, should undergo resection of enlarged lymph nodes below the common iliac gland and lymphadenectomy of CILN/PALN to reduce tumor burden and to clarify lymph node metastasis status for accurate guidance in follow-up treatment. Patients with MAD < 1.0 cm and SCC-Ag < 5.2 ng/mL may be treated with chemoradiotherapy directly based on imaging, given the low lymph node metastasis rate. BioMed Central 2021-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8088051/ /pubmed/33933005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08208-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Wei Xiong, Li Zhu, Qiaoling Lu, Hong Zhong, Meiling Liang, Meirong Jiang, Wei Wang, Yanan Cheng, Wei Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer |
title | Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer |
title_full | Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer |
title_fullStr | Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer |
title_short | Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer |
title_sort | assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33933005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08208-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liwei assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT xiongli assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT zhuqiaoling assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT luhong assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT zhongmeiling assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT liangmeirong assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT jiangwei assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT wangyanan assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT chengwei assessmentofretroperitoneallymphnodestatusinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer |