Cargando…
McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in women requiring a prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
BACKGROUND: Preterm birth (PTB) is the leading cause of death in children under five years. Spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) is the major cause of preterm delivery. The key risk factors for SPTB are women who have a short cervix and women who have had previous preterm birth. Cervical cerclage has be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01679-5 |
_version_ | 1783686780515516416 |
---|---|
author | Issah, Ashad Diacci, Rosanna Williams, Kimberley P. Aubin, Anne-Marie McAuliffe, Liam Phung, Jason Wang, Carol Maouris, Panos Pennell, Craig E. |
author_facet | Issah, Ashad Diacci, Rosanna Williams, Kimberley P. Aubin, Anne-Marie McAuliffe, Liam Phung, Jason Wang, Carol Maouris, Panos Pennell, Craig E. |
author_sort | Issah, Ashad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Preterm birth (PTB) is the leading cause of death in children under five years. Spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) is the major cause of preterm delivery. The key risk factors for SPTB are women who have a short cervix and women who have had previous preterm birth. Cervical cerclage has been used for several decades and has shown to decrease rates of preterm birth. The most commonly used cerclage techniques were described by Shirodkar and McDonald, with no current consensus on the preferred technique. The objective of this review is to determine and compare the effectiveness of both techniques. METHODS: Studies will be sourced from six electronic databases, as well as from experts in the field, reference lists, and grey literature. Eligible studies will include pregnant women, with a singleton or twin pregnancy, requiring a cervical cerclage, using either the Shirodkar or McDonald technique and run comparative analyses between the two techniques. Randomized control trials (RCT)s, non-randomized control trials, and cohort studies will be eligible. Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening at abstract and full-text level, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Discrepancies will be resolved by a consensus third reviewer if required. Fixed-effects or random-effects models will be used where appropriate to synthesize results. Alternative synthesis methods will be investigated in instances where a meta-analysis is not appropriate, such as summarizing effect estimates, combining P values, vote counting based on direction of effect, or synthesis in narrative form. DISCUSSION: This review will synthesize the evidence on both the Shirodkar and McDonald cerclage method, and will help clinicians and health services to determine and deliver best practice antenatal care that has the potential to make an impact on preterm birth. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO on 25 of May, 2020 with registration number CRD42020177386 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8088063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80880632021-05-03 McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in women requiring a prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol Issah, Ashad Diacci, Rosanna Williams, Kimberley P. Aubin, Anne-Marie McAuliffe, Liam Phung, Jason Wang, Carol Maouris, Panos Pennell, Craig E. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Preterm birth (PTB) is the leading cause of death in children under five years. Spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) is the major cause of preterm delivery. The key risk factors for SPTB are women who have a short cervix and women who have had previous preterm birth. Cervical cerclage has been used for several decades and has shown to decrease rates of preterm birth. The most commonly used cerclage techniques were described by Shirodkar and McDonald, with no current consensus on the preferred technique. The objective of this review is to determine and compare the effectiveness of both techniques. METHODS: Studies will be sourced from six electronic databases, as well as from experts in the field, reference lists, and grey literature. Eligible studies will include pregnant women, with a singleton or twin pregnancy, requiring a cervical cerclage, using either the Shirodkar or McDonald technique and run comparative analyses between the two techniques. Randomized control trials (RCT)s, non-randomized control trials, and cohort studies will be eligible. Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening at abstract and full-text level, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Discrepancies will be resolved by a consensus third reviewer if required. Fixed-effects or random-effects models will be used where appropriate to synthesize results. Alternative synthesis methods will be investigated in instances where a meta-analysis is not appropriate, such as summarizing effect estimates, combining P values, vote counting based on direction of effect, or synthesis in narrative form. DISCUSSION: This review will synthesize the evidence on both the Shirodkar and McDonald cerclage method, and will help clinicians and health services to determine and deliver best practice antenatal care that has the potential to make an impact on preterm birth. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO on 25 of May, 2020 with registration number CRD42020177386 BioMed Central 2021-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8088063/ /pubmed/33931124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01679-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Issah, Ashad Diacci, Rosanna Williams, Kimberley P. Aubin, Anne-Marie McAuliffe, Liam Phung, Jason Wang, Carol Maouris, Panos Pennell, Craig E. McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in women requiring a prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title | McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in women requiring a prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_full | McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in women requiring a prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_fullStr | McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in women requiring a prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in women requiring a prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_short | McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in women requiring a prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_sort | mcdonald versus shirodkar cerclage technique in women requiring a prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01679-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT issahashad mcdonaldversusshirodkarcerclagetechniqueinwomenrequiringaprophylacticcerclageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT diaccirosanna mcdonaldversusshirodkarcerclagetechniqueinwomenrequiringaprophylacticcerclageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT williamskimberleyp mcdonaldversusshirodkarcerclagetechniqueinwomenrequiringaprophylacticcerclageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT aubinannemarie mcdonaldversusshirodkarcerclagetechniqueinwomenrequiringaprophylacticcerclageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT mcauliffeliam mcdonaldversusshirodkarcerclagetechniqueinwomenrequiringaprophylacticcerclageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT phungjason mcdonaldversusshirodkarcerclagetechniqueinwomenrequiringaprophylacticcerclageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT wangcarol mcdonaldversusshirodkarcerclagetechniqueinwomenrequiringaprophylacticcerclageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT maourispanos mcdonaldversusshirodkarcerclagetechniqueinwomenrequiringaprophylacticcerclageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT pennellcraige mcdonaldversusshirodkarcerclagetechniqueinwomenrequiringaprophylacticcerclageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol |