Cargando…

Commissioner, clinician, and patient experiences of a pre‐surgical health optimisation programme – a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Health optimisation programmes are an increasingly popular policy intervention that aim to support patients to lose weight or stop smoking ahead of surgery. There is little evidence about their impact and the experience of their use. The aim of this study was to investigate the experienc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLaughlin, Joanna, Palmer, Cecily, Redwood, Sabi, Kipping, Ruth, Owens, Lucie, Reynolds, Rebecca, Scott, Lauren J, Hill, Elizabeth M, Donovan, Jenny L, Jago, Russell, Owen-Smith, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33933095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06434-z
_version_ 1783686802232573952
author McLaughlin, Joanna
Palmer, Cecily
Redwood, Sabi
Kipping, Ruth
Owens, Lucie
Reynolds, Rebecca
Scott, Lauren J
Hill, Elizabeth M
Donovan, Jenny L
Jago, Russell
Owen-Smith, Amanda
author_facet McLaughlin, Joanna
Palmer, Cecily
Redwood, Sabi
Kipping, Ruth
Owens, Lucie
Reynolds, Rebecca
Scott, Lauren J
Hill, Elizabeth M
Donovan, Jenny L
Jago, Russell
Owen-Smith, Amanda
author_sort McLaughlin, Joanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health optimisation programmes are an increasingly popular policy intervention that aim to support patients to lose weight or stop smoking ahead of surgery. There is little evidence about their impact and the experience of their use. The aim of this study was to investigate the experiences and perspectives of commissioners, clinicians and patients involved in a locality’s health optimisation programme in the United Kingdom. The programme alters access to elective orthopaedic surgery for patients who smoke or are obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2)), diverting them to a 12-week programme of behavioural change interventions prior to assessment for surgical referral. METHODS: A thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews (n = 20) with National Health Service and Local Authority commissioners and planners, healthcare professionals, and patients using the pathway. RESULTS: Health optimisation was broadly acceptable to professionals and patients in our sample and offered a chance to trigger both short term pre-surgical weight loss/smoking cessation and longer-term sustained changes to lifestyle intentions post-surgery. Communicating the nature and purpose of the programme to patients was challenging and consequently the quality of the explanation received and understanding gained by patients was generally low. Insight into the successful implementation of health optimisation for the hip and knee pathway, but failure in roll-out to other surgical specialities, suggests placement of health optimisation interventions into the ‘usual waiting time’ for surgical referral may be of greatest acceptability to professionals and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and professionals supported the continuation of health optimisation in this context and recognised likely health and wellbeing benefits for a majority of patients. However, the clinicians’ communication to patients about health optimisation needs to improve to prepare patients and optimise their engagement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8088197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80881972021-05-03 Commissioner, clinician, and patient experiences of a pre‐surgical health optimisation programme – a qualitative study McLaughlin, Joanna Palmer, Cecily Redwood, Sabi Kipping, Ruth Owens, Lucie Reynolds, Rebecca Scott, Lauren J Hill, Elizabeth M Donovan, Jenny L Jago, Russell Owen-Smith, Amanda BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Health optimisation programmes are an increasingly popular policy intervention that aim to support patients to lose weight or stop smoking ahead of surgery. There is little evidence about their impact and the experience of their use. The aim of this study was to investigate the experiences and perspectives of commissioners, clinicians and patients involved in a locality’s health optimisation programme in the United Kingdom. The programme alters access to elective orthopaedic surgery for patients who smoke or are obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2)), diverting them to a 12-week programme of behavioural change interventions prior to assessment for surgical referral. METHODS: A thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews (n = 20) with National Health Service and Local Authority commissioners and planners, healthcare professionals, and patients using the pathway. RESULTS: Health optimisation was broadly acceptable to professionals and patients in our sample and offered a chance to trigger both short term pre-surgical weight loss/smoking cessation and longer-term sustained changes to lifestyle intentions post-surgery. Communicating the nature and purpose of the programme to patients was challenging and consequently the quality of the explanation received and understanding gained by patients was generally low. Insight into the successful implementation of health optimisation for the hip and knee pathway, but failure in roll-out to other surgical specialities, suggests placement of health optimisation interventions into the ‘usual waiting time’ for surgical referral may be of greatest acceptability to professionals and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and professionals supported the continuation of health optimisation in this context and recognised likely health and wellbeing benefits for a majority of patients. However, the clinicians’ communication to patients about health optimisation needs to improve to prepare patients and optimise their engagement. BioMed Central 2021-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8088197/ /pubmed/33933095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06434-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
McLaughlin, Joanna
Palmer, Cecily
Redwood, Sabi
Kipping, Ruth
Owens, Lucie
Reynolds, Rebecca
Scott, Lauren J
Hill, Elizabeth M
Donovan, Jenny L
Jago, Russell
Owen-Smith, Amanda
Commissioner, clinician, and patient experiences of a pre‐surgical health optimisation programme – a qualitative study
title Commissioner, clinician, and patient experiences of a pre‐surgical health optimisation programme – a qualitative study
title_full Commissioner, clinician, and patient experiences of a pre‐surgical health optimisation programme – a qualitative study
title_fullStr Commissioner, clinician, and patient experiences of a pre‐surgical health optimisation programme – a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Commissioner, clinician, and patient experiences of a pre‐surgical health optimisation programme – a qualitative study
title_short Commissioner, clinician, and patient experiences of a pre‐surgical health optimisation programme – a qualitative study
title_sort commissioner, clinician, and patient experiences of a pre‐surgical health optimisation programme – a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33933095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06434-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mclaughlinjoanna commissionerclinicianandpatientexperiencesofapresurgicalhealthoptimisationprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT palmercecily commissionerclinicianandpatientexperiencesofapresurgicalhealthoptimisationprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT redwoodsabi commissionerclinicianandpatientexperiencesofapresurgicalhealthoptimisationprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT kippingruth commissionerclinicianandpatientexperiencesofapresurgicalhealthoptimisationprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT owenslucie commissionerclinicianandpatientexperiencesofapresurgicalhealthoptimisationprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT reynoldsrebecca commissionerclinicianandpatientexperiencesofapresurgicalhealthoptimisationprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT scottlaurenj commissionerclinicianandpatientexperiencesofapresurgicalhealthoptimisationprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT hillelizabethm commissionerclinicianandpatientexperiencesofapresurgicalhealthoptimisationprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT donovanjennyl commissionerclinicianandpatientexperiencesofapresurgicalhealthoptimisationprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT jagorussell commissionerclinicianandpatientexperiencesofapresurgicalhealthoptimisationprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT owensmithamanda commissionerclinicianandpatientexperiencesofapresurgicalhealthoptimisationprogrammeaqualitativestudy