Cargando…

The global prevalence of fusidic acid resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most common pathogens causing nosocomial and community-acquired infections with high morbidity and mortality rates. Fusidic acid has been increasingly used for the treatment of infections due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hajikhani, Bahareh, Goudarzi, Mehdi, Kakavandi, Sareh, Amini, Sana, Zamani, Samira, van Belkum, Alex, Goudarzi, Hossein, Dadashi, Masoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33933162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00943-6
_version_ 1783686901431009280
author Hajikhani, Bahareh
Goudarzi, Mehdi
Kakavandi, Sareh
Amini, Sana
Zamani, Samira
van Belkum, Alex
Goudarzi, Hossein
Dadashi, Masoud
author_facet Hajikhani, Bahareh
Goudarzi, Mehdi
Kakavandi, Sareh
Amini, Sana
Zamani, Samira
van Belkum, Alex
Goudarzi, Hossein
Dadashi, Masoud
author_sort Hajikhani, Bahareh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most common pathogens causing nosocomial and community-acquired infections with high morbidity and mortality rates. Fusidic acid has been increasingly used for the treatment of infections due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The present study aimed to determine the precise prevalence of fusidic acid resistant MRSA (FRMRSA), fusidic acid resistant MSSA (FRMSSA), and total fusidic acid resistant S. aureus (FRSA) on a global scale. METHODS: Several international databases including Medline, Embase, and the Web of Sciences were searched (2000–2020) to discern studies addressing the prevalence of FRSA, FRMRSA, and FRMSSA. STATA (version14) software was used to interpret the data. RESULTS: Of the 1446 records identified from the databases, 215 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria for the detection of FRSA (208 studies), FRMRSA (143 studies), and FRMSSA (71 studies). The analyses manifested that the global prevalence of FRSA, FRMRSA, and FRMSSA was 0.5%, 2.6% and 6.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis describes an increasing incidence of FRSA, FRMSSA, and FRMRSA. These results indicate the need for prudent prescription of fusidic acid to stop or diminish the incidence of fusidic acid resistance as well as the development of strategies for monitoring the efficacy of fusidic acid use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-00943-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8088720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80887202021-05-04 The global prevalence of fusidic acid resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hajikhani, Bahareh Goudarzi, Mehdi Kakavandi, Sareh Amini, Sana Zamani, Samira van Belkum, Alex Goudarzi, Hossein Dadashi, Masoud Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Review BACKGROUND AND AIM: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most common pathogens causing nosocomial and community-acquired infections with high morbidity and mortality rates. Fusidic acid has been increasingly used for the treatment of infections due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The present study aimed to determine the precise prevalence of fusidic acid resistant MRSA (FRMRSA), fusidic acid resistant MSSA (FRMSSA), and total fusidic acid resistant S. aureus (FRSA) on a global scale. METHODS: Several international databases including Medline, Embase, and the Web of Sciences were searched (2000–2020) to discern studies addressing the prevalence of FRSA, FRMRSA, and FRMSSA. STATA (version14) software was used to interpret the data. RESULTS: Of the 1446 records identified from the databases, 215 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria for the detection of FRSA (208 studies), FRMRSA (143 studies), and FRMSSA (71 studies). The analyses manifested that the global prevalence of FRSA, FRMRSA, and FRMSSA was 0.5%, 2.6% and 6.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis describes an increasing incidence of FRSA, FRMSSA, and FRMRSA. These results indicate the need for prudent prescription of fusidic acid to stop or diminish the incidence of fusidic acid resistance as well as the development of strategies for monitoring the efficacy of fusidic acid use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-00943-6. BioMed Central 2021-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8088720/ /pubmed/33933162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00943-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Hajikhani, Bahareh
Goudarzi, Mehdi
Kakavandi, Sareh
Amini, Sana
Zamani, Samira
van Belkum, Alex
Goudarzi, Hossein
Dadashi, Masoud
The global prevalence of fusidic acid resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The global prevalence of fusidic acid resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The global prevalence of fusidic acid resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The global prevalence of fusidic acid resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The global prevalence of fusidic acid resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The global prevalence of fusidic acid resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort global prevalence of fusidic acid resistance in clinical isolates of staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33933162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00943-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hajikhanibahareh theglobalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT goudarzimehdi theglobalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kakavandisareh theglobalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aminisana theglobalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zamanisamira theglobalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanbelkumalex theglobalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT goudarzihossein theglobalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dadashimasoud theglobalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hajikhanibahareh globalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT goudarzimehdi globalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kakavandisareh globalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aminisana globalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zamanisamira globalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanbelkumalex globalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT goudarzihossein globalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dadashimasoud globalprevalenceoffusidicacidresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis