Cargando…

A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Although clinical trials have investigated the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for non‐small cell lung cancer, none have investigated the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 71 NSCLC patients including 33 treated with pembro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isono, Taisuke, Kagiyama, Naho, Shibata, Shun, Nakajima, Hitomi, Matsui, Yuma, Takano, Kenji, Nishida, Takashi, Hosoda, Chiaki, Kawate, Eriko, Kobayashi, Yoichi, Ishiguro, Takashi, Takaku, Yotaro, Kurashima, Kazuyoshi, Yanagisawa, Tsutomu, Takayanagi, Noboru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33710764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13915
_version_ 1783686941180428288
author Isono, Taisuke
Kagiyama, Naho
Shibata, Shun
Nakajima, Hitomi
Matsui, Yuma
Takano, Kenji
Nishida, Takashi
Hosoda, Chiaki
Kawate, Eriko
Kobayashi, Yoichi
Ishiguro, Takashi
Takaku, Yotaro
Kurashima, Kazuyoshi
Yanagisawa, Tsutomu
Takayanagi, Noboru
author_facet Isono, Taisuke
Kagiyama, Naho
Shibata, Shun
Nakajima, Hitomi
Matsui, Yuma
Takano, Kenji
Nishida, Takashi
Hosoda, Chiaki
Kawate, Eriko
Kobayashi, Yoichi
Ishiguro, Takashi
Takaku, Yotaro
Kurashima, Kazuyoshi
Yanagisawa, Tsutomu
Takayanagi, Noboru
author_sort Isono, Taisuke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although clinical trials have investigated the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for non‐small cell lung cancer, none have investigated the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 71 NSCLC patients including 33 treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (combination therapy group) and 38 treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy (monotherapy group) from 1 May 2016 to 31 August 2020. RESULTS: Eleven of 33 (33.3%) patients in the combination therapy group and 37 of 38 (97.4%) patients in the monotherapy group had programmed cell death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. Objective response rate (ORR) and median overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between the combination therapy group and monotherapy group (54.5% vs. 47.4, p = 0.637 and 16.6 vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.463). In patients with PD‐L1 TPS ≥50%, ORR and median OS were not different between the combination therapy group and the monotherapy group (63.6% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.499 and not reached vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.976). Thirty‐three (100%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs) in the combination therapy group and 32 (84.2%) in the monotherapy group. Treatment discontinuation at 1 year due to AEs occurred more frequently in the combination therapy group (45.2%) than in the monotherapy group (21.1%). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in ORR and OS between the two groups, and treatment discontinuation was more frequent in the combination group. A randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab for first‐line treatment in patients with PD‐L1 TPS ≥50%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8088931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80889312021-05-10 A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer Isono, Taisuke Kagiyama, Naho Shibata, Shun Nakajima, Hitomi Matsui, Yuma Takano, Kenji Nishida, Takashi Hosoda, Chiaki Kawate, Eriko Kobayashi, Yoichi Ishiguro, Takashi Takaku, Yotaro Kurashima, Kazuyoshi Yanagisawa, Tsutomu Takayanagi, Noboru Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Although clinical trials have investigated the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for non‐small cell lung cancer, none have investigated the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 71 NSCLC patients including 33 treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (combination therapy group) and 38 treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy (monotherapy group) from 1 May 2016 to 31 August 2020. RESULTS: Eleven of 33 (33.3%) patients in the combination therapy group and 37 of 38 (97.4%) patients in the monotherapy group had programmed cell death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. Objective response rate (ORR) and median overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between the combination therapy group and monotherapy group (54.5% vs. 47.4, p = 0.637 and 16.6 vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.463). In patients with PD‐L1 TPS ≥50%, ORR and median OS were not different between the combination therapy group and the monotherapy group (63.6% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.499 and not reached vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.976). Thirty‐three (100%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs) in the combination therapy group and 32 (84.2%) in the monotherapy group. Treatment discontinuation at 1 year due to AEs occurred more frequently in the combination therapy group (45.2%) than in the monotherapy group (21.1%). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in ORR and OS between the two groups, and treatment discontinuation was more frequent in the combination group. A randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab for first‐line treatment in patients with PD‐L1 TPS ≥50%. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-03-12 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8088931/ /pubmed/33710764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13915 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Isono, Taisuke
Kagiyama, Naho
Shibata, Shun
Nakajima, Hitomi
Matsui, Yuma
Takano, Kenji
Nishida, Takashi
Hosoda, Chiaki
Kawate, Eriko
Kobayashi, Yoichi
Ishiguro, Takashi
Takaku, Yotaro
Kurashima, Kazuyoshi
Yanagisawa, Tsutomu
Takayanagi, Noboru
A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
title A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
title_full A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
title_short A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
title_sort retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33710764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13915
work_keys_str_mv AT isonotaisuke aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kagiyamanaho aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT shibatashun aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nakajimahitomi aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT matsuiyuma aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT takanokenji aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nishidatakashi aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hosodachiaki aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kawateeriko aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kobayashiyoichi aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT ishigurotakashi aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT takakuyotaro aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kurashimakazuyoshi aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yanagisawatsutomu aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT takayanaginoboru aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT isonotaisuke retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kagiyamanaho retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT shibatashun retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nakajimahitomi retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT matsuiyuma retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT takanokenji retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nishidatakashi retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hosodachiaki retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kawateeriko retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kobayashiyoichi retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT ishigurotakashi retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT takakuyotaro retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kurashimakazuyoshi retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yanagisawatsutomu retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT takayanaginoboru retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer