Cargando…
A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
BACKGROUND: Although clinical trials have investigated the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for non‐small cell lung cancer, none have investigated the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 71 NSCLC patients including 33 treated with pembro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33710764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13915 |
_version_ | 1783686941180428288 |
---|---|
author | Isono, Taisuke Kagiyama, Naho Shibata, Shun Nakajima, Hitomi Matsui, Yuma Takano, Kenji Nishida, Takashi Hosoda, Chiaki Kawate, Eriko Kobayashi, Yoichi Ishiguro, Takashi Takaku, Yotaro Kurashima, Kazuyoshi Yanagisawa, Tsutomu Takayanagi, Noboru |
author_facet | Isono, Taisuke Kagiyama, Naho Shibata, Shun Nakajima, Hitomi Matsui, Yuma Takano, Kenji Nishida, Takashi Hosoda, Chiaki Kawate, Eriko Kobayashi, Yoichi Ishiguro, Takashi Takaku, Yotaro Kurashima, Kazuyoshi Yanagisawa, Tsutomu Takayanagi, Noboru |
author_sort | Isono, Taisuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although clinical trials have investigated the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for non‐small cell lung cancer, none have investigated the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 71 NSCLC patients including 33 treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (combination therapy group) and 38 treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy (monotherapy group) from 1 May 2016 to 31 August 2020. RESULTS: Eleven of 33 (33.3%) patients in the combination therapy group and 37 of 38 (97.4%) patients in the monotherapy group had programmed cell death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. Objective response rate (ORR) and median overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between the combination therapy group and monotherapy group (54.5% vs. 47.4, p = 0.637 and 16.6 vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.463). In patients with PD‐L1 TPS ≥50%, ORR and median OS were not different between the combination therapy group and the monotherapy group (63.6% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.499 and not reached vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.976). Thirty‐three (100%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs) in the combination therapy group and 32 (84.2%) in the monotherapy group. Treatment discontinuation at 1 year due to AEs occurred more frequently in the combination therapy group (45.2%) than in the monotherapy group (21.1%). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in ORR and OS between the two groups, and treatment discontinuation was more frequent in the combination group. A randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab for first‐line treatment in patients with PD‐L1 TPS ≥50%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8088931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80889312021-05-10 A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer Isono, Taisuke Kagiyama, Naho Shibata, Shun Nakajima, Hitomi Matsui, Yuma Takano, Kenji Nishida, Takashi Hosoda, Chiaki Kawate, Eriko Kobayashi, Yoichi Ishiguro, Takashi Takaku, Yotaro Kurashima, Kazuyoshi Yanagisawa, Tsutomu Takayanagi, Noboru Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Although clinical trials have investigated the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for non‐small cell lung cancer, none have investigated the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 71 NSCLC patients including 33 treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (combination therapy group) and 38 treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy (monotherapy group) from 1 May 2016 to 31 August 2020. RESULTS: Eleven of 33 (33.3%) patients in the combination therapy group and 37 of 38 (97.4%) patients in the monotherapy group had programmed cell death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. Objective response rate (ORR) and median overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between the combination therapy group and monotherapy group (54.5% vs. 47.4, p = 0.637 and 16.6 vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.463). In patients with PD‐L1 TPS ≥50%, ORR and median OS were not different between the combination therapy group and the monotherapy group (63.6% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.499 and not reached vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.976). Thirty‐three (100%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs) in the combination therapy group and 32 (84.2%) in the monotherapy group. Treatment discontinuation at 1 year due to AEs occurred more frequently in the combination therapy group (45.2%) than in the monotherapy group (21.1%). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in ORR and OS between the two groups, and treatment discontinuation was more frequent in the combination group. A randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab for first‐line treatment in patients with PD‐L1 TPS ≥50%. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-03-12 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8088931/ /pubmed/33710764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13915 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Isono, Taisuke Kagiyama, Naho Shibata, Shun Nakajima, Hitomi Matsui, Yuma Takano, Kenji Nishida, Takashi Hosoda, Chiaki Kawate, Eriko Kobayashi, Yoichi Ishiguro, Takashi Takaku, Yotaro Kurashima, Kazuyoshi Yanagisawa, Tsutomu Takayanagi, Noboru A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer |
title | A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_full | A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_fullStr | A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_short | A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_sort | retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33710764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13915 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isonotaisuke aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT kagiyamanaho aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT shibatashun aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT nakajimahitomi aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT matsuiyuma aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT takanokenji aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT nishidatakashi aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT hosodachiaki aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT kawateeriko aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT kobayashiyoichi aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT ishigurotakashi aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT takakuyotaro aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT kurashimakazuyoshi aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT yanagisawatsutomu aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT takayanaginoboru aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT isonotaisuke retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT kagiyamanaho retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT shibatashun retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT nakajimahitomi retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT matsuiyuma retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT takanokenji retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT nishidatakashi retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT hosodachiaki retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT kawateeriko retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT kobayashiyoichi retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT ishigurotakashi retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT takakuyotaro retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT kurashimakazuyoshi retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT yanagisawatsutomu retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer AT takayanaginoboru retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer |