Cargando…
Learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy for pulmonary neoplasms: A prospective observational study
BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy with four arms (RPL‐4) in patients with pulmonary neoplasms using prospectively collected data. METHODS: Data from 100 consecutive cases with lung neoplasms undergoing RPL‐4 were prospectively accumulated into a database bet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33709571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13927 |
_version_ | 1783686950291505152 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Mu‐Zi Lai, Ren‐Chun Abbas, Abbas E. Park, Bernard J. Li, Ji‐Bin Yang, Jie Wu, Jin‐Chun Wang, Gang Yang, Hao‐Xian |
author_facet | Yang, Mu‐Zi Lai, Ren‐Chun Abbas, Abbas E. Park, Bernard J. Li, Ji‐Bin Yang, Jie Wu, Jin‐Chun Wang, Gang Yang, Hao‐Xian |
author_sort | Yang, Mu‐Zi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy with four arms (RPL‐4) in patients with pulmonary neoplasms using prospectively collected data. METHODS: Data from 100 consecutive cases with lung neoplasms undergoing RPL‐4 were prospectively accumulated into a database between June 2018 and August 2019. The Da Vinci Si system was used to perform RPL‐4. Regression curves of cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) and risk‐adjusted CUSUM (RA‐CUSUM) were fit to identify different phases of the learning curve. Clinical indicators and patient characteristics were compared between different phases. RESULTS: The mean operative time, console time, and docking time for the entire cohort were 130.6 ± 53.8, 95.5 ± 52.3, and 6.4 ± 3.0 min, respectively. Based on CUSUM analysis of console time, the surgical experience can be divided into three different phases: 1–10 cases (learning phase), 11–51 cases (plateau phase), and >51 cases (mastery phase). RA‐CUSUM analysis revealed that experience based on 56 cases was required to truly master this technique. Total operative time (p < 0.001), console time (p < 0.001), and docking time (p = 0.026) were reduced as experience increased. However, other indicators were not significantly different among these three phases. CONCLUSIONS: The RPL‐4 learning curve can be divided into three phases. Ten cases were required to pass the learning curve, but the mastery of RPL‐4 for satisfactory surgical outcomes requires experience with at least 56 cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8088972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80889722021-05-10 Learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy for pulmonary neoplasms: A prospective observational study Yang, Mu‐Zi Lai, Ren‐Chun Abbas, Abbas E. Park, Bernard J. Li, Ji‐Bin Yang, Jie Wu, Jin‐Chun Wang, Gang Yang, Hao‐Xian Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy with four arms (RPL‐4) in patients with pulmonary neoplasms using prospectively collected data. METHODS: Data from 100 consecutive cases with lung neoplasms undergoing RPL‐4 were prospectively accumulated into a database between June 2018 and August 2019. The Da Vinci Si system was used to perform RPL‐4. Regression curves of cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) and risk‐adjusted CUSUM (RA‐CUSUM) were fit to identify different phases of the learning curve. Clinical indicators and patient characteristics were compared between different phases. RESULTS: The mean operative time, console time, and docking time for the entire cohort were 130.6 ± 53.8, 95.5 ± 52.3, and 6.4 ± 3.0 min, respectively. Based on CUSUM analysis of console time, the surgical experience can be divided into three different phases: 1–10 cases (learning phase), 11–51 cases (plateau phase), and >51 cases (mastery phase). RA‐CUSUM analysis revealed that experience based on 56 cases was required to truly master this technique. Total operative time (p < 0.001), console time (p < 0.001), and docking time (p = 0.026) were reduced as experience increased. However, other indicators were not significantly different among these three phases. CONCLUSIONS: The RPL‐4 learning curve can be divided into three phases. Ten cases were required to pass the learning curve, but the mastery of RPL‐4 for satisfactory surgical outcomes requires experience with at least 56 cases. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-03-11 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8088972/ /pubmed/33709571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13927 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Yang, Mu‐Zi Lai, Ren‐Chun Abbas, Abbas E. Park, Bernard J. Li, Ji‐Bin Yang, Jie Wu, Jin‐Chun Wang, Gang Yang, Hao‐Xian Learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy for pulmonary neoplasms: A prospective observational study |
title | Learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy for pulmonary neoplasms: A prospective observational study |
title_full | Learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy for pulmonary neoplasms: A prospective observational study |
title_fullStr | Learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy for pulmonary neoplasms: A prospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy for pulmonary neoplasms: A prospective observational study |
title_short | Learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy for pulmonary neoplasms: A prospective observational study |
title_sort | learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy for pulmonary neoplasms: a prospective observational study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33709571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangmuzi learningcurveofroboticportallobectomyforpulmonaryneoplasmsaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT lairenchun learningcurveofroboticportallobectomyforpulmonaryneoplasmsaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT abbasabbase learningcurveofroboticportallobectomyforpulmonaryneoplasmsaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT parkbernardj learningcurveofroboticportallobectomyforpulmonaryneoplasmsaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT lijibin learningcurveofroboticportallobectomyforpulmonaryneoplasmsaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT yangjie learningcurveofroboticportallobectomyforpulmonaryneoplasmsaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT wujinchun learningcurveofroboticportallobectomyforpulmonaryneoplasmsaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT wanggang learningcurveofroboticportallobectomyforpulmonaryneoplasmsaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT yanghaoxian learningcurveofroboticportallobectomyforpulmonaryneoplasmsaprospectiveobservationalstudy |