Cargando…

Predictive Markers of Bronchial Hyperreactivity in a Large Cohort of Young Adults With Cough Variant Asthma

Cough variant asthma (CVA), a common asthma phenotype characterized by nonproductive cough and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR), is usually detected by bronchial provocation tests (BPTs) which are time-consuming, expensive, and unsafe. The primary study objective was to provide proof of concept for t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malerba, Mario, Ragnoli, Beatrice, Azzolina, Danila, Montuschi, Paolo, Radaeli, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8089476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953671
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.630334
Descripción
Sumario:Cough variant asthma (CVA), a common asthma phenotype characterized by nonproductive cough and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR), is usually detected by bronchial provocation tests (BPTs) which are time-consuming, expensive, and unsafe. The primary study objective was to provide proof of concept for the use of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F(E)NO), eosinophil count percentage in induced sputum (sEOS%), forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF(25–75%)) % predicted value, and FEF(25–75%) z-scores as surrogate markers predicting BHR in young adults with suspected CVA; the secondary objective was to compare the diagnostic performance of the various techniques. Three hundred and ten subjects (median age 24 years) were included in a cross-sectional study. Subjects were characterized as BHR positive (POS) (n = 147) or BHR negative (NEG) (n = 163) according to methacholine BPT. Classification accuracies were expressed as areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC). Compared with BHR NEG, FEF(25–75%) % predicted value and FEF(25–75%) z-scores were lower in the BHR POS group (p < 0.001), whereas F(E)NO (p < 0.001) and sEOS% were higher (p < 0.001). AUC values for detecting BHR were as follows: F(E)NO, 0.98 (SD = 0.02); sEOS%, 0.98 (SD = 0.02); FEF(25–75%) % pred, 0.93 (SD = 0.05); FEF(25–75%) z scores, 0.92 (SD = 0.05). Optimal cutoff values (OCV) for BHR prediction were as follows: F(E)NO, 32.7 ppb (sensitivity = 0.93, specificity = 0.96), sEOS%, 3.80% (sensitivity = 0.94, specificity = 0.94), FEF(25–75%) % predicted value, 80.0% (sensitivity = 0.90, specificity = 0.87), and FEF(25–75%) z-score, −0.87 (sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.87). Non-invasive/semi-invasive airway inflammatory or small airway functional measures might be used as surrogate markers predicting BHR in young adults with suspected CVA.