Cargando…
Development of Intranasal Levothyroxine Powder Delivery for Hypothyroidism
Background: Hypothyroidism affects 3-5% of the general population with oral levothyroxine (LT4) being the predominant replacement therapy. However, significant proportion of hypothyroid patients are unable to absorb oral replacement leading to therapeutic failure and may require injectable thyroxine...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8089816/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab048.1689 |
Sumario: | Background: Hypothyroidism affects 3-5% of the general population with oral levothyroxine (LT4) being the predominant replacement therapy. However, significant proportion of hypothyroid patients are unable to absorb oral replacement leading to therapeutic failure and may require injectable thyroxine. Objectives: To develop non-invasive, less costly, and patient-friendly LT4 nasal delivery alternative using mucoadhesive polymers: chitosan and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC). Methods: Six nasal LT4 formulations were developed with either chitosan or hydroxypropyl methylcellulose as mucoadhesive. The formulations were prepared through freeze-drying by varying the drug to polymer ratio (1:1, 1:3, and 1:5). The percentage drug yield was calculated by analyzing the weight of the formulation pre- and post-freeze drying. HPLC analysis was conducted to determine the amount of LT4 loaded in each formulation. Furthermore, the surface morphology, particle size, zeta potential, differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray diffraction as well as the in vitro release were assessed to determine the physicochemical properties and release characteristics of the formulations, respectively. Results: Both percentage drug loading and yield were > 70% for all the formulations. The freeze-dried formulations displayed a compact needle-like surface morphology. LT4-chitosan formulations, 1:1, 1:3, and 1:5 had mean particle size of 2.45 ± 0.88 µm, 2.76 ± 1.38 µm, and 1.59 ± 0.27 µm, respectively. Mean particle sizes for 1:1, 1:3, and 1:5 LT4-HPMC formulations were 0.56 ± 0.02 µm, 0.22 ± 0.06 µm, and 0.46 ± 0.04 µm. Zeta potential for LT4-chitosan formulation 1:1, 1:3, and 1:5 were -18.7 ± 1.00 mV, -16.2 ± 0.79 mV, and -19.17 ± 1.01 mV, respectively. LT4-HPMC 1:1, 1:3, and 1:5 formulations had zeta charges of -11.66 ± 3.16 mV, -6.06 ± 3.92 mV, and -9.53 ± 1.68 mV, respectively. Differential calorimetric analysis confirmed drug-polymer integration in all formulations, and X-ray powder diffraction showed both chitosan and HPMC formulations as crystalline configuration. The formulations with the highest in vitro release were LT4-HPMC 1:3 and LT4-chitosan 1:5. Conclusions: Results of this study suggest that both chitosan and HPMC can be used as sustained release polymers for the intranasal delivery of LT4. |
---|