Cargando…

Malignancy Risk in (18)F-FDG-Avid Thyroid Incidentalomas: Controversies and Limitations

Introduction: The prevalence of malignancy in thyroid incidentalomas (TI) discovered on (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT varies between 0% and 63.6%. The pooled malignancy rate according to three systematic reviews is 33-35%. The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines recommend that such nodules,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bukhari, Khulood, Haleem, Zarah, Munir, Kashif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8089983/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab048.1765
_version_ 1783687171861905408
author Bukhari, Khulood
Haleem, Zarah
Munir, Kashif
author_facet Bukhari, Khulood
Haleem, Zarah
Munir, Kashif
author_sort Bukhari, Khulood
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The prevalence of malignancy in thyroid incidentalomas (TI) discovered on (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT varies between 0% and 63.6%. The pooled malignancy rate according to three systematic reviews is 33-35%. The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines recommend that such nodules, when one centimeter or larger in size, should undergo further investigation with thyroid ultrasound (US) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. Objectives: The objective of our study was to determine the rate of malignancy amongst TI discovered incidentally on (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT, examine their clinicopathologic characteristics, and assess the usefulness of maximum standardized uptake values (SUV(max)) in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. Methods: We performed an electronic medical record search looking at all (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT reports during the study period of 12/01/2015 to 05/31/2019 that included the keyword ‘thyroid’ in the impression. Exclusion criteria included a history of thyroid disease or malignancy, known lesion(s) detected on previous clinical or radiological examinations and diffuse radiotracer uptake. Of the 476 reports reviewed, 136 cases were included in the study. Results: Common indications included initial staging or restaging of lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell, mantle-cell, T-cell types) (27.9%), lung adenocarcinoma (18.4%), head and neck cancer (16.9%) and breast cancer (11%). Fifty-eight (42.6%) patients had metabolically inactive lesions; five (8.6%) underwent further investigation with thyroid US and 3 subsequently with FNA (5%). All 3 had benign cytology. Seventy-seven (56.6%) patients had metabolically active lesions and 25 (32.5%) underwent imaging with thyroid US. Twelve (15.6%) had FNA; eight (66.7%) had benign cytology, two (16.7%) revealed atypia of undetermined significance and two (16.7%) were malignant. Biopsy for the two patients with malignant cytology showed follicular cell neoplasm of oncocytic hurtle cell type, and invasive follicular carcinoma with focal insular and papillary features and extensive capsular and vascular invasion. The mean SUV(max) in malignant vs benign lesions was 9.05 and 6.41 respectively. Conclusion: The malignancy rate was 2.6% amongst all patients with (18)F-FDG-avid TI and 8% amongst patients with metabolically active lesions who were investigated with thyroid US+/- FNA. This is significantly lower than malignancy rates previously reported in the literature. The evident inhomogeneity in the literature is likely multifactorial and may be explained in part by a dissimilarity among studies, and an informed decision by some to avoid invasive testing in the context of poor prognosis from underlying non-thyroidal cancer. Research is needed to determine the cohort of patients who could potentially benefit from further evaluation and treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8089983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80899832021-05-06 Malignancy Risk in (18)F-FDG-Avid Thyroid Incidentalomas: Controversies and Limitations Bukhari, Khulood Haleem, Zarah Munir, Kashif J Endocr Soc Thyroid Introduction: The prevalence of malignancy in thyroid incidentalomas (TI) discovered on (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT varies between 0% and 63.6%. The pooled malignancy rate according to three systematic reviews is 33-35%. The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines recommend that such nodules, when one centimeter or larger in size, should undergo further investigation with thyroid ultrasound (US) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. Objectives: The objective of our study was to determine the rate of malignancy amongst TI discovered incidentally on (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT, examine their clinicopathologic characteristics, and assess the usefulness of maximum standardized uptake values (SUV(max)) in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. Methods: We performed an electronic medical record search looking at all (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT reports during the study period of 12/01/2015 to 05/31/2019 that included the keyword ‘thyroid’ in the impression. Exclusion criteria included a history of thyroid disease or malignancy, known lesion(s) detected on previous clinical or radiological examinations and diffuse radiotracer uptake. Of the 476 reports reviewed, 136 cases were included in the study. Results: Common indications included initial staging or restaging of lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell, mantle-cell, T-cell types) (27.9%), lung adenocarcinoma (18.4%), head and neck cancer (16.9%) and breast cancer (11%). Fifty-eight (42.6%) patients had metabolically inactive lesions; five (8.6%) underwent further investigation with thyroid US and 3 subsequently with FNA (5%). All 3 had benign cytology. Seventy-seven (56.6%) patients had metabolically active lesions and 25 (32.5%) underwent imaging with thyroid US. Twelve (15.6%) had FNA; eight (66.7%) had benign cytology, two (16.7%) revealed atypia of undetermined significance and two (16.7%) were malignant. Biopsy for the two patients with malignant cytology showed follicular cell neoplasm of oncocytic hurtle cell type, and invasive follicular carcinoma with focal insular and papillary features and extensive capsular and vascular invasion. The mean SUV(max) in malignant vs benign lesions was 9.05 and 6.41 respectively. Conclusion: The malignancy rate was 2.6% amongst all patients with (18)F-FDG-avid TI and 8% amongst patients with metabolically active lesions who were investigated with thyroid US+/- FNA. This is significantly lower than malignancy rates previously reported in the literature. The evident inhomogeneity in the literature is likely multifactorial and may be explained in part by a dissimilarity among studies, and an informed decision by some to avoid invasive testing in the context of poor prognosis from underlying non-thyroidal cancer. Research is needed to determine the cohort of patients who could potentially benefit from further evaluation and treatment. Oxford University Press 2021-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8089983/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab048.1765 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Thyroid
Bukhari, Khulood
Haleem, Zarah
Munir, Kashif
Malignancy Risk in (18)F-FDG-Avid Thyroid Incidentalomas: Controversies and Limitations
title Malignancy Risk in (18)F-FDG-Avid Thyroid Incidentalomas: Controversies and Limitations
title_full Malignancy Risk in (18)F-FDG-Avid Thyroid Incidentalomas: Controversies and Limitations
title_fullStr Malignancy Risk in (18)F-FDG-Avid Thyroid Incidentalomas: Controversies and Limitations
title_full_unstemmed Malignancy Risk in (18)F-FDG-Avid Thyroid Incidentalomas: Controversies and Limitations
title_short Malignancy Risk in (18)F-FDG-Avid Thyroid Incidentalomas: Controversies and Limitations
title_sort malignancy risk in (18)f-fdg-avid thyroid incidentalomas: controversies and limitations
topic Thyroid
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8089983/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab048.1765
work_keys_str_mv AT bukharikhulood malignancyriskin18ffdgavidthyroidincidentalomascontroversiesandlimitations
AT haleemzarah malignancyriskin18ffdgavidthyroidincidentalomascontroversiesandlimitations
AT munirkashif malignancyriskin18ffdgavidthyroidincidentalomascontroversiesandlimitations