Cargando…

Test–retest reliability of approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making during functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults

Neural and behavioral mechanisms during approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making are relevant across various psychiatric disorders, particularly anxiety disorders. Studies using approach‐avoidance conflict paradigms in healthy adults have identified preliminary neural mechanisms, but findings mus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McDermott, Timothy J., Kirlic, Namik, Akeman, Elisabeth, Touthang, James, Clausen, Ashley N., Kuplicki, Rayus, Aupperle, Robin L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8090786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33650761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25371
_version_ 1783687367024967680
author McDermott, Timothy J.
Kirlic, Namik
Akeman, Elisabeth
Touthang, James
Clausen, Ashley N.
Kuplicki, Rayus
Aupperle, Robin L.
author_facet McDermott, Timothy J.
Kirlic, Namik
Akeman, Elisabeth
Touthang, James
Clausen, Ashley N.
Kuplicki, Rayus
Aupperle, Robin L.
author_sort McDermott, Timothy J.
collection PubMed
description Neural and behavioral mechanisms during approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making are relevant across various psychiatric disorders, particularly anxiety disorders. Studies using approach‐avoidance conflict paradigms in healthy adults have identified preliminary neural mechanisms, but findings must be replicated and demonstrated as reliable before further application. This study sought to replicate previous findings and examine test–retest reliability of behavioral (approach behavior, reaction time) and neural (regions of interest [ROIs]) responses during an approach‐avoidance conflict task conducted during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Thirty healthy adults completed an approach‐avoidance conflict task during fMRI on two occasions (mean interval: 17 days; range: 11–32). Effects of task condition during three task phases (decision‐making, affective outcome and monetary reward) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated across time points. Results replicated that approach behavior was modulated by conflict during decision‐making. ROI activations were replicated such that dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) was modulated by conflict during decision‐making, and dACC, striatum, and anterior insula were modulated by valence during affective outcomes (p's <.0083). Approach behavior during conflict demonstrated excellent reliability (ICCs ≥.77). Activation of dACC during conflict decision‐making and anterior insula during negative outcomes demonstrated fair reliability (ICCs = .51 and .54), and dACC and striatum activation demonstrated good reliability during negative outcomes (ICCs = .63 and .69). Two additional ROIs (amygdala, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) showed good reliability during negative outcomes (ICCs ≥.60). These results characterize several specific behavioral and neuroimaging responses that are replicable and sufficiently reliable during approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making to support future utility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8090786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80907862021-05-10 Test–retest reliability of approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making during functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults McDermott, Timothy J. Kirlic, Namik Akeman, Elisabeth Touthang, James Clausen, Ashley N. Kuplicki, Rayus Aupperle, Robin L. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Neural and behavioral mechanisms during approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making are relevant across various psychiatric disorders, particularly anxiety disorders. Studies using approach‐avoidance conflict paradigms in healthy adults have identified preliminary neural mechanisms, but findings must be replicated and demonstrated as reliable before further application. This study sought to replicate previous findings and examine test–retest reliability of behavioral (approach behavior, reaction time) and neural (regions of interest [ROIs]) responses during an approach‐avoidance conflict task conducted during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Thirty healthy adults completed an approach‐avoidance conflict task during fMRI on two occasions (mean interval: 17 days; range: 11–32). Effects of task condition during three task phases (decision‐making, affective outcome and monetary reward) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated across time points. Results replicated that approach behavior was modulated by conflict during decision‐making. ROI activations were replicated such that dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) was modulated by conflict during decision‐making, and dACC, striatum, and anterior insula were modulated by valence during affective outcomes (p's <.0083). Approach behavior during conflict demonstrated excellent reliability (ICCs ≥.77). Activation of dACC during conflict decision‐making and anterior insula during negative outcomes demonstrated fair reliability (ICCs = .51 and .54), and dACC and striatum activation demonstrated good reliability during negative outcomes (ICCs = .63 and .69). Two additional ROIs (amygdala, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) showed good reliability during negative outcomes (ICCs ≥.60). These results characterize several specific behavioral and neuroimaging responses that are replicable and sufficiently reliable during approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making to support future utility. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8090786/ /pubmed/33650761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25371 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
McDermott, Timothy J.
Kirlic, Namik
Akeman, Elisabeth
Touthang, James
Clausen, Ashley N.
Kuplicki, Rayus
Aupperle, Robin L.
Test–retest reliability of approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making during functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults
title Test–retest reliability of approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making during functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults
title_full Test–retest reliability of approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making during functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults
title_fullStr Test–retest reliability of approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making during functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults
title_full_unstemmed Test–retest reliability of approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making during functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults
title_short Test–retest reliability of approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making during functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults
title_sort test–retest reliability of approach‐avoidance conflict decision‐making during functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8090786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33650761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25371
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdermotttimothyj testretestreliabilityofapproachavoidanceconflictdecisionmakingduringfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaginginhealthyadults
AT kirlicnamik testretestreliabilityofapproachavoidanceconflictdecisionmakingduringfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaginginhealthyadults
AT akemanelisabeth testretestreliabilityofapproachavoidanceconflictdecisionmakingduringfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaginginhealthyadults
AT touthangjames testretestreliabilityofapproachavoidanceconflictdecisionmakingduringfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaginginhealthyadults
AT clausenashleyn testretestreliabilityofapproachavoidanceconflictdecisionmakingduringfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaginginhealthyadults
AT kuplickirayus testretestreliabilityofapproachavoidanceconflictdecisionmakingduringfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaginginhealthyadults
AT aupperlerobinl testretestreliabilityofapproachavoidanceconflictdecisionmakingduringfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaginginhealthyadults