Cargando…
Improving Quality of Carotid Interventions: Identifying Hospital-Level Structural Factors that can Improve Outcomes
BACKGROUND: “Structural factors” relating to organization of hospitals may affect procedural outcomes. This study's aim was to clarify associations between structural factors and outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid endarterectomy stenting (CAS). METHODS: A systematic review...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8090978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33227475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.066 |
_version_ | 1783687395016704000 |
---|---|
author | Gaba, Kamran Morris, Dylan Halliday, Alison Bulbulia, Richard Chana, Prem |
author_facet | Gaba, Kamran Morris, Dylan Halliday, Alison Bulbulia, Richard Chana, Prem |
author_sort | Gaba, Kamran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: “Structural factors” relating to organization of hospitals may affect procedural outcomes. This study's aim was to clarify associations between structural factors and outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid endarterectomy stenting (CAS). METHODS: A systematic review of studies published in English since 2005 was conducted. Structural factors assessed were as follows: population size served by the vascular department; number of hospital beds; availability of dedicated vascular beds; established clinical pathways; surgical intensive care unit (SICU) size; and specialty of surgeon/interventionalist. Primary outcomes were as follows: mortality; stroke; cardiac complications; length of hospital stay (LOS); and cost. RESULTS: There were 11 studies (n = 95,100 patients) included in this systematic review. For CEA, reduced mortality (P < 0.0001) and stroke rates (P = 0.001) were associated with vascular departments serving >75,000 people. Larger hospitals were associated with lower mortality, stroke rate, and cardiac events, compared with smaller hospitals (less than 130 beds). Provision of vascular beds after CEA was associated with lower mortality (P = 0.0008) and fewer cardiac events (P = 0.03). Adherence to established clinical pathways was associated with reduced stroke and cardiac event rates while reducing CEA costs. Large SICUs (≥7 beds) and dedicated intensivists were associated with decreased mortality after CEA while a large SICU was associated with reduced stroke rate (P = 0.001). Vascular surgeons performing CEA were associated with lower stroke rates and shorter LOS (P = 0.0001) than other specialists. CAS outcomes were not influenced by specialty but costless when performed by vascular surgeons (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Structural factors affect CEA outcomes, but data on CAS were limited. These findings may inform reconfiguration of vascular services, reducing risks and costs associated with carotid interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8090978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80909782021-05-13 Improving Quality of Carotid Interventions: Identifying Hospital-Level Structural Factors that can Improve Outcomes Gaba, Kamran Morris, Dylan Halliday, Alison Bulbulia, Richard Chana, Prem Ann Vasc Surg General Review BACKGROUND: “Structural factors” relating to organization of hospitals may affect procedural outcomes. This study's aim was to clarify associations between structural factors and outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid endarterectomy stenting (CAS). METHODS: A systematic review of studies published in English since 2005 was conducted. Structural factors assessed were as follows: population size served by the vascular department; number of hospital beds; availability of dedicated vascular beds; established clinical pathways; surgical intensive care unit (SICU) size; and specialty of surgeon/interventionalist. Primary outcomes were as follows: mortality; stroke; cardiac complications; length of hospital stay (LOS); and cost. RESULTS: There were 11 studies (n = 95,100 patients) included in this systematic review. For CEA, reduced mortality (P < 0.0001) and stroke rates (P = 0.001) were associated with vascular departments serving >75,000 people. Larger hospitals were associated with lower mortality, stroke rate, and cardiac events, compared with smaller hospitals (less than 130 beds). Provision of vascular beds after CEA was associated with lower mortality (P = 0.0008) and fewer cardiac events (P = 0.03). Adherence to established clinical pathways was associated with reduced stroke and cardiac event rates while reducing CEA costs. Large SICUs (≥7 beds) and dedicated intensivists were associated with decreased mortality after CEA while a large SICU was associated with reduced stroke rate (P = 0.001). Vascular surgeons performing CEA were associated with lower stroke rates and shorter LOS (P = 0.0001) than other specialists. CAS outcomes were not influenced by specialty but costless when performed by vascular surgeons (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Structural factors affect CEA outcomes, but data on CAS were limited. These findings may inform reconfiguration of vascular services, reducing risks and costs associated with carotid interventions. Elsevier 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8090978/ /pubmed/33227475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.066 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | General Review Gaba, Kamran Morris, Dylan Halliday, Alison Bulbulia, Richard Chana, Prem Improving Quality of Carotid Interventions: Identifying Hospital-Level Structural Factors that can Improve Outcomes |
title | Improving Quality of Carotid Interventions: Identifying Hospital-Level Structural Factors that can Improve Outcomes |
title_full | Improving Quality of Carotid Interventions: Identifying Hospital-Level Structural Factors that can Improve Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Improving Quality of Carotid Interventions: Identifying Hospital-Level Structural Factors that can Improve Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving Quality of Carotid Interventions: Identifying Hospital-Level Structural Factors that can Improve Outcomes |
title_short | Improving Quality of Carotid Interventions: Identifying Hospital-Level Structural Factors that can Improve Outcomes |
title_sort | improving quality of carotid interventions: identifying hospital-level structural factors that can improve outcomes |
topic | General Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8090978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33227475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.066 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gabakamran improvingqualityofcarotidinterventionsidentifyinghospitallevelstructuralfactorsthatcanimproveoutcomes AT morrisdylan improvingqualityofcarotidinterventionsidentifyinghospitallevelstructuralfactorsthatcanimproveoutcomes AT hallidayalison improvingqualityofcarotidinterventionsidentifyinghospitallevelstructuralfactorsthatcanimproveoutcomes AT bulbuliarichard improvingqualityofcarotidinterventionsidentifyinghospitallevelstructuralfactorsthatcanimproveoutcomes AT chanaprem improvingqualityofcarotidinterventionsidentifyinghospitallevelstructuralfactorsthatcanimproveoutcomes |