Cargando…

Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis

Digital image analysis (DIA) is impacted by the quality of tissue staining. This study examined the influence of preanalytical variables—staining protocol design, reagent quality, section attributes, and instrumentation—on the performance of automated DIA software. Our hypotheses were that (1) stain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chlipala, Elizabeth A., Butters, Mark, Brous, Miles, Fortin, Jessica S., Archuletta, Roni, Copeland, Karen, Bolon, Brad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192623320970534
_version_ 1783687482003423232
author Chlipala, Elizabeth A.
Butters, Mark
Brous, Miles
Fortin, Jessica S.
Archuletta, Roni
Copeland, Karen
Bolon, Brad
author_facet Chlipala, Elizabeth A.
Butters, Mark
Brous, Miles
Fortin, Jessica S.
Archuletta, Roni
Copeland, Karen
Bolon, Brad
author_sort Chlipala, Elizabeth A.
collection PubMed
description Digital image analysis (DIA) is impacted by the quality of tissue staining. This study examined the influence of preanalytical variables—staining protocol design, reagent quality, section attributes, and instrumentation—on the performance of automated DIA software. Our hypotheses were that (1) staining intensity is impacted by subtle differences in protocol design, reagent quality, and section composition and that (2) identically programmed and loaded stainers will produce equivalent immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. We tested these propositions by using 1 hematoxylin and eosin stainer to process 13 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) mouse tissues and by using 3 identically programmed and loaded immunostainers to process 5 FFPE mouse tissues for 4 cell biomarkers. Digital images of stained sections acquired with a commercial whole slide scanner were analyzed by customizable algorithms incorporated into commercially available DIA software. Staining intensity as viewed qualitatively by an observer and/or quantitatively by DIA was affected by staining conditions and tissue attributes. Intrarun and inter-run IHC staining intensities were equivalent for each tissue when processed on a given stainer but varied measurably across stainers. Our data indicate that staining quality must be monitored for each method and stainer to ensure that preanalytical factors do not impact digital pathology data quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8091422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80914222021-05-17 Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis Chlipala, Elizabeth A. Butters, Mark Brous, Miles Fortin, Jessica S. Archuletta, Roni Copeland, Karen Bolon, Brad Toxicol Pathol Original Articles Digital image analysis (DIA) is impacted by the quality of tissue staining. This study examined the influence of preanalytical variables—staining protocol design, reagent quality, section attributes, and instrumentation—on the performance of automated DIA software. Our hypotheses were that (1) staining intensity is impacted by subtle differences in protocol design, reagent quality, and section composition and that (2) identically programmed and loaded stainers will produce equivalent immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. We tested these propositions by using 1 hematoxylin and eosin stainer to process 13 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) mouse tissues and by using 3 identically programmed and loaded immunostainers to process 5 FFPE mouse tissues for 4 cell biomarkers. Digital images of stained sections acquired with a commercial whole slide scanner were analyzed by customizable algorithms incorporated into commercially available DIA software. Staining intensity as viewed qualitatively by an observer and/or quantitatively by DIA was affected by staining conditions and tissue attributes. Intrarun and inter-run IHC staining intensities were equivalent for each tissue when processed on a given stainer but varied measurably across stainers. Our data indicate that staining quality must be monitored for each method and stainer to ensure that preanalytical factors do not impact digital pathology data quality. SAGE Publications 2020-11-28 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8091422/ /pubmed/33251977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192623320970534 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chlipala, Elizabeth A.
Butters, Mark
Brous, Miles
Fortin, Jessica S.
Archuletta, Roni
Copeland, Karen
Bolon, Brad
Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis
title Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis
title_full Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis
title_fullStr Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis
title_short Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis
title_sort impact of preanalytical factors during histology processing on section suitability for digital image analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192623320970534
work_keys_str_mv AT chlipalaelizabetha impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis
AT buttersmark impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis
AT brousmiles impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis
AT fortinjessicas impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis
AT archulettaroni impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis
AT copelandkaren impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis
AT bolonbrad impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis