Cargando…
Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis
Digital image analysis (DIA) is impacted by the quality of tissue staining. This study examined the influence of preanalytical variables—staining protocol design, reagent quality, section attributes, and instrumentation—on the performance of automated DIA software. Our hypotheses were that (1) stain...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192623320970534 |
_version_ | 1783687482003423232 |
---|---|
author | Chlipala, Elizabeth A. Butters, Mark Brous, Miles Fortin, Jessica S. Archuletta, Roni Copeland, Karen Bolon, Brad |
author_facet | Chlipala, Elizabeth A. Butters, Mark Brous, Miles Fortin, Jessica S. Archuletta, Roni Copeland, Karen Bolon, Brad |
author_sort | Chlipala, Elizabeth A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Digital image analysis (DIA) is impacted by the quality of tissue staining. This study examined the influence of preanalytical variables—staining protocol design, reagent quality, section attributes, and instrumentation—on the performance of automated DIA software. Our hypotheses were that (1) staining intensity is impacted by subtle differences in protocol design, reagent quality, and section composition and that (2) identically programmed and loaded stainers will produce equivalent immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. We tested these propositions by using 1 hematoxylin and eosin stainer to process 13 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) mouse tissues and by using 3 identically programmed and loaded immunostainers to process 5 FFPE mouse tissues for 4 cell biomarkers. Digital images of stained sections acquired with a commercial whole slide scanner were analyzed by customizable algorithms incorporated into commercially available DIA software. Staining intensity as viewed qualitatively by an observer and/or quantitatively by DIA was affected by staining conditions and tissue attributes. Intrarun and inter-run IHC staining intensities were equivalent for each tissue when processed on a given stainer but varied measurably across stainers. Our data indicate that staining quality must be monitored for each method and stainer to ensure that preanalytical factors do not impact digital pathology data quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8091422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80914222021-05-17 Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis Chlipala, Elizabeth A. Butters, Mark Brous, Miles Fortin, Jessica S. Archuletta, Roni Copeland, Karen Bolon, Brad Toxicol Pathol Original Articles Digital image analysis (DIA) is impacted by the quality of tissue staining. This study examined the influence of preanalytical variables—staining protocol design, reagent quality, section attributes, and instrumentation—on the performance of automated DIA software. Our hypotheses were that (1) staining intensity is impacted by subtle differences in protocol design, reagent quality, and section composition and that (2) identically programmed and loaded stainers will produce equivalent immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. We tested these propositions by using 1 hematoxylin and eosin stainer to process 13 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) mouse tissues and by using 3 identically programmed and loaded immunostainers to process 5 FFPE mouse tissues for 4 cell biomarkers. Digital images of stained sections acquired with a commercial whole slide scanner were analyzed by customizable algorithms incorporated into commercially available DIA software. Staining intensity as viewed qualitatively by an observer and/or quantitatively by DIA was affected by staining conditions and tissue attributes. Intrarun and inter-run IHC staining intensities were equivalent for each tissue when processed on a given stainer but varied measurably across stainers. Our data indicate that staining quality must be monitored for each method and stainer to ensure that preanalytical factors do not impact digital pathology data quality. SAGE Publications 2020-11-28 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8091422/ /pubmed/33251977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192623320970534 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Chlipala, Elizabeth A. Butters, Mark Brous, Miles Fortin, Jessica S. Archuletta, Roni Copeland, Karen Bolon, Brad Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis |
title | Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis |
title_full | Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis |
title_fullStr | Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis |
title_short | Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis |
title_sort | impact of preanalytical factors during histology processing on section suitability for digital image analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192623320970534 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chlipalaelizabetha impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis AT buttersmark impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis AT brousmiles impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis AT fortinjessicas impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis AT archulettaroni impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis AT copelandkaren impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis AT bolonbrad impactofpreanalyticalfactorsduringhistologyprocessingonsectionsuitabilityfordigitalimageanalysis |