Cargando…

“Strengthening data quality and reporting from small-scale surveys in humanitarian settings: a case study from Yemen, 2011–2019”

BACKGROUND: Under-five death rate is one of the major indicators used in assessing the level of needs and severity of humanitarian crisis. Over the years, a number of small-scale surveys based on Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transitions methodology has been conducted in Yemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogbu, Thomas Jideofor, Guha-Sapir, Debarati
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33941227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00369-2
_version_ 1783687497040003072
author Ogbu, Thomas Jideofor
Guha-Sapir, Debarati
author_facet Ogbu, Thomas Jideofor
Guha-Sapir, Debarati
author_sort Ogbu, Thomas Jideofor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Under-five death rate is one of the major indicators used in assessing the level of needs and severity of humanitarian crisis. Over the years, a number of small-scale surveys based on Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transitions methodology has been conducted in Yemen, these serve as a guide for policy maker and the humanitarian community. The aim of this study is to identify critical methodological and reporting weaknesses that are easy to correct and would improve substantively the quality of the results. METHODS: We obtained seventy-seven surveys conducted across 22 governorates in Yemen between 2011 and 2019 and divided the analysis period into pre-crisis (2011–2014) and crisis period (2015–2019) for comparison. We analysed survey qualities such as sampling methodology, completeness of reporting of Under-five death rate and mortality sample size for children less than five (children < 5) years old. RESULTS: Seventy-seven (71.9%) out of 107 surveys met the eligibility criteria to be included in the study. The methodological quality and reporting are as varied as the surveys. 23.4% (n = 18) met the criteria for quality of sampling methodology, while 77.9%(n = 60) presented required information for the estimation of required mortality sample size and 40.3%(n = 31) met the quality check for reporting of Under-five death rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our assessment indicated that there is no strict adherence to the sampling methodology set out in Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transitions guidelines, and reporting of mortality and sample size data. Adherence to methodological guidelines and complete reporting of surveys in humanitarian settings will vastly improve both the quality and uptake of key data on health and nutrition of the affected population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13031-021-00369-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8091505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80915052021-05-04 “Strengthening data quality and reporting from small-scale surveys in humanitarian settings: a case study from Yemen, 2011–2019” Ogbu, Thomas Jideofor Guha-Sapir, Debarati Confl Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Under-five death rate is one of the major indicators used in assessing the level of needs and severity of humanitarian crisis. Over the years, a number of small-scale surveys based on Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transitions methodology has been conducted in Yemen, these serve as a guide for policy maker and the humanitarian community. The aim of this study is to identify critical methodological and reporting weaknesses that are easy to correct and would improve substantively the quality of the results. METHODS: We obtained seventy-seven surveys conducted across 22 governorates in Yemen between 2011 and 2019 and divided the analysis period into pre-crisis (2011–2014) and crisis period (2015–2019) for comparison. We analysed survey qualities such as sampling methodology, completeness of reporting of Under-five death rate and mortality sample size for children less than five (children < 5) years old. RESULTS: Seventy-seven (71.9%) out of 107 surveys met the eligibility criteria to be included in the study. The methodological quality and reporting are as varied as the surveys. 23.4% (n = 18) met the criteria for quality of sampling methodology, while 77.9%(n = 60) presented required information for the estimation of required mortality sample size and 40.3%(n = 31) met the quality check for reporting of Under-five death rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our assessment indicated that there is no strict adherence to the sampling methodology set out in Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transitions guidelines, and reporting of mortality and sample size data. Adherence to methodological guidelines and complete reporting of surveys in humanitarian settings will vastly improve both the quality and uptake of key data on health and nutrition of the affected population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13031-021-00369-2. BioMed Central 2021-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8091505/ /pubmed/33941227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00369-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ogbu, Thomas Jideofor
Guha-Sapir, Debarati
“Strengthening data quality and reporting from small-scale surveys in humanitarian settings: a case study from Yemen, 2011–2019”
title “Strengthening data quality and reporting from small-scale surveys in humanitarian settings: a case study from Yemen, 2011–2019”
title_full “Strengthening data quality and reporting from small-scale surveys in humanitarian settings: a case study from Yemen, 2011–2019”
title_fullStr “Strengthening data quality and reporting from small-scale surveys in humanitarian settings: a case study from Yemen, 2011–2019”
title_full_unstemmed “Strengthening data quality and reporting from small-scale surveys in humanitarian settings: a case study from Yemen, 2011–2019”
title_short “Strengthening data quality and reporting from small-scale surveys in humanitarian settings: a case study from Yemen, 2011–2019”
title_sort “strengthening data quality and reporting from small-scale surveys in humanitarian settings: a case study from yemen, 2011–2019”
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33941227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00369-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ogbuthomasjideofor strengtheningdataqualityandreportingfromsmallscalesurveysinhumanitariansettingsacasestudyfromyemen20112019
AT guhasapirdebarati strengtheningdataqualityandreportingfromsmallscalesurveysinhumanitariansettingsacasestudyfromyemen20112019