Cargando…
Subfascial‐located contraceptive devices requiring surgical removal
BACKGROUND: Subdermal etonogestrel implants are highly effective contraceptive methods. Despite standardization of insertion technique by the manufacturer, some implants are inadvertently placed too deeply within or below the plane of the biceps brachii fascia. Placement of these implants in a deep...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33934717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-021-00158-5 |
_version_ | 1783687503096578048 |
---|---|
author | Hellwinkel, Justin E. Konigsberg, Matthew W. Oviedo, Johana Castaño, Paula M. Kadiyala, R. Kumar |
author_facet | Hellwinkel, Justin E. Konigsberg, Matthew W. Oviedo, Johana Castaño, Paula M. Kadiyala, R. Kumar |
author_sort | Hellwinkel, Justin E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Subdermal etonogestrel implants are highly effective contraceptive methods. Despite standardization of insertion technique by the manufacturer, some implants are inadvertently placed too deeply within or below the plane of the biceps brachii fascia. Placement of these implants in a deep tissue plane results in more difficult removal, which is not always possible in the office setting. In rare cases, surgical removal by an upper extremity surgeon is warranted. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we present 6 cases of etonogestrel implants located in a subfascial plane requiring removal by an upper extremity surgeon. Implants were all localized with plain radiography and ultrasound prior to surgical removal. All cases had implants located in the subfascial plane and one was identified intramuscularly. The average age was 28 years (19–33) and BMI was 24.0 kg/m^2 (19.1–36.5), with the most common reason for removal being irregular bleeding. The majority of cases (5/6) were performed under monitored anesthesia care with local anesthetic and one case utilized regional anesthesia. All implants were surgically removed without complication. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion of etonogestrel contraceptive implants deep to the biceps brachii fascia is a rare, but dangerous complication. Removal of these implants is not always successful in the office setting and referral to an upper extremity surgeon is necessary to avoid damage to delicate neurovascular structures for safe removal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8091535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80915352021-05-04 Subfascial‐located contraceptive devices requiring surgical removal Hellwinkel, Justin E. Konigsberg, Matthew W. Oviedo, Johana Castaño, Paula M. Kadiyala, R. Kumar Contracept Reprod Med Case Report BACKGROUND: Subdermal etonogestrel implants are highly effective contraceptive methods. Despite standardization of insertion technique by the manufacturer, some implants are inadvertently placed too deeply within or below the plane of the biceps brachii fascia. Placement of these implants in a deep tissue plane results in more difficult removal, which is not always possible in the office setting. In rare cases, surgical removal by an upper extremity surgeon is warranted. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we present 6 cases of etonogestrel implants located in a subfascial plane requiring removal by an upper extremity surgeon. Implants were all localized with plain radiography and ultrasound prior to surgical removal. All cases had implants located in the subfascial plane and one was identified intramuscularly. The average age was 28 years (19–33) and BMI was 24.0 kg/m^2 (19.1–36.5), with the most common reason for removal being irregular bleeding. The majority of cases (5/6) were performed under monitored anesthesia care with local anesthetic and one case utilized regional anesthesia. All implants were surgically removed without complication. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion of etonogestrel contraceptive implants deep to the biceps brachii fascia is a rare, but dangerous complication. Removal of these implants is not always successful in the office setting and referral to an upper extremity surgeon is necessary to avoid damage to delicate neurovascular structures for safe removal. BioMed Central 2021-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8091535/ /pubmed/33934717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-021-00158-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Hellwinkel, Justin E. Konigsberg, Matthew W. Oviedo, Johana Castaño, Paula M. Kadiyala, R. Kumar Subfascial‐located contraceptive devices requiring surgical removal |
title | Subfascial‐located contraceptive devices requiring surgical removal |
title_full | Subfascial‐located contraceptive devices requiring surgical removal |
title_fullStr | Subfascial‐located contraceptive devices requiring surgical removal |
title_full_unstemmed | Subfascial‐located contraceptive devices requiring surgical removal |
title_short | Subfascial‐located contraceptive devices requiring surgical removal |
title_sort | subfascial‐located contraceptive devices requiring surgical removal |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33934717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-021-00158-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hellwinkeljustine subfasciallocatedcontraceptivedevicesrequiringsurgicalremoval AT konigsbergmattheww subfasciallocatedcontraceptivedevicesrequiringsurgicalremoval AT oviedojohana subfasciallocatedcontraceptivedevicesrequiringsurgicalremoval AT castanopaulam subfasciallocatedcontraceptivedevicesrequiringsurgicalremoval AT kadiyalarkumar subfasciallocatedcontraceptivedevicesrequiringsurgicalremoval |