Cargando…
iRFP (near-infrared fluorescent protein) imaging of subcutaneous and deep tissue tumours in mice highlights differences between imaging platforms
BACKGROUND: In vivo imaging using fluorescence is used in cancer biology for the detection, measurement and monitoring of tumours. This can be achieved with the expression of fluorescent proteins such as iRFP, which emits light at a wavelength less attenuated in biological tissues compared to light...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33941186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01918-8 |
_version_ | 1783687536198025216 |
---|---|
author | Hall, C. von Grabowiecki, Y. Pearce, S. P. Dive, C. Bagley, S. Muller, P. A. J. |
author_facet | Hall, C. von Grabowiecki, Y. Pearce, S. P. Dive, C. Bagley, S. Muller, P. A. J. |
author_sort | Hall, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In vivo imaging using fluorescence is used in cancer biology for the detection, measurement and monitoring of tumours. This can be achieved with the expression of fluorescent proteins such as iRFP, which emits light at a wavelength less attenuated in biological tissues compared to light emitted by other fluorescent proteins such as GFP or RFP. Imaging platforms capable of detecting fluorescent tumours in small animals have been developed but studies comparing the performance of these platforms are scarce. RESULTS: Through access to three platforms from Xenogen, Bruker and Li-Cor, we compared their ability to detect iRFP-expressing subcutaneous tumours as well as tumours localised deeper within the body of female NSG mice. Each platform was paired with proprietary software for image analyse, but the output depends on subjective decisions from the user. To more objectively compare platforms, we developed an ‘in house’ software-based approach which results in lower measured variability between mice. CONCLUSIONS: Our comparisons showed that all three platforms allowed for reliable detection and monitoring of subcutaneous iRFP tumour growth. The biggest differences between platforms became apparent when imaging deeper tumours with the Li-Cor platform detecting most tumours and showing the highest dynamic range. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-021-01918-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8091726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80917262021-05-04 iRFP (near-infrared fluorescent protein) imaging of subcutaneous and deep tissue tumours in mice highlights differences between imaging platforms Hall, C. von Grabowiecki, Y. Pearce, S. P. Dive, C. Bagley, S. Muller, P. A. J. Cancer Cell Int Primary Research BACKGROUND: In vivo imaging using fluorescence is used in cancer biology for the detection, measurement and monitoring of tumours. This can be achieved with the expression of fluorescent proteins such as iRFP, which emits light at a wavelength less attenuated in biological tissues compared to light emitted by other fluorescent proteins such as GFP or RFP. Imaging platforms capable of detecting fluorescent tumours in small animals have been developed but studies comparing the performance of these platforms are scarce. RESULTS: Through access to three platforms from Xenogen, Bruker and Li-Cor, we compared their ability to detect iRFP-expressing subcutaneous tumours as well as tumours localised deeper within the body of female NSG mice. Each platform was paired with proprietary software for image analyse, but the output depends on subjective decisions from the user. To more objectively compare platforms, we developed an ‘in house’ software-based approach which results in lower measured variability between mice. CONCLUSIONS: Our comparisons showed that all three platforms allowed for reliable detection and monitoring of subcutaneous iRFP tumour growth. The biggest differences between platforms became apparent when imaging deeper tumours with the Li-Cor platform detecting most tumours and showing the highest dynamic range. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-021-01918-8. BioMed Central 2021-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8091726/ /pubmed/33941186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01918-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Primary Research Hall, C. von Grabowiecki, Y. Pearce, S. P. Dive, C. Bagley, S. Muller, P. A. J. iRFP (near-infrared fluorescent protein) imaging of subcutaneous and deep tissue tumours in mice highlights differences between imaging platforms |
title | iRFP (near-infrared fluorescent protein) imaging of subcutaneous and deep tissue tumours in mice highlights differences between imaging platforms |
title_full | iRFP (near-infrared fluorescent protein) imaging of subcutaneous and deep tissue tumours in mice highlights differences between imaging platforms |
title_fullStr | iRFP (near-infrared fluorescent protein) imaging of subcutaneous and deep tissue tumours in mice highlights differences between imaging platforms |
title_full_unstemmed | iRFP (near-infrared fluorescent protein) imaging of subcutaneous and deep tissue tumours in mice highlights differences between imaging platforms |
title_short | iRFP (near-infrared fluorescent protein) imaging of subcutaneous and deep tissue tumours in mice highlights differences between imaging platforms |
title_sort | irfp (near-infrared fluorescent protein) imaging of subcutaneous and deep tissue tumours in mice highlights differences between imaging platforms |
topic | Primary Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33941186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01918-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hallc irfpnearinfraredfluorescentproteinimagingofsubcutaneousanddeeptissuetumoursinmicehighlightsdifferencesbetweenimagingplatforms AT vongrabowieckiy irfpnearinfraredfluorescentproteinimagingofsubcutaneousanddeeptissuetumoursinmicehighlightsdifferencesbetweenimagingplatforms AT pearcesp irfpnearinfraredfluorescentproteinimagingofsubcutaneousanddeeptissuetumoursinmicehighlightsdifferencesbetweenimagingplatforms AT divec irfpnearinfraredfluorescentproteinimagingofsubcutaneousanddeeptissuetumoursinmicehighlightsdifferencesbetweenimagingplatforms AT bagleys irfpnearinfraredfluorescentproteinimagingofsubcutaneousanddeeptissuetumoursinmicehighlightsdifferencesbetweenimagingplatforms AT mullerpaj irfpnearinfraredfluorescentproteinimagingofsubcutaneousanddeeptissuetumoursinmicehighlightsdifferencesbetweenimagingplatforms |