Cargando…

Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs

Antemortem detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in swine production systems has relied on antibody testing, but the availability of tests based on DNA detection and novel diagnostic specimens, e.g., tracheal swabs and oral fluids, has the potential to improve M. hyopneumoniae surveillance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clavijo, Maria Jose, Hu, Dapeng, Krantz, Seth, Cano, Jean Paul, Pereira Maróstica, Thairê, Henao-Diaz, Alexandra, Poeta Silva, Ana Paula S., Hemker, Deanne, Tapia, Edgar, Zimmerman, Silvia, Fano, Eduardo, Polson, Dale, Fitzgerald, Robert, Tucker, Alexander, Main, Rodger, Wang, Chong, Zimmerman, Jeffrey J., Rotolo, Marisa L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03051-20
_version_ 1783687556507893760
author Clavijo, Maria Jose
Hu, Dapeng
Krantz, Seth
Cano, Jean Paul
Pereira Maróstica, Thairê
Henao-Diaz, Alexandra
Poeta Silva, Ana Paula S.
Hemker, Deanne
Tapia, Edgar
Zimmerman, Silvia
Fano, Eduardo
Polson, Dale
Fitzgerald, Robert
Tucker, Alexander
Main, Rodger
Wang, Chong
Zimmerman, Jeffrey J.
Rotolo, Marisa L.
author_facet Clavijo, Maria Jose
Hu, Dapeng
Krantz, Seth
Cano, Jean Paul
Pereira Maróstica, Thairê
Henao-Diaz, Alexandra
Poeta Silva, Ana Paula S.
Hemker, Deanne
Tapia, Edgar
Zimmerman, Silvia
Fano, Eduardo
Polson, Dale
Fitzgerald, Robert
Tucker, Alexander
Main, Rodger
Wang, Chong
Zimmerman, Jeffrey J.
Rotolo, Marisa L.
author_sort Clavijo, Maria Jose
collection PubMed
description Antemortem detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in swine production systems has relied on antibody testing, but the availability of tests based on DNA detection and novel diagnostic specimens, e.g., tracheal swabs and oral fluids, has the potential to improve M. hyopneumoniae surveillance. A field study was performed over a 14-week period during which 10 pigs in one pen at the center of a room with 1,250 6-week-old pigs housed in 46 pens were intratracheally inoculated with M. hyopneumoniae. Thereafter, one tracheal sample, four serum samples, and one oral fluid sample were collected from every pen at 2-week intervals. Tracheal and oral fluid samples were tested for M. hyopneumoniae DNA and serum samples for M. hyopneumoniae antibody. Test results were modeled using a hierarchical Bayesian model, based on a latent spatial piecewise exponential survival model, to estimate the probability of detection by within-pen prevalence, number of positive pens in the barn, sample allocation, sample size, and sample type over time. Analysis showed that tracheal samples provided the earliest detection, especially at large sample sizes. While serum samples are more commonly collected and are less expensive to test, high probability of detection estimates were only obtained 30 days postexposure at large sample sizes. In all scenarios, probability of detection estimates for oral fluids within 30 days were significantly lower than those for tracheal and serum samples. Ultimately, the choice of specimen type, sample number, and assay will depend on testing objectives and economics, but the estimates provided here will assist in the design of M. hyopneumoniae surveillance and monitoring programs for different situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8091834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80918342021-10-20 Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs Clavijo, Maria Jose Hu, Dapeng Krantz, Seth Cano, Jean Paul Pereira Maróstica, Thairê Henao-Diaz, Alexandra Poeta Silva, Ana Paula S. Hemker, Deanne Tapia, Edgar Zimmerman, Silvia Fano, Eduardo Polson, Dale Fitzgerald, Robert Tucker, Alexander Main, Rodger Wang, Chong Zimmerman, Jeffrey J. Rotolo, Marisa L. J Clin Microbiol Epidemiology Antemortem detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in swine production systems has relied on antibody testing, but the availability of tests based on DNA detection and novel diagnostic specimens, e.g., tracheal swabs and oral fluids, has the potential to improve M. hyopneumoniae surveillance. A field study was performed over a 14-week period during which 10 pigs in one pen at the center of a room with 1,250 6-week-old pigs housed in 46 pens were intratracheally inoculated with M. hyopneumoniae. Thereafter, one tracheal sample, four serum samples, and one oral fluid sample were collected from every pen at 2-week intervals. Tracheal and oral fluid samples were tested for M. hyopneumoniae DNA and serum samples for M. hyopneumoniae antibody. Test results were modeled using a hierarchical Bayesian model, based on a latent spatial piecewise exponential survival model, to estimate the probability of detection by within-pen prevalence, number of positive pens in the barn, sample allocation, sample size, and sample type over time. Analysis showed that tracheal samples provided the earliest detection, especially at large sample sizes. While serum samples are more commonly collected and are less expensive to test, high probability of detection estimates were only obtained 30 days postexposure at large sample sizes. In all scenarios, probability of detection estimates for oral fluids within 30 days were significantly lower than those for tracheal and serum samples. Ultimately, the choice of specimen type, sample number, and assay will depend on testing objectives and economics, but the estimates provided here will assist in the design of M. hyopneumoniae surveillance and monitoring programs for different situations. American Society for Microbiology 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8091834/ /pubmed/33597256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03051-20 Text en Copyright © 2021 Clavijo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Clavijo, Maria Jose
Hu, Dapeng
Krantz, Seth
Cano, Jean Paul
Pereira Maróstica, Thairê
Henao-Diaz, Alexandra
Poeta Silva, Ana Paula S.
Hemker, Deanne
Tapia, Edgar
Zimmerman, Silvia
Fano, Eduardo
Polson, Dale
Fitzgerald, Robert
Tucker, Alexander
Main, Rodger
Wang, Chong
Zimmerman, Jeffrey J.
Rotolo, Marisa L.
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs
title Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs
title_full Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs
title_fullStr Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs
title_full_unstemmed Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs
title_short Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs
title_sort mycoplasma hyopneumoniae surveillance in pig populations: establishing sampling guidelines for detection in growing pigs
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03051-20
work_keys_str_mv AT clavijomariajose mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT hudapeng mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT krantzseth mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT canojeanpaul mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT pereiramarosticathaire mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT henaodiazalexandra mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT poetasilvaanapaulas mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT hemkerdeanne mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT tapiaedgar mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT zimmermansilvia mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT fanoeduardo mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT polsondale mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT fitzgeraldrobert mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT tuckeralexander mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT mainrodger mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT wangchong mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT zimmermanjeffreyj mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs
AT rotolomarisal mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs