Cargando…
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs
Antemortem detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in swine production systems has relied on antibody testing, but the availability of tests based on DNA detection and novel diagnostic specimens, e.g., tracheal swabs and oral fluids, has the potential to improve M. hyopneumoniae surveillance...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03051-20 |
_version_ | 1783687556507893760 |
---|---|
author | Clavijo, Maria Jose Hu, Dapeng Krantz, Seth Cano, Jean Paul Pereira Maróstica, Thairê Henao-Diaz, Alexandra Poeta Silva, Ana Paula S. Hemker, Deanne Tapia, Edgar Zimmerman, Silvia Fano, Eduardo Polson, Dale Fitzgerald, Robert Tucker, Alexander Main, Rodger Wang, Chong Zimmerman, Jeffrey J. Rotolo, Marisa L. |
author_facet | Clavijo, Maria Jose Hu, Dapeng Krantz, Seth Cano, Jean Paul Pereira Maróstica, Thairê Henao-Diaz, Alexandra Poeta Silva, Ana Paula S. Hemker, Deanne Tapia, Edgar Zimmerman, Silvia Fano, Eduardo Polson, Dale Fitzgerald, Robert Tucker, Alexander Main, Rodger Wang, Chong Zimmerman, Jeffrey J. Rotolo, Marisa L. |
author_sort | Clavijo, Maria Jose |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antemortem detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in swine production systems has relied on antibody testing, but the availability of tests based on DNA detection and novel diagnostic specimens, e.g., tracheal swabs and oral fluids, has the potential to improve M. hyopneumoniae surveillance. A field study was performed over a 14-week period during which 10 pigs in one pen at the center of a room with 1,250 6-week-old pigs housed in 46 pens were intratracheally inoculated with M. hyopneumoniae. Thereafter, one tracheal sample, four serum samples, and one oral fluid sample were collected from every pen at 2-week intervals. Tracheal and oral fluid samples were tested for M. hyopneumoniae DNA and serum samples for M. hyopneumoniae antibody. Test results were modeled using a hierarchical Bayesian model, based on a latent spatial piecewise exponential survival model, to estimate the probability of detection by within-pen prevalence, number of positive pens in the barn, sample allocation, sample size, and sample type over time. Analysis showed that tracheal samples provided the earliest detection, especially at large sample sizes. While serum samples are more commonly collected and are less expensive to test, high probability of detection estimates were only obtained 30 days postexposure at large sample sizes. In all scenarios, probability of detection estimates for oral fluids within 30 days were significantly lower than those for tracheal and serum samples. Ultimately, the choice of specimen type, sample number, and assay will depend on testing objectives and economics, but the estimates provided here will assist in the design of M. hyopneumoniae surveillance and monitoring programs for different situations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8091834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80918342021-10-20 Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs Clavijo, Maria Jose Hu, Dapeng Krantz, Seth Cano, Jean Paul Pereira Maróstica, Thairê Henao-Diaz, Alexandra Poeta Silva, Ana Paula S. Hemker, Deanne Tapia, Edgar Zimmerman, Silvia Fano, Eduardo Polson, Dale Fitzgerald, Robert Tucker, Alexander Main, Rodger Wang, Chong Zimmerman, Jeffrey J. Rotolo, Marisa L. J Clin Microbiol Epidemiology Antemortem detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in swine production systems has relied on antibody testing, but the availability of tests based on DNA detection and novel diagnostic specimens, e.g., tracheal swabs and oral fluids, has the potential to improve M. hyopneumoniae surveillance. A field study was performed over a 14-week period during which 10 pigs in one pen at the center of a room with 1,250 6-week-old pigs housed in 46 pens were intratracheally inoculated with M. hyopneumoniae. Thereafter, one tracheal sample, four serum samples, and one oral fluid sample were collected from every pen at 2-week intervals. Tracheal and oral fluid samples were tested for M. hyopneumoniae DNA and serum samples for M. hyopneumoniae antibody. Test results were modeled using a hierarchical Bayesian model, based on a latent spatial piecewise exponential survival model, to estimate the probability of detection by within-pen prevalence, number of positive pens in the barn, sample allocation, sample size, and sample type over time. Analysis showed that tracheal samples provided the earliest detection, especially at large sample sizes. While serum samples are more commonly collected and are less expensive to test, high probability of detection estimates were only obtained 30 days postexposure at large sample sizes. In all scenarios, probability of detection estimates for oral fluids within 30 days were significantly lower than those for tracheal and serum samples. Ultimately, the choice of specimen type, sample number, and assay will depend on testing objectives and economics, but the estimates provided here will assist in the design of M. hyopneumoniae surveillance and monitoring programs for different situations. American Society for Microbiology 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8091834/ /pubmed/33597256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03051-20 Text en Copyright © 2021 Clavijo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Clavijo, Maria Jose Hu, Dapeng Krantz, Seth Cano, Jean Paul Pereira Maróstica, Thairê Henao-Diaz, Alexandra Poeta Silva, Ana Paula S. Hemker, Deanne Tapia, Edgar Zimmerman, Silvia Fano, Eduardo Polson, Dale Fitzgerald, Robert Tucker, Alexander Main, Rodger Wang, Chong Zimmerman, Jeffrey J. Rotolo, Marisa L. Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs |
title | Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs |
title_full | Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs |
title_fullStr | Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs |
title_full_unstemmed | Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs |
title_short | Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs |
title_sort | mycoplasma hyopneumoniae surveillance in pig populations: establishing sampling guidelines for detection in growing pigs |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03051-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clavijomariajose mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT hudapeng mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT krantzseth mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT canojeanpaul mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT pereiramarosticathaire mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT henaodiazalexandra mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT poetasilvaanapaulas mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT hemkerdeanne mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT tapiaedgar mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT zimmermansilvia mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT fanoeduardo mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT polsondale mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT fitzgeraldrobert mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT tuckeralexander mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT mainrodger mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT wangchong mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT zimmermanjeffreyj mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs AT rotolomarisal mycoplasmahyopneumoniaesurveillanceinpigpopulationsestablishingsamplingguidelinesfordetectioningrowingpigs |