Cargando…

Comparative Assessment of Canal Transportation, Dentin Loss, and Remaining Root Filling Material by Different Retreatment Files An In vitro Cross-Sectional Study

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the centering ability, canal transportation and efficacy of re-treatment rotary and hand files in removing Gutta Percha from root canals using Cone Beam Computed Tomography(CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted human maxillary anteriors were obt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, Afzal, Saraf, Prahlad, Kamatagi, Laxmikant, Khasnis, Sandhya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33967532
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_31_20
_version_ 1783687587624386560
author Ali, Afzal
Saraf, Prahlad
Kamatagi, Laxmikant
Khasnis, Sandhya
author_facet Ali, Afzal
Saraf, Prahlad
Kamatagi, Laxmikant
Khasnis, Sandhya
author_sort Ali, Afzal
collection PubMed
description AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the centering ability, canal transportation and efficacy of re-treatment rotary and hand files in removing Gutta Percha from root canals using Cone Beam Computed Tomography(CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted human maxillary anteriors were obturated and randomly divided into three groups. Root fillings were removed with ProTaper Universal retreatment system, R-Endo system, and Hedstrom files. CBCT scans were taken. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULTS: The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 15.0, IBM). The mean and standard deviation among the groups was calculated by one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal–Wallis, and Mann– Whitney U-tests, and the comparison among the various groups was done by post hoc Tukey's test. A statistically significant amount of remaining root canal filling material and canal transportation was noted (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: No system completely removed the root filling material from root canals. Manual instrumentation resulted in more dentin loss and canal transportation than rotary file system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8092085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80920852021-05-06 Comparative Assessment of Canal Transportation, Dentin Loss, and Remaining Root Filling Material by Different Retreatment Files An In vitro Cross-Sectional Study Ali, Afzal Saraf, Prahlad Kamatagi, Laxmikant Khasnis, Sandhya Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the centering ability, canal transportation and efficacy of re-treatment rotary and hand files in removing Gutta Percha from root canals using Cone Beam Computed Tomography(CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted human maxillary anteriors were obturated and randomly divided into three groups. Root fillings were removed with ProTaper Universal retreatment system, R-Endo system, and Hedstrom files. CBCT scans were taken. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULTS: The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 15.0, IBM). The mean and standard deviation among the groups was calculated by one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal–Wallis, and Mann– Whitney U-tests, and the comparison among the various groups was done by post hoc Tukey's test. A statistically significant amount of remaining root canal filling material and canal transportation was noted (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: No system completely removed the root filling material from root canals. Manual instrumentation resulted in more dentin loss and canal transportation than rotary file system. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8092085/ /pubmed/33967532 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_31_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ali, Afzal
Saraf, Prahlad
Kamatagi, Laxmikant
Khasnis, Sandhya
Comparative Assessment of Canal Transportation, Dentin Loss, and Remaining Root Filling Material by Different Retreatment Files An In vitro Cross-Sectional Study
title Comparative Assessment of Canal Transportation, Dentin Loss, and Remaining Root Filling Material by Different Retreatment Files An In vitro Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Comparative Assessment of Canal Transportation, Dentin Loss, and Remaining Root Filling Material by Different Retreatment Files An In vitro Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Comparative Assessment of Canal Transportation, Dentin Loss, and Remaining Root Filling Material by Different Retreatment Files An In vitro Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Assessment of Canal Transportation, Dentin Loss, and Remaining Root Filling Material by Different Retreatment Files An In vitro Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Comparative Assessment of Canal Transportation, Dentin Loss, and Remaining Root Filling Material by Different Retreatment Files An In vitro Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort comparative assessment of canal transportation, dentin loss, and remaining root filling material by different retreatment files an in vitro cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33967532
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_31_20
work_keys_str_mv AT aliafzal comparativeassessmentofcanaltransportationdentinlossandremainingrootfillingmaterialbydifferentretreatmentfilesaninvitrocrosssectionalstudy
AT sarafprahlad comparativeassessmentofcanaltransportationdentinlossandremainingrootfillingmaterialbydifferentretreatmentfilesaninvitrocrosssectionalstudy
AT kamatagilaxmikant comparativeassessmentofcanaltransportationdentinlossandremainingrootfillingmaterialbydifferentretreatmentfilesaninvitrocrosssectionalstudy
AT khasnissandhya comparativeassessmentofcanaltransportationdentinlossandremainingrootfillingmaterialbydifferentretreatmentfilesaninvitrocrosssectionalstudy